User talk:Atcher3

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Atcher3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 00:20, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Proposed deletion of One-Shot Entanglement-Enhanced Classical Communication


The article One-Shot Entanglement-Enhanced Classical Communication has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no content, no references (WP:NOTABILITY/WP:VERIFIABILITY) and page name too specific?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. User:ConconJondor talk contribs 19:28, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to One-Shot Entanglement-Enhanced Classical Communication. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. User:ConconJondor talk contribs 20:15, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * It seems like I'm launching a "hate campaign" or similar against you. I'm not, I'm trying to help you become a better Wikipedian and these templates, although they seem clinical, are the easiest, quickest and most efficient way for me to do it. User:ConconJondor talk contribs 20:16, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of One-Shot Entanglement-Enhanced Classical Communication for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article One-Shot Entanglement-Enhanced Classical Communication is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/One-Shot Entanglement-Enhanced Classical Communication until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. &mdash; RHaworth 20:36, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of One-Shot Entanglement-Enhanced Classical Communication for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article One-Shot Entanglement-Enhanced Classical Communication is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/One-Shot Entanglement-Enhanced Classical Communication (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Despayre  tête-à-tête 14:48, 19 June 2012 (UTC)