User talk:AtlantaResearcher

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, AtlantaResearcher. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.  Ravensfire  (talk) 04:35, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Brian Evans (singer). Bbb23 (talk) 14:00, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

I am neutral, and I have nothing to do with the artist other than attempting to update this individuals page, which the Wikipedia page related to this very page states it seeks more information on. So that's what I did, and yet you continue to delete well sourced updates for reasons I can only assume are personal. Otherwise, it doesn't make a lot of sense. I have o connection to Brian Evans, Dog The Bounty Hunter, Beth Chapman, William Shatner, Carrot Top, or any of those mentioned in these updates that merely state facts, which I thought Wikipedia was about. Regardless, I have contacted Wikipedia Foundation directly with print outs of the "after edits" and "before edits," and a full transcript of the "View History" section to them to decide upon. What is the point of someone editing a page, learning all of the "how to's" about it, when all that work and research, which took me HOURS to do, is just tossed aside, with a false allegation levied against the person, me in this case, from working on the page? Why would anyone want to spend the kind of time that I did to have someone just delete accurately sourced information? It makes absolutely no sense to me, but I have been in communication, both ways, with Wikipedia and this is being looked into.

Sockpuppet investigation
Hell in a Bucket (talk) 19:53, 2 February 2020 (UTC)