User talk:Atlantis100

Welcome
Hello, Atlantis100, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- The Red Pen of Doom  17:15, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Copyright problems with File:The Glen as it appears on Google maps.png
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:The Glen as it appears on Google maps.png, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:The Glen as it appears on Google maps.png appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:The Glen as it appears on Google maps.png has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:The Glen as it appears on Google maps.png and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:The Glen as it appears on Google maps.png with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:The Glen as it appears on Google maps.png.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 03:13, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Death of Savita Halappanavar
While it is clear that you want to place the content at Death of Savita Halappanavar "in context" - you cannot be the one who does so. You need to cite and attribute such analysis and commentary to reliable sources who make the claims. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  18:45, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * that fact that you are using "is related to SH" and the source isnt is flat out proof that you are conducting WP:OR. revert yourself or find a source that specifically make the connection to the subject of the article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  21:10, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

I have reverted your recent edit as it restored multiple cases of violation of WP:COPYRIGHT. I dont know if you are the one who initially added the improper content, but restoring copyright will also lead ot you being blocked. be more careful. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  14:08, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Edit war warning
Your recent editing history at Abortion in the Republic of Ireland shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

You cannot remove the undue template until the issue has been resolved on the talk page. Binkster was objecting to onesided quotes. My objection is the undue focus on recent events. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  19:36, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The discussion is here Talk:Abortion_in_the_Republic_of_Ireland. And the fact that your edit has been questioned and reverted by multiple editors is a clear sign that there is no consensus. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  19:38, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)