User talk:Atikono1

March 2018
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to 2018 Monte-Carlo Rolex Masters, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk 08:20, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

2018 ATP World Tour Masters 1000 moved to Draft:2018 ATP World Tour Masters 1000
Hi, Greetings. Pls note that your creation of 2018 ATP World Tour Masters 1000 has been moved to Draft:2018 ATP World Tour Masters 1000. Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs "inline citation" from independent (third party / secondary / tertiary) reliable source (in any language) for verification to gauge the nobility criteria is met. The articles's inline citation is the WP:BURDEN which it is on the person adding the information. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such as facebook, twitter, instagram, imbd and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald, CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press). Pls see


 * 1) reliable source - see WP:RS
 * 2) primary vs secondary vs tiartiary source - see WP:WPNOTRS
 * 3) verification - see WP:V
 * 4) notability - see WP:N
 * 5) webcite - see  WP:CITEWEB and its template -see Template: cite web

Once you have provided inline citations, kindly ping me at my talk page or at your talk page by typing (pls do not include nowiki text)for me to review the page. For more editing help, you could send your question to the friendly and helpful volunteers at the Teahouse. Lastly, I strongly encourage you to visit WP:The Wikipedia Adventure for there are some short and fun exercises on neutrality, verifiability, collaboration, research and sourcing. Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:32, 25 March 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Hello, I'm Abequinn14. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Philippines national football team— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Abequinn14 (talk) 13:41, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alexandra Eala


The article Alexandra Eala has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable tennis player who fails to meet WP:NTENNIS and WP:GNG"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Adamtt9 (talk) 22:15, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello Adamtt9,

I updated her profile to avoid deletion for the page. I guess winning Les Petit As at age of 12 is notable for a tennis player. I'm still new in providing information for any pages but this is one way I could learn more from this kind of scenario.

Hope we could agree on some level since I rely more on feedback.

Thank you.

Nomination of Alexandra Eala for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexandra Eala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alexandra Eala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Adamtt9 (talk) 12:03, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Panguil Bay Bridge


A tag has been placed on Panguil Bay Bridge requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.roadtraffic-technology.com/projects/panguil-bay-bridge-northern-mindanao/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 16:01, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Question
May I ask the link on where you are getting the information about COVID-19 patients in the Philippines?

Thanks :-) Aesyeo (talk) 16:07, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Aesyeo talk, I used this website https://ncovtracker.doh.gov.ph/.

Sorry again for the disturbance, but I'm also checking out that page but can't seem to find out information similarly to what projected in the table. (PH No.-Age-Hospital etc.)

It would be a great help if you can help me find those on that link.

Currently, I'm into identifying people behind those numbers, especially the frontliners, so your help would be appreciated.

Thank You Very Much! Aesyeo (talk) 13:42, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello Aesyeo (talk), I rely some information from DOH and Health Workers through their Viber group (PH COVID-19 Health Workers). You

may add that group by searching to the Viber. They posted bulletin sealed and approved by DOH. 13:23, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Thank You So Much 😁😁😁 Aesyeo (talk) 06:52, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Alex Eala copyright infringement
Greetings. I noticed that the text you added on Alex Eala's page about her 2022 US Open – Girls' singles win was directly copied from the Rappler article that you cited, without quotation marks or in-text attribution. In adherence to WP:NFC and WP:CV, I have deleted the content. Feel free to re-add it but rephrased. Do not be a lazy editor. Thank you. signed,Pat talk 14:33, 13 September 2022 (UTC)


 * ok Atikono1 (talk) 03:20, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)