User talk:Atlan/Archive14

Re: Lucky Strike
Why did you Undo my addition of "Home of the Brave" to "Cultural References"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.115.251.159 (talk) 17:49, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

MMA Event Notability
You are invited to join the discussion at WT:MMA. Kevlar (talk) 18:37, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Re: Romanizations of Japanese titles
Wait, really? When and where was this? Maybe it's old enough that we can start some kind of review? If consensus has really allowed something like that, it's got to be fought at every possible moment. These "second" romanizations are almost always unhelpful bloat (good exception: an official romanization for a Japanese-based title might be inaccurate, like with Chohmakaimura). Despatche (talk) 01:14, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I actually had no idea that page existed; everyone just talks about the various MOS pages.


 * ...Oh, please forgive me for the mess I've made on that talk page now. :( Despatche (talk) 02:10, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Re: Game titles again
They are not "Japanese-language titles", they are "titles of the game used in Japan"; there's a difference. We are an English-language encyclopedia about potentially everything. There's nothing wrong with tracking any given official release of a product, as we do all over the place, regardless of whether the country/ies in question are known to "speak English" predominantly. Unless there's some guideline specifically forbidding this practice? I'm going to at least add the English form of the titles back, mostly because you also reverted some key information about the game's release. (Why even bother with non-American or European dates, then? And what about the fact that only a small portion of Europe actually speaks English natively?) Despatche (talk) 17:20, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Yet again, a blunder by me. How did I never see this when I wrote that mess on the talk page?


 * ...However. I know this may sound like it's speaking to the letter, but NONENG is not quite what it seems. I'm not entirely sure why, but it's specifically talking about writing systems, not titles.


 * "These foreign language titles should only be included if the game was originally released with that title; if a game was originally titled using the Latin alphabet, it is not necessary to include the name of the game in any other writing system."


 * Either way, I think a case could be made for these NBA games. They're American-made games, but on Japanese-made platforms. Sega has only one page for a list of games, and it's specifically for all Japanese efforts. Quite honestly, I think that alone should be a huge exception for the NONENG, if not simply the idea of tracking every given name of a product. We need a discussion on this, and some kind of consistency needs to be thought over.


 * (I'm a little offended that you suggest I'm looking for special treatment about anything. I'm looking for consistency between one product and another, and respect for all languages and countries that receive a given product (because those are a lot easier and more sensible to deal with than events and concepts); again, we are an English-language Wikipedia about potentially everything. We should not choose some facts and ignore others for the sake of pure opinion. Let it be clear that I would suggest to the Japanese Wikipedia that their article on Bulls vs Blazers should use the original US and EU title as a default.) Despatche (talk) 18:11, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

You've got mail!
 Sports guy 17 :)  (click to talk • contributions) 23:52, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Reverted edit?
Why did you revert my edit on User:Jimbo Wales?? It was a totally ok edit. All I said is, "Wikipedia can always be improved!" (edit here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Jimbo_Wales&diff=586166312&oldid=586078524).

Jimbo clearly says: "You can edit this page! Really, you can! If you would like to, please feel free to do so. Make an edit! Make several edits! After all, that is what Wikipedia is all about."

I don't see what I did wrong.

Newyorkadam (talk) 21:13, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Newyorkadam
 * It's still Jimbo's personal page. By edit, Jimbo means "fix the page" or "make it prettier", not "put words in my mouth". I also wouldn't mind if anyone came along and fixed a userbox or a spelling error on my user page. But if someone added "Wikipedia is great!" to it or something like that, it's a different matter because it expresses an opinion and implies that that opinion is mine. --Atlan (talk) 22:01, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually, no, you're wrong. Jimbo specifically says, "I like to keep it a certain way (simple and free from anything that requires a div tag, style, or template)". By saying 'Make an edit', Jimbo means that you can contribute to his page in a way that will improve it. My edit did exactly that. I did not put words in his mouth at all. Newyorkadam (talk) 23:22, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Newyorkadam
 * The text you edited is written by Jimbo, and it is written in the first person. If you add to that text, it is just as if Jimbo says it, BECAUSE IT'S WRITTEN IN THE FIRST PERSON. So yes, you are putting words in his mouth. If you do not understand this simple concept, then please don't ever edit other people's user pages.--Atlan (talk) 23:43, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Then give me an example of a valid edit on Jimbo's user page please. Newyorkadam (talk) 23:48, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Newyorkadam
 * Basically anything else is acceptable. For instance, in the text you edited, at some point he says "I trust you". A good and acceptable edit would be to link this to WP:AGF. This is already the case but it serves as a good example. The only thing you shouldn't do is to alter or add to things he writes in the first person (which is basically the entire page). But why do you even care? Of all the things you could do on Wikipedia, editing Jimbo's user page is about the least important I can think of.--Atlan (talk) 23:59, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Because the point of Wikipedia is to contribute and learn, and that's exactly what I did. And Jimbo specifically asks for contributions. Newyorkadam (talk) 00:03, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Newyorkadam
 * I just happened to see this discussion. I find two things wrong with Newyorkadam's edit: First it repeats "can always": can always use more faithful editors. It is, after all, a permanent work-in-progress. Wikipedia can always be improved! Second if something is a a permanent work in progress it stands to reason that it constantly changes and can always be improved, so the latter does not have to be stated explicitly. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις  19:41, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Camping
– Connormah (talk) 23:07, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Petrb's User Page
Hello, I don't want to start a edit war with you, however, there's no reason to undo the edit, it isn't vandalism. When ever I edit someone else's user page, I always let them know on their talk page and what edit I've done. And if the user doesn't like the edit he/she can undo it. Seqqis (talk) 04:53, 18 January 2014 (UTC)


 * How about you just don't do it so there's nothing for them to undo. Or ASK FIRST and then edit their user page if it's okay. It's not your business whether someone else has articles they created on their page or not. Your editing is contrary to WP:UP and is disruptive if you don't stop.--Atlan (talk) 12:35, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Land Maker EU title screen.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Land Maker EU title screen.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:06, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

SMJ Examiner
On top of the things you mentioned at WP:AN, this account created Requests for bureaucrapshit/SMJ Examiner (not a typo) with the code  I blocked the user as a disruptive sockpuppet and have requested checkuser. Nyttend (talk) 22:42, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * He claims to be Shalom Yechiel, although I don't know if there is any reason to believe him.--Atlan (talk) 00:00, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Re:WT:RfA
Sorry Atlan, I hope you didn't mind my comments at WT:RfA. Actually I'm trying my best to fix the issue. And we must not fight among ourself. If we won't solve the problem then it is possible that no one will try to run for adminship due to the nature of unfriendly critisim. I don't know if you're an admin or not but just imagin yourself on the same place Alan is now. You will never like if someone say "you are too inexperience". When I joined Wikipedia, I dreamt to become an admin like Dennis, Kudpug, Drmies etc. But now the dream has become a nightmare. I hope, you might understand. Sorry if I've hurt you.  Jim Carter (from public cyber)  14:01, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * I do not agree this an issue that needs fixing, nor does anyone else besides you in the thread you started. While I may not like someone telling me "you are too inexperienced", it certainly wouldn't hurt my feelings. I would also expect such comments, since running for RFA means asking other editors their opinion about you, good or bad. If you cannot handle negative feedback and would even go so far as calling it a nightmare, you should NEVER run for RFA as you are clearly not cut out for adminship.--Atlan (talk) 14:13, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Have you seen earlier RfAs?? If you have then you might not have commented. See RfA of the past. And then let me know if the critism are over the limit or not. Though I know nowadays torture is far more less than it was once. I believe, everyone should be respect candidates even if he's making a mistake. I'm not coward, but over the limit crtisim is not what one should expect.  Jim Carter (from public cyber)  15:01, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, I've been on Wikipedia for 12 years which is before RFA even existed. You however, have not and the only reason you suddenly bring up earlier RFA's is because Kudpung mentioned those on WT:RFA. So what about the earlier RFA's? Those are in the past. Aren't you complaining about RFA's in the present? Do you think your complaint is valid because RFA was bad 5 years ago? Because it's not. You're not making any sense and your original complaint has no merit, which is why no one agrees with you and why your thread is now devolving into a string of jokes. Please move on rather than badgering me about it.--Atlan (talk) 15:10, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Drug user
Freud is primarily known as the founder of psychoanalysis. You dogmatically exclude Freud's well-documented cocaine use as the possible source for any of his psychoanalytic insights. Your comments and deletions do not display your understanding of the subject matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HHofmeister (talk • contribs) 12:05, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Category:Drug user
I've nominated the category for deletion: Categories for discussion/Log/2015 January 13. Skyerise (talk) 20:24, 13 January 2015 (UTC)