User talk:AtmajaIW

March 2021
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision diffs
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! - wolf  17:26, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Marines, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Please discuss these radical changes on the article's Talk page and seek consensus from other editors.  General Ization Talk  05:36, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing.  General Ization Talk  05:38, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

If you continue to remove content from articles without explanation, you will likely be blocked from editing.  General Ization Talk  05:52, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at List of active United States Marine Corps aircraft squadrons, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  General Ization Talk  02:02, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! (Hohum @ ) 21:26, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Marines. - wolf  06:55, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Marines. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -  wolf  06:56, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Added note
For a few months now, you have been repeatedly removing large amounts of content from the article Marines, without explanation. You have been reverted by several editors who have encouraged you to go to the talk page, yet you continually refuse to do so. In fact, since joining Wikipedia, you have not left a single edit summary nor commented on a single talk page. Communication is not optional, especially during a content dispute. This is essentially a slow edit war and it must stop. If you continue with these edits, they will again be reverted and you can expect to be reported for disruptive editing and possibly blocked. I strongly encourage you to stop this behavior and start discussing. - wolf  07:13, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks!

December 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Commander of the Indonesian National Armed Forces. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ckfasdf (talk) 14:04, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Added Note
Just to further clarify, article 10 of official translation of constitution (pasal 10 UUD 1945) as shown here, it clearly said that "The President is the supreme commander of the Army, the Navy and the Air Force." Ckfasdf (talk) 14:09, 10 December 2021 (UTC)