User talk:Atharvm234

Welcome!
Hi Atharvm234! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! -- Toddy1 (talk) 08:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello, I'm ArcAngel. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Culture of India have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.  ArcAngel    (talk) 03:57, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Charminar. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 05:02, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Hyderabad‎ did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! -- Toddy1 (talk) 08:17, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

The bold, revert, discuss cycle is a useful method of seeking consensus. Someone makes an edit; if another editor reverts it, then the first editor should use the article talk page to explain why he/she thinks the edit was a good idea. It also helps if both editors leave edit summaries that explain what they are doing and why they are doing it. -- Toddy1 (talk) 08:17, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Lingayatism, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 10:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Biryani‎. - Arjayay (talk) 20:12, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Religion in Asia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 20:15, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
— DaxServer (t · m · c) 20:16, 5 May 2023 (UTC)