User talk:Atomslayer

Proposed deletion of Downriver (Book)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Downriver (Book), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TallNapoleon (talk) 04:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)


 * As reviewing administrator, I did not delete it, for the book is notable. The detailed plot discussion is appropriate to a book review, not an encyclopedia article, and has been removed. It seems you were goinh to add references to reviews of the book--please do so. Published reviews, not reader reviews from amazon or a blog.

It appears the author of this book has written other notable books, so you should write an article on him. See our guide to writing Wikipedia articles.DGG (talk) 07:34, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to King has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 18:16, 17 October 2008 (UTC)