User talk:Athar sid

Deleting new editor's articles for self improving should also judged by higher authorities,i think user's like him/her should be banned from writing. I am requesting to please re-check my stub article i created for Athar Siddiqui which is intentionally deleted by this user in the name of notibility and this is stopping and creating hurdles for the new authors and editor's who wants to show-case there talents.

Athar Siddiqui moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Athar Siddiqui, independent sources. (?) In addition, there appears to be a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself.  Onel 5969  TT me 19:56, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Athar Siddiqui
 The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Athar_sid help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! 115.96.77.66 (talk) 21:33, 8 February 2022 (UTC) Approves and notable

Article returned to draft
The article does not meet the standard od f wikipedia as found in WP:GNG, WP:BLP, and WP:NACTOR. If you are determined to move it to main space, be advised that it will be nominated for deletion. Also addressing the Conflict of Interest concern mentioned above is not optional.Slywriter (talk) 22:21, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Now here comes the friend's of the culprit who are equally faulted and always supports the wrong so that they can get the same help in return..please keep a judge on his/her account too..they are not just helping wikipedia ,they are selling pages by first deleting the article and then approaching the person to get it published by them for good amount of money on upwork type websites. They are ruining our chances yo make wikipedia a genuine writing platform for new authors and editor's... I was just moving this article again to publishing section because i have edited it very short and made it a stub which is clearly notable but these paid writer's are like leach for wikipedia ..please its my humble request from all indians to reconsider my article for Athar siddiqui and also unblock me from writing..🙏🤞🏿

Your submission at Articles for creation: Athar Siddiqui (February 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Slywriter were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Athar Siddiqui and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Athar Siddiqui, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Athar_Siddiqui Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Slywriter&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Athar_Siddiqui reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 22:25, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

.

For more reference and notibility please refer these links -

https://g.co/kgs/TB9xJ2

https://www.cinestaan.com/people/athar-siddiqui-158935/filmography https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/hindi/athar-siddiqui-all-set-to-play-a-double-role-in-mauka-e-vardaat/articleshow/86812128.cms

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/tv/news/hindi/athar-siddiqui-undergoes-hard-training-for-mann-ki-awaaz-pratigya-2/articleshow/81363347.cms

https://m.bombaytimes.com/searchresult.cms?query=%22athar%20siddiqui%22

https://zeenews.india.com/television/athar-siddiqui-set-to-play-antagonist-on-tv-2229230.html

There are 100 more notable news articles, press video's and interviews on google, which clearly shows that 'Athar siddiqui's article which i made should be there on atleast wikipedia stub category.. I am again requesting to please reconsider this article and just have a look once on the user who has deleted and banned me from writing.. This is so stressful how can one person spoil other's career for his profit...shame on the user.
 * Even if the subject is likely notable per WP:GNG standard, your repeated moving of drafts to the Article namespace after the previous article was deleted via a deletion discussion, especially when the drafts are, quite frankly, written rather poorly, is highly disruptive and stressful to other editors. -- Kinu t/c 19:47, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Fair enough kinu you have finally accepted that my article for Athar Siddiqui is notable so why did you moved it to the drafts giving a reason of "not notable" ..you should have clearly mentioned it bad writing like you just said now... Giving a wrong reason and removing my article again and again made me try again and again to prove that my article for a actor Athar Siddiqui is notable then why deleting or moving repeatedly... Fine i accept my bad writing or you can say i am not expert but i am trying to learn and showcase my skills ... You could have marked it vocabulary mistakes,non professional writing rather then moving it or deleting my notable article also banning me to write again for Wikipedia... Will definately work on professional skills next time but for that i need a chance ...please sign it to unblock me.. I just want to help wikipedia in loading correct info of unmentioned people...

Speedy deletion nomination of Athar Siddiqui


A tag has been placed on Athar Siddiqui requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles_for_deletion/Athar_Siddiqui. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Slywriter (talk) 23:40, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Kinu t/c 23:46, 8 February 2022 (UTC)