User talk:Atrijoshi

November 2009

 * 1) [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. Philip Trueman (talk) 12:04, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Indian National Army
Hello Atri. I reverted your edits on the Indian National Army page. I can understand that you feel the article maybe belittling the INA in its historical context, but I can assure you (as the person who wrote the current version in its entirity) that it is the most NPOV and balanced version of the history of the INA. The article was written by myself after going through numerous scholarly works on the history of the army, and I can assure you it reflects the current scholastic opinion. I can also assure that it is not written with an intention to portray the INA as "axis collaborators" or Fascists, and I think the best evidence I can given you is how different and neutral the article is now (after I rewrote it in 2007) from some of its previous versions. Do get involved in wikipedia, but may I suggest with respect that before editing controversial articles, make a suggestion in the talk pages. (See Talk:Indian National Army). oh! and welcome! rueben_lys 17:25, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Again on INA
Hello Atri, you did not respond to my earlier comments. However, I will again ask you to desist from editing based on personalviews, which would be considered biased, especially you are making edits that are quite contrary to highly acclaimed academic work on the INA. I dont understand what you wish to imply by inserting "obviously" before the sentence on Fay's analysis of the impact of the INA, but if you wish to imply that Fay as a westerner would write a biased history, I would ask you to read Fay's work before making ill-judged edits. rueben_lys 17:09, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

April 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe this important core policy. -- Eraserhead1 &lt;talk&gt; 17:25, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Template:Indcom, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Template:Indcom was changed by Atrijoshi (u) (t) blanking the page on 2010-05-02T13:32:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:32, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Claritas (talk) 13:33, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Atri Joshi


A tag has been placed on Atri Joshi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. De728631 (talk) 13:39, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, instead of writing it yourself. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. De728631 (talk) 13:39, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

July 2013
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rashtriya_Swayamsevak_Sangh, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 07:22, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions alert
Kautilya3 (talk) 08:43, 15 July 2018 (UTC)