User talk:Atrahasis

Welcome!
Hi Atrahasis, and a warm welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you have enjoyed editing as much as I did so far and decide to stay. Unfamiliar with the features and workings of Wikipedia? Don't fret! Be Bold! Here's some good links for your reference and that'll get you started in no time!

""

Most Wikipedians would prefer to just work on articles of their own interest. But if you have some free time to spare, here are some open tasks that you may want to help out :

""

Oh yes, don't forget to sign when you write on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments. And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Once again, welcome! =)

- Mailer Diablo 20:42, 25 May 2005 (UTC)

Race, intelligence and educational reform
Hello, I am an educational reformer who has chosen anonymity for the purposes of on-line collaboration at Wikipedia. Not so much for my own sake, but for that of colleagues who might be embarassed or even lose funding or employment.

Do you know anything about the Pygmalion effect or Hawthorne effect in regards to early childhood or elementary education? I've read isolated reports of significant IQ gains correlated with the attitude or expectation of the tester or teacher.

Arthur Jensen himself - considered the arch-racist by some advocates - reports IQ score gains of 8 or 9 points simply by playing kindly with the children to set them at ease and there was that study nearly 4 decades ago (only one study?!) that told teachers a randomly selected group was brighter; and then the kids showed astonishing increases in academic achievement.

Can you help me dig up research results which have a bearing on this?

Atra's reply
Hello, glad to meet a fellow educator!

The Pygmalion effect to me is basically the positive effect you get on any child when he has a great teacher who isn't mean and who cares that the children really learn to distinguish and sort out the confusing bits...to do that the teacher has to give them attention.

Consider the nature of attention, or even love...it is basically human mental energy that is transferred to another person to shape or mold the recipient's mental and spiritual reservoir. Giving lots of it makes this reservoir larger and shapes it. If it is not fed, it remains small and may even dry up. Energy transfer is a basic feature of the physical world and human society, and I have no doubt that it plays out in shaping IQ's as well. In fact, any and everything that you can possibly think of can probably be boiled down to some kind of energy transfer if you dissect it minutely enough.

You can research the effects of classical music on growing agricultural products, or the effects of talking to plants. I believe such things are relevant to human growth as well. --Atrahasis 15:50, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I forgot to sign my comment above. I call myself Elabro 16:13, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Secrecy
You said on a talk page:


 * But the "veil of secrecy" of things Asian will often confuse people into thinking something is OR or "new knowledge", because it may really bother them that they just can't get an English source or even a written source for X item. If Wikipedia continues to introduce Asia-centric articles as Asia becomes more prominient in world affairs, we'll see more and more instances of Wikipedia in some cases being the first or among the primary sources for a given item, because the veil is being lifted here even where English sources may not readily exist...but we shouldn't let that bother us. --Atrahasis 11:22, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Could you expand? I'm very curious. What is doing the veiling? What is being veiled? Could I please have: Thanks, WAS 4.250 13:40, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) some hand waving generalities so I have a clue to what you are talking about and what you are NOT talking about (social privacy, military security, asian v. western insecurity, etc.)
 * 2) a few pointed examples I can pin down for examination via Googling

Image:Wik aurora1.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Wik aurora1.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 05:10, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Also:
 * Image:Wik aurora2.jpg
 * Image:Wik bon1.jpg
 * Image:Wik bon2.jpg
 * Image:Wik dy5001.jpg
 * Image:Wik dy5002.jpg
 * Image:Wik huron1.jpg
 * Image:Wik huron2.jpg
 * Image:Wik surak1.jpg

The reason for this nomination is that these images are currently orphaned and, with a copyright notice, are at present of limited encyclopedic value. BigDT 05:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Nonsense of Korean farmers
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Korean farmers, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Korean farmers provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Korean farmers, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 08:30, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Korean farmers
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Korean farmers, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 09:59, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Wik sal1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wik sal1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:44, 25 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 01:44, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of File:Wik sal1.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Wik sal1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with no fair use rationale uploaded after May 4, 2006 which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Plrk (talk) 13:30, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Wik sal2.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wik sal2.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Bility (talk) 23:27, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Wik d74.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wik d74.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Bility (talk) 23:27, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Wik d73.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wik d73.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Bility (talk) 23:27, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Wik d71.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wik d71.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Bility (talk) 23:27, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Samgyetang.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Samgyetang.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:13, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Wik mac1.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Wik mac1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:32, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
 * What exactly was the orginal image? --TheImaCow (talk) 19:32, 18 January 2021 (UTC)