User talk:Atjaffery/sandbox

Peer Evaluation
I thought you had great content and did an awesome job at making a draft that could already be implemented into your article. I like that you embedded your addition with hyperlinks to other Wikipedia pages. I would just suggest to keep doing what your doing and stick to the facts without being opinionated. Good job! Jackson Francis (talk) 05:28, 18 November 2017 (UTC)Jackson Francis

Abigail Rankin Peer Review
Your article changes are good. I would, however, be cautious about discussing shifts in the field of anthropology as such without any citations. It might be better to talk about forensic anthropology and digital anthropology simply as newer additions to the field instead of saying that they represent a shift, as that would be easier to cite and is less up for interpretation. Make sure you proofread and use commas where they are necessary. Be careful to make your sentence structure and vocabulary easy to follow, as making your writing too complex can make your article difficult to parse for somebody who may visit the page to learn about the topic for the first time. Good article.

Aarankin (talk) 21:58, 18 November 2017 (UTC)