User talk:Atifzain

Please do not add nonsence to Wiki as you did on Atif it is considered valndalism and really isnt terribly helpful.GazMan7 09:47, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Adding yourself to a page is considered vandalism. Only notable people should be added.--GazMan7 11:01, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Daraz.pk concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Daraz.pk, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:04, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Daraz.pk


Hello Atifzain. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Daraz.pk".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:00, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

May 2019
Hello, I'm Yamla. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Careem, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 10:56, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Ball tampering. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 10:58, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Shell Pakistan article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement: "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike".

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the Help Desk. You can also leave a message on my talk page. --Yamla (talk) 10:59, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Blocked
Ugggh, every single edit in May from this account was abusive. Rampant copyright violations, clear violations of WP:BLP including deliberate introduction of content refuted by the very citations you were adding, and edits that clearly harmed the page. As such, I have blocked this account indefinitely. I'm sorry to say, you've been placing Wikipedia at risk and actively harming the content. --Yamla (talk) 11:03, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Yamla Yamla, Thanks for guiding the world & me in the right way. My intentions were never wrong. However, I might do some violations without knowing. All I want to add info, except the last edit and very first about me (when I and wiki both were so young). I tried to put info with references (except the last one). I am here to say SORRY if I really ruined things for others. But my intentions were never wrong. Thanks for guiding me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atifzain (talk • contribs)
 * This was particularly blatant. You noted that a bowler was recorded tampering with the ball, but the citation you used explained very, very clearly that he did not tamper with the ball. I simply don't see how you'll be able to reconcile this contradiction, and it's a particularly severe one given our policy, WP:BLP. This wasn't a mistake, you went out of your way to claim tampering had occurred when you knew perfectly well it hadn't. If you wish to be unblocked, you'll have to explain why you did this. You'll also need to answer the following questions on copyright, given your blatant violations. The questions come from User:Yunshui/decline copyvio. Explain in your own words (not by copying-and-pasting):
 * What is copyright?
 * How is Wikipedia licenced?
 * Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
 * Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
 * How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?
 * Thanks. --Yamla (talk) 11:42, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

For tampering thing, the following is what I wrote. I added info whats in news. if its just a false allegation then I said it is. If you mean we need to write only thing which is endorsed by ICC then that's another case else news and source were mentioned. "Pakistan vs England One Day Series 2019 At 2nd One Day International between Pakistan & England in 2019 series, England fast bowler Liam Plunkettin was recorded on screen doing tampering with ball. In recorded footage, he seemed to scratching the ball with his nails. On release of this footage on social media People criticize the fast bowler, ECB and ICC & asked to go for an inquiry. Later ICC took action but set Plunkettin clear on this issue. [47] "

Regarding, unbanned my account, if you guys think I harmed your content with bad intentions then I don't wanna do it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atifzain (talk • contribs)
 * Let me be clear. You stated "Liam Plunkettin was recorded on screen doing tampering with ball". That was wrong of you. Your citation proves he did not tamper with the ball, but you claimed he did. By doing so, you harmed Wikipedia and violated WP:BLP, one of our most important policies. You need to explain your bad behaviour there. You also need to answer the questions above, about copyright which you have also been violating. --Yamla (talk) 12:20, 23 May 2019 (UTC)