User talk:Atminer

In response to your feedback
Your first contribution to the article you worked on was not fixing an error, it was vandalism, you changed one of the links to something completely different which was entirely irrelevant and quite unpleasant. If you want to fix errors, fix errors, but don't commit vandalism in the process, or you're liable to wind up getting blocked.

BarkingFish 01:18, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

&#160;
 * really?? I fixed something that was a dead link! and added two more relevant links! please send me the link to the vandalism. i don't see any evidence at on http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=English-language_spelling_reform&action=history. IP 65.110.157.61 is also me. what a strange an uncalled-for response yours is, to my feedback. i always hear these pleas from wikipedia for more editors, and more women editors in particular, and this is the kinda waste of my time that makes me really uninterested in helping you all out. enjoy your exclusive nerdboy treehouse, I'll put my energies elsewhere.


 * The person who responded obviously did not follow the link that you changed!! I suppose looking at the URL (http://home.earthlink.net/~disembodiedbrain/eng.htm) makes it sound unpleasant if you have (or have not got!!) a particular mindset. Please don't give up on us, we do -as you have experienced- need people with a more measured approach.It's actually quite funny in a tragic sort of way!!--Harkey (talk) 09:26, 13 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Struck my comment out. Basically the trigger was what was noted from the URL, as Harkey says, and also the fact that your edit was tagged as reverting an Anti-vandal bot, and the bots rarely miss - the chances are it picked up the URL I saw or one of the URLs you changed as being vandalism, and reverted it.  Don't pack up and leave because of me, mistakes happen, you'll get used to it :)  BarkingFish  22:30, 13 March 2012 (UTC)