User talk:Attilios/Archives3

Please can you source your articles. What is your source? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 10:03, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Ah that fine. It s always good to hear from you mio amico. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 10:11, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Sassetti Chapel
Going very well! Great article. Not quite finished. Sick. Gotta go to bed. Seeya!

--Amandajm 14:05, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Suasa
Grazie mille per aver fatto la voce, se capiti da queste parti ti faccio una visita turistica premio!!! Ciao, --Accurimbono 20:55, 13 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Ps: ti segnalo la presenza su commons di una pagina in cui ho messo delle foto su Suasa, non so che template si usa qui per inserire il link. Ciao, --Accurimbono 20:57, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Volonté Fistful.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Volonté Fistful.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 00:36, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Sassetti Chapel again
I hope it meets with your approval. I rearranged the pics and list and so on, in accordance with chronology, and left the story of the child to last in the frescoes, even though if you progress left to right, it's second last, so I explained why, within the article. Good work! --Amandajm 13:35, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Helloo!
It is done! I hope that you will excuse the fact that I have omitted one small and valuable artifact. Because of the current situation in the world, I make it a principal not to give the location of small valuables, unless they are safely in a major museum. Last week, two old nuns were murdered for a small reliquary. --Amandajm 12:13, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Chris Claremont
I don't know why you reverted Chris Claremont, but he did have a cameo on this week's episode of Heroes, "Landslide". Be less trigger happy on anon edits please. -- claviola  (talk to me)  17:28, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 * It's an article about a person with a pre-existing section titled "career outside Marvel Comics". This is a notable event in that part of his career. Is it not biographical information? I have seen several other articles with such detailed information. -- claviola   (talk to me)  12:38, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Cast table
Actually, the cast table I converted is the standard for the Film project, but was in the process of being updated to list information for each character at the request of User:Alientraveller. For examples, see the cast sections listed in the film articles on his user page. Your reversion is in error. &mdash;Viriditas | Talk 09:47, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Castelseprio Mediation
This is my second attempt to contact you regarding this mediation, my first was either overlooked or ignored. A mediation request regarding Castelseprio has been in the Cabal since February. In an effort to clear out the backlog older cases like this one need to be handled promptly. I would like to begin mediation immediately but I prefer to have the all parties involved approve of me as a mediator before I begin. If I don't hear back from you soon I will consider your objection withdrawn and close the mediation. Please get back to me as soon as possible (leave your response here, I will be watching). - HammerHeadHuman (talk)(work) 18:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)


 * A preliminary response to the mediation request has been made. Please review it at the above link and comment as you deem necessary. Thanks! - HammerHeadHuman (talk)(work) 18:10, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Two "World Heritage Sites in Italy" templates
Hi Attilios,
 * Template:World Heritage Sites in Italy (5T)
 * Template:World Heritage Sites in Italy (Val di Noto)

At a glance, these templates appear to carry the same content as Template:World Heritage Sites in Italy, so I'm wondering what subtlety I'm missing...? Thanks for enlightenment, David Kernow (talk) 02:15, 21 May 2007 (UTC)


 * ''It's to allow highlighting of the distinct cities (see bottom of page of Caltagirone for example)...
 * Thanks! Now I understand "5T" (Cinque Terre) as well as the Val di Noto reference. I incorporated the Cinque Terre and Val di Noto expansions in the main World Heritage Sites in Italy template and was about to suggest that it could now replace those above, but, looking again at the main template (and others in ) I was struck by the "density" of the list of sites. I began toying with an alternative design here, but it looks unavoidably unwieldy. Does the current World Heritage Sites in Italy seem "dense" to you; and, if so, do you think a version that uses only the article names rather than the official UNESCO names might improve or impair the template...?  Thanks, David (talk) 03:47, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * ...I've added a version using short Wikipedia-article names below the template on at the "here" link in the above. David (talk) 04:09, 23 May 2007 (UTC)


 * ''The idea is good, but frankly I don't like the too spread format. It'd remain in the "continue" list as it's now. Ideas? ...


 * Yes, I agree; I tried condensing the spread format, but it would still be too large. So I've amended World Heritage Sites in Italy to include the Cinque Terre and Val di Noto expansions; would it be okay to use it in place of World Heritage Sites in Italy (5T) and World Heritage Sites in Italy (Val di Noto)...? Yours, David (talk) 12:30, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Re Italian Sites

 * ''I had tried to modify the template exactly the way you did now, but the one who believed to be its lord ath the time reverted it. This is why I added those two version. Happy now, it's perfect. Ciao and good work. --Attilios 09:33, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Glad you approve. Thanks for your friendly messages! Best wishes, David (talk) 09:48, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Raffaello da Montelupo and Taddeo Zuccari
Hello Attilios! I just wanted to make sure I understood why you removed the place of birth and place of death from the introduction paragraph to the article I wrote on Raffaello da Montelupo. I know that "da Montelupo" means "from Montelupo" but not everyone will have that understanding. Also, you removed Orvieto as his place of death. Your edit description said "wikifying." I was wondering if the form of birth/death information, etc. was subject to some policy? Please let me know. Grazie mille! Ho letto che tu sei da Roma? It is one of my favorite cities (I want to retire to Italy someday). Ciao! Nick In BigD (Hey!) 02:43, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Molte grazie for the explanation regarding Wikistyle for birth/death information, etc. I have been working on a number of bios, including Italian Renaissance artists, so it is good to know. (I have also been trying to add images from Wikimedia Commons to some of the Vasari artists that had no illustrations). Yes Rome is a wonderful city - I was there in 1987 (5 days), 1996 (two weeks) and 2004 (1 week). My favorite architect there is Borromini (Sant'Ivo and San Carlino alle quattre fontane). I must schedule another visit soon. Buona giornata! Nick In BigD (Hey!) 16:21, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello again - just wanted you to know that the error you corrected regarding the "Il" preceding "Crocifissione" on the image accompanying the Taddeo Zuccari article was the result of my copying verbatim the caption from the image I pulled from Wikimedia Commons. Your edit commentary suggested a certain level of frustration with those of us who are not fluent in Italian (Aaahhh... if one could get rid of those typos from people ignoring Italian language....) I certainly did not intend to "ignore" Italian language, but was probably too inclined to to accept the grammar of the Wikimedia Commons originator (who claims "Questo utente può contribuire con un Italiano di livello intermedio"). I will certainly try to be be more careful in the future but can't make any promises. Nick In BigD (Hey!) 22:05, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Mountain categories
Hi Attilios. I wonder if you have seen my query on []. There seems to be a visual problem - it looks bad - if these category lists are composed of mountain names with a mixture of initial letters, ie if we have Mont Blanc under 'M' and Monte Disgrazia' under 'D'. If all Italian mountains are going to be changed like Monte Disgrazia being moved from 'M' to 'D', it might be over-complicated, messy and hard to find the peak you want (as an English speaker). At present the Mountains of Italy category list is a mess in this regard as well as being inconsistent (some are listed under the initial letter, some aren't). What do you think? Ericoides 13:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the response, Attilios. I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree! Ericoides 13:58, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Perugia references
Hi Attilios, in the last few days I've worked to reference the article Perugia. Most of the work is done but there are still a few improvements to do. When I perused the history of the contributions I noticed that you've been one of the most active editors. So I'm here to ask if you could cite the sources of your contributions in the section Main sights of the article Perugia (e.g. I havent yet found anything in my trusted sources about a marketplace in the area of San Domenico). Yours faithfully, --Grifomaniacs 22:10, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Well done, you did a great work. However I think that the section with the books should be named bibliography. In fact this a list of books on the same topic not necessarily referred to in the article. Regarding Foligno I think that the abstracts at the top of the article would be as clear as possible. Therefore I paid a visit also to Umbria and there are serious matters in the section People of Umbria.--Grifomaniacs 18:07, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Perugia Cathedral is a great article. I checked it and added a reference. Cheers,--Grifomaniacs 22:49, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Assissippi
Yeah, I knew something was wrong but I knew you would find it and fix it! Try spelling Woolloomoolloo. One of the ls is singular, but I can never remember which. (It's a harbourside suburb of Sydney, used to be smelly old dockland with noisy pubs, now it's fashionable and priced out.) Pity, I like smelly old docklands. You can always buy a good meat pie! (which, smothered in tomato gooey sauce, is the Australian quick snack) Can you believe there actually was no article  on Italian Renaissamce painting??

Just tell me you like it! --Amandajm 01:03, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Viviers, Ardèche
I've reverted your recent change to this page. For such an extensive deletion, maybe you could put your reasons in the article's talk page. Cheers, Kiwipete 09:04, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

No problem
I too have a short list of good editors whose recent contributions I occassionally sift through. (Improving Wikipedia can be hard work, but its good to know there are other editors trying!) I have been working on sorting out the feudal structure of Italy in the 9th and 10th centuries. You can look at these pages, if you'd like: March of Carniola, March of Istria, March of Tuscany, March of Friuli, March of Verona, March of Ivrea, March of Turin, March of Montferrat, and March of Genoa. I also noticed how you've been working to move ecclesiastical history stuff from city articles to their own articles and removing Catholic POV statements from them. I have been thinking that a concerted effort needs to be made to improve the pages on church history which have apparently only grabbed the interest of very devoted Catholic editors. (I am thinking about articles on saints.) The structure of the Catholic church played such a prominent role in medieval Europe; its diocesan articles deserve to be better and more historical. Anyways, ciao and good work. Srnec 22:47, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Una problema
Cremona Cathedral (it's stunning!)...the description, and what my eyes inform me do not match! It is not the upper loggia which is Renaissance in style, but the upper section of the building, including its pediment. I'll write a different description, and see how you like it. --Amandajm 04:06, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Cremona again
OK! From this distance and from the few photos I can find (Flikr) my impression is this:-
 * Church begun early 1100s, west front probably complete by about 1120 and perhaps repaired changed later in the century, faced in marble and given upper galleries (which is what we would call them in English.).
 * North transept, facade built late 1100s and has remained intact
 * Baptistery built, say 1200, intact
 * South transept facade 1200s, intact apart from two doors which have been blocked up and a marble plinth.
 * two story porch around west door, 1200-1300 and incorporating earlier elements.
 * The vault of the chancel, what remains seems to be 1300s
 * The tower, 1200-1300s
 * Loggias on either side of the main porch built in 1400s. Connecting to the Campanile.
 * Facade extended in the late 1400s or early 1500s then doodahed up a bit more in the 1600s
 * Baroque decoration of the interior left much of the Gothic of the 1300s intact, but transformed it with overlays of decoration.

This is my reconstruction of what might have happened. It's not just the combo of the Baptistry and the Main facade that is pretty specky, it's also the combo of South transept front and Baptistry, and the combo of Tower, North transept front and the loggias on several adjacent buildings which are part of a brilliant cityscape.

At least, that's how it looks from 8,000 miles away. Would you do some more homework to check my dates and facts, pleeease?

--Amandajm 09:16, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * specky as in spectacular

Dunno wot this refers to, ajm
You have deleted images of details in high resolution that are IMPOSSIBLE to find anywhere, and I took them PERSONALLY in the museum. Art critics and historians are frequently in desperate need to see the details, and such images are incredibly precious.

Wikipedia is about comradeurship, adding, sharing and cooperating, not destroying without even understanding what you are doing; it is not about policing and imposing. You should contact those who take care to create new pages with your advice first, make a suggestion and work together. That is called civilized communication, instead of arbitrarely damaging not only someone's work, but depriving other people of the most precious information. The whole spirit of this site is to create collective intellegence, not to satisfy someone's policing ambitions.

Perhaps you should get these prinicipals first in your mind. And the POV you refered too is for controvercial subjects, well, Annunciation is not such, at least it has not been until someone like you just deletes precious knowledge without giving a thought of what he is doing.

Be considerate, it helps.

Annunciation
naughty Attilios! You were too rude! You were almost as rude as I am when I remove something and write "utter codswallop!" Now, if this is the same person whose images you deleted, you should tell her nicely how to get them back! About the language, yes, you are right. I will try to be more gentle. meanwhile, what about Cremona? --Amandajm 12:59, 25 May 2007 (UTC) PS. I'm just going to have to tell her that Wikipedia is full of pedantic people with A.S., who love humanity, but forget that they do, when they are confronted with things that don't quite fit the system. Oh no! no! no! You can't do that here, not on wikipedia you can't! ;)   --Amandajm 13:05, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Attilios!
out of her mind? Mate, you're out of your tree! That is not a nice thing to say! I'm gunnahavvanuddaloo-kat that article and write her a little note....Now, just get out of my hair for about half an hour. Nonna will talk to you later! OK Ciao!--Amandajm 13:11, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Yoo hoo!
OK, I left a message. I hope everything is sorted out. I was fairly polite. I should have been more positive, but I forgot how. Bugger. The rule is, say nice things first...the rule is say, nice things first...I'll do it better next time. ...I was really awfully rude to this well-meaning and very clever (it seems) young chap of 20 on wiki the other day, and he returned my message so politely... I must try to be positive! I must try to be positive! Now get on with Cremona! --Amandajm 14:00, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

You ask me what I'm working on
I need a little break from serious things sometimes so I go somewhere entirely different and then, Oh no, it gets serious again.

There is an article Roof which seems to have been written first by an American, and then by an Australian builder. So I sorted it out, and removed all the references to Australian trade names etc. Put in lots of pictures. I thought they might be cross with me, but they loved it! Luckily, I am quite technical and i know a little bit about roofing.

It's not worth getting too pedantic about either style or citing references when you are dealing with people who are writing from thir own practical experience. A good example is Bee. There are about a million pages. They are all written by someone who obviously knows the subject in minute detail. I don't really think it matters very much if people with vast knowledge share it through this encyclopedia. It's not an academic subject! For the most part these practical people are imparting knowledge that no-one is going to argue with.

Not like some subjects. Renaissance architecture had a pic of a Russian cathedral. It has been removed. Why? It was "outrageous"!...? OK, know i'm going back to remove the outrageous statements from Ichthys. --Amandajm 14:58, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

That annunciation, etc.
Hi Attilio,

I had a look at the article and drafted some fairly extensive advice on how the article should be made more encyclopedic, beyond the good work you were doing in bringing it into line with the conventions. I posted a little bit of that, together with some sound advice to the editor. But actually I became more concerned about copyright and sourcing issues, which I commented on more extensively. Anyway, it does look like the revert war problem has gone away. It’s a shame she’s finding it difficult to adapt to the Wikipedia working habits, and was so ready to imagine that you were acting in some destructive manner. (She must have good taste: her previous edits were to Schoenberg’s Moses and Aaron—I heard the opera for the first time last year. I admit I had some trepidation a whole opera’s worth of late Schoenberg seemed likely to be very heavy going. But I was enchanted throughout.)

The other thing to say is thank you for the barnstar. Coming from you it was really appreciated. I am sorry I didn’t reply at the time, but I was in a very introverted mood where I was finding it hard to make even simple contacts with people. Thanks again! And keep up the usual good work! —Ian Spackman 16:16, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

You're absolutely right, but softer is better ;)
Dear Attilios, I quite agree with you. The Van Eyck's Annunciation article needed a quick intervention and you've done the best things to do. However Gradiva is a new user and doesn't have an high level of seniority like you. Gradiva may not understand as fast as other more experienced users the importance of the guidelines and this is our attempt to give a guidance to her/him. Moreover this is not such a big deal who is right and who is not (because this is too much obvious you're right!), and that's better to clarify in our interventions that our purpose is to give only constructive criticism. And I sincerely think that a softer approach would have generated a more positive outcome of the Gradiva's unsuitable reaction. Hoping to have helped you, yours --Grifomaniacs 21:20, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Martyrdom Michelangelo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Martyrdom Michelangelo.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 23:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Speeeak to me, Attilios!
My dear little Attilios, I take back everything I said. You were right! Absolutely right! To-tal-ly im-pos-si-bull! Forgive me for being rude to you.... (but you really do rush in with your boots on) ....

The article is all fixed now! Johnbod to the rescue.... He's done a lovely job... as long as he doesn't fix my articles.... You should go back and look at it now, but try not to make him cross!

Have you checked on beeyootiful Cremona, or what? --Amandajm 11:43, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Mme80.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Mme80.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:54, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

DYK

 * My congratulations on this recognition. Bravo Attilios! Best regards,--Grifomaniacs 11:57, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Emmanuelle primo 4.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Emmanuelle primo 4.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse@ 23:04, 28 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your effort to provide a fair use rationale for this image. I would like to mention there are several necessary components in a fair use rationale, maybe this template can be helpful to you. – Ilse@ 23:14, 28 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The fair use rationale should explain what purpose the image serves and in which article this should be allowed under fair use. – Ilse@ 10:57, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi Attilios!
Stop sulking and tell me what you thought about my comments on Cremona. --Amandajm 00:52, 29 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the hug! I am down in the dumps. I have a funeral tomorrow, of a young man who has been quadriplegic for several years, but never ceased to keep everyone entertained. We will all miss him a great deal.


 * About Cremona, I sent you what I imagine to be the facts, but they are drawn from looking at a few photos. I can't determined if my conjectures are true or false. Thee may be something in Italian that you can read to confirm my ideas. I can't work on it properly until I know. Aspects of the upper part of the main facade are very like Sant' Agostino in Rome. I wonder if it is the same architect.

--Amandajm 10:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Torgiano needs to be wikified again!
Hi Attilios. Thanks for you help with Limigiano and Castelbuono (my English is definetly limited, at least in writing). Please look into Torgiano, if you can find the time. I added quite a bit and I'm shure it needs to be wikified again (-: Thanks for your work. -Zyance 21:26, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanx! –Zyance 09:50, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Moby Dick comics.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Moby Dick comics.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:58, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Thankyou!
I am delighted! But I want you to do one little thing for me.... go back to my page and change the word un-valuable to in-valuable, because I am sure that is what you meant to write! Back to my referencing! --Amandajm 08:45, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Re Antonello
you're perfectly right, of course.. I wil fix it! --Amandajm 11:45, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Use of "Label" column in tables
The only reason I have to use the Label column (where I typically place arbitrary numbers) is that I find it easier for the eye to find the row if editing is needed. Maybe there is a way to place a # that automaticall shifts if the list is expanded or shortened? CARAVAGGISTI 19:13, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

On cleaning up Sandro
Thank you for all your good work, and most recently for this. I would not have known where to start. Best wishes, JNW 03:41, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi, Attilios!
Is everything OK with you?

I checked out the article, read it thoroughly. I can't find any problems with the style, the grammar etc. I didn't even find any typos. This person specialises in editorial rather than contributing material. I have left a message asking for an explanation. He has another request for an explantion... but the other one definitely needs a tidy up:- "Mile End Road" was written "mile end road" for example. I think the request is nonsense. I'll put it on my watch list to make sure no weell-meaning person chops it to pieces. --Amandajm 05:50, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I just had a message from Trusilver apologising for unfortuunate action and saying that he had three monitors open and accidentally tagged the wrong one. He reread our article and said it was "perfect".--Amandajm 01:59, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Panzerfaust soldier.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Panzerfaust soldier.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Polarlys 00:29, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Gotta reeeally bad case ....
....of the blanky-blanks! Oh those those dreaded blanky-blanks!

Those horrible blanketty-blanks! You stamp on them good and proper, Attilios!

--Amandajm 02:23, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

World championship cycling medals
Thank you for the message. The rest of the medals I added, I used the gold-silver-bronze order. I see you already corrected the ones where I used chronological order, thank you for that. --Pie.er 12:54, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Capitalization of Italian films
I've seen it both ways in the literature, but it's likely the capitalized versions are incorrect. Is there any particular reason that Italian films are never capitalized? Savidan 15:53, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Haha...fair enough. Savidan 16:57, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Vittore Carpaccio
Done! and I have worked on the image and improved the poor colour and tone a good deal. It always loses a little of the resolution, but that doesn't matter at low resolution. I never delete the original more detailed upload. What a gruesome picture that is of St george and the dragon, particularly the half eaten female, still in the remains of her chemise. Keep up the good work! --Amandajm 14:01, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Gaetano Bedini
Ok per il testo da pulire, ma mi sembra non c'entri nulla col toglere addirittura foto.. --87.1.223.176 14:50, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 1. Non capisco perchè continui a rimovere la genealogia episcopale. E' una policy di en.wiki o è un tuo capriccio?
 * 2. in questo ultimo tuo ultimo edit hai rimosso anche una foto che cmq ritengo importante e non vi è motivo per rimuoverla
 * Ti ringrazio per le spiegazioni. --87.1.223.176 14:57, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Edit summary
You placed this edit summary at Bishop of Porto and Santa-Rufina: there's only one word to define this stuff taken from Catholic Enc.... it begins with "Sh" and finishes with "it". Now, you and I have already discussed your wish simply to cut references of this kind from articles. You didn't actually reply to my point (which is that you had cut too much). Need I emphasize that edit summaries are not to be used in this way? Charles Matthews 18:17, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of San Zeno
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on San Zeno, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because San Zeno is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting San Zeno, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate San Zeno itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:24, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Basilica di San Zeno
It is done, Bambino! I have expanded the architecture of the facade considerably. I had fum working out what some of your not-quite English expressions were intended to mean. I have rejigged the photos and made many of them smaller, reordering the text to fit the pix in better. I expanded the interior view, on the other hand, because we need to see the details, but the tower, Mon Dieu! it was so large that it dominated the whole page! It would even scare the birds away. I hope that you like it.

Oh, another small thing, about "narthex". A narthex is a horizontal porch or hallway right across the front of the church, and not a very common feature at all. The big internal hallway that goes across the front of St Peter's, Rome, is called the Narthex. That church of Santa Maria in Bologna is rare in having a Narthex and an Atrium, the enclosed courtyard in front of the church. There are not many atriums either. San Clemente has an atrium. Santa Maria in Cosmedin has a narthex, where that beastly Bocca della Verita thing is, and there is another very old Ch. nearby, is it S.M in Velabrio? which also has a narthex, built onto the side of an ancient Roman structure (I'm not sure if I have the right church there). Anyway, a structure that juts out from the building over the door is generally just called a porch, even if it is enormous. "Narthex" implies that it is partially enclosed. You know the transverse entrance to Palazzo Massimo? That's a narthex.

--Amandajm 08:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Tempio malatestiano.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tempio malatestiano.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 11:09, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

It's San Giorgio!
I raced into both Prassede and Pudenziana just before getting on the train to go to Florence. There was a yung man standing outside Santa Pudenziana who said "No! No! you cannot go in! It is im-pos-sible!" ....because someone was practising on the organ for a recital.... So I gave him the comeback "yes, but in Rome, everything is possible!" He raised his super-cool shades, gave me a look of studied boredom and said "cinque minuti". (is that right?) Anway, I looked at the fabulous mosaic, which was all I had time for! Santa Prassede is absolutely wonderful! The mosaics around the chancel arch are spectacularly Byzantine. You suddenly feel as if you've been transported to Ravenna. I think you are right about Santa Prassede having a narthex. As for my "funniness" you will perhaps explain. My neighbour always calls my son "mio bambino" and feeds him on pasta and pizza, both of which are terribly bad for him. Well, I will look at one of your other little projects that i haven't seen yet. This Italian series is really coming on nicely! --Amandajm 04:20, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Santa Maria dei Servi
It's done! I remember this church well. I had such a nice time there and met a very interesting woman who said she was so lucky to live in Bologna. She said that every now and then, she would pretend that she was a tourist and wander around, looking at the architecture and artworks.

Anyway, you will see that I have added more information, most of which I got off a site which I have "inline cited".

Do you mind getting back there and making the links work? You can sort out the references to Italian buildings much easier than I can! --Amandajm 06:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

San Zeno
That pic of the tower of the abbey is not a very good pic, and detracts from the interior, which is more important. That is why I reduced it. --Amandajm 06:48, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Attilios, how can anyone be engaged for nine years? It must be a euphemism! I was under the impression that you lived quite close to Rome. I once went to Rome with my husband and, according to him, we earned a plenary indulgence by praying at 40 churches in four days. But we still missed some important ones! I've tried to count up the ones that I remember and I can't get beyond 24 so I think it was an exaggeration! --Amandajm 09:26, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Palazzo del Podestà
"In 1453 Aristotile Fioravanti placed the bell"

Should this read "gave the bell" or "replaced the bell"? --Amandajm 10:29, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Least_we_can_do.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Least_we_can_do.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bigr Tex  20:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Santa Prassede
so glad you enjoyed it! sorry to hear about your sick hungry cross bored tired thirsty friend. It can be very frustrating when you are all those things and out with a person who thinks of nothing but looking at another church and just a few more paintings. My younger son has that trouble with me all the time. My older son is worse than I am. Ciao! --Amandajm 14:45, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Milady 3000 Color.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Milady 3000 Color.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:50, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Gigamesh 3.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Gigamesh 3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Urania 1236.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Urania 1236.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:25, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Volonté Fistful.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Volonté Fistful.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:40, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Barthelemy
As you know, I am usually fine with your edits, but the first batch you did here did have some mistakes that altered the sense, plus I don't think eg: 1456-1469 is best style - like most editors here I prefer 1456-69 (I tried to see what the manual of style says, but it rather surprisingly does not appear to cover this queation). Also I prefer to say that the dates & places of birth & death are unknown rather than just give approximate dates - I think this is more encyclopedic. So that time I just reverted the lot, but I think incorporated some of them in my later edits. This time I have just changed a "before" to "after". All the best, Johnbod 13:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

I asked this. btw Johnbod 13:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Little problem
Santa Maria Maggiore, Gazzo. This link isn't working! I would like some more padding in some of these articles, but can't find any details in books. If I find things in Italian, the process of translation is very tedious! I sit here with a very small dictionary, which doesn't have any nuances so I have to use my imagination, which is just fine if I am also using my memory. --Amandajm 00:31, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Those Renaissance painters
Thank you for making all the links work so nicely! i knew I could rely on you to do it! I have put back the bit about "long and narrow" because it is about composition, and even though people can see it with their own eyes, they don't actually know it unless they are told.

As for the blinking Raphael Rooms, no-one calls them that. They are the Stanze whichich never have an accent in English books, so if you want one, you will have to do it because I will be sure to make it go the wrong direction and then maybe it will offend people. It won't make any difference whatsoever to the way that I pronounce it, either, because I'll say it with an Australian accent. --Amandajm 06:50, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Gothic blooming architecture
Ok! Ok!


 * Do you know anything about the sequence of Gothic architecture in Italy?
 * Has anybody ever put a name to the sequence of Gothic architecture in Italy?
 * Or does Nonna have to invent the terminology as she goes along?


 * Oh,
 * I see you got the link
 * to blink
 * blue
 * instead of pink!

--Amandajm 11:09, 23 June 2007 (UTC)


 * In both England and France, which I know the most about, there is very clear stylistic development. In Northern France, you can set up a series of images of cathedrals and trace a linear development between them. In the South, there were several characteristics that were not found in the North, eg some of the Cathedral (Albi for example) are very fortress-like.
 * In England, you have about 35 relevant very significant churches, including a few major abbeys as well as the cathedrals. (There are also a number of magnificent parish churches). But just to stick to the cathedrals for a minute-
 * They are enormously long, with five or six of them being as long, as the cathedral of Florence. Most of them are more than 100 metres. In every Medieval cathedral except one, (Salisbury Cathedral), the building took hundreds of years to complete. Every building stage was done in a different style, usually with no attempt whatsoever to make things match. The styles are remarkably consistent at any given date. So that I can walk around a building like Canterbury Cathedral and simply look around and say "Those two little towers are Norman, that quire is about 1170, that extension to the quire is a little later in the 12th century, that window is early 14th, the nave is late 14th and that central tower went up in the 15th century." No problem. What's more, the English loved their Gothic, and kept coming up with stunning new ideas, right to the end. The interior of King's College Chapel, 1446-1515 is mind-bogglingly beautiful.
 * But then we come to Italy. I've just looked at a whole lot of pics of Italian Gothic Churches. My conclusion is that style simply didn't develop in the same way. I think it would be impossible to trace a linear development as you can in England and France. I think that it is more regional and personal. There are charcteristics of Italian Gothic which are quite distinctive. One thing that seems weird to a person steeped in English Gothic is that some architectes of the period simply didn't recognise the pointed arch as being necessary for the style. They might simply chose not to use it at all, as at Orvieto. It seems really odd to have a building of that date which hasn't responded to the defining feature of the style, but, that's what happened. In Venice they do odd combos of pointed and round, that are specifically Venetian. There's a type of tracery that occurs in Vnice as well.
 * So, basically, I'm going to have to approach it from a different direction. I'll take a look at the Italian language article. Can you please give me the link to it?

--Amandajm 12:11, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Caproni A.P.1
Hi Attilios - thanks for your help with this article, but please do not edit an article while it is showing an tag - that means that someone else is working on the article and has unsaved edits at the moment. I was working on this (and was going to move it to Caproni A.P.1 when finished) and your edits caused me to lose my work - very annoying!

Anyway, since you're obviously interested in writing about Italian aircraft, you might like to take a look at page 2 of the list of missing aircraft - lots of Capronis and CANTs that still need coverage! Cheers --Rlandmann 21:47, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Gothic architecture
I'm right in the throes of editting it, and I think I'm probably making myself unpopular, but there you go! I'm going to dump stuff in different articles, like I did with the Renaissance article. I've just reconstructed English Gothic architecture which was in three sections, all referring back to Gothic architecture instead of having a page on its own. Gothic is really major in England.

I will definitely get to your Italian Gothic article, but I'll do some more on the parent article first. Cheers!

--Amandajm 10:35, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Autun Cathedral
Well done! There are a couple of very minor, typo or expression corrections, will get back and fix but I'm too busy! It was very clever of you to translate from French! Autun has a stunning interior! I would love to go there. --Amandajm 11:42, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Gothic architecture in Italy
Very good! I'm so glad that you sorted out the various phases. I'll get back to it with a little grammatical editting! --Amandajm 14:36, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

You are perfectly right of course
...but if you crash my mmajor edit, with your piddling little coorrections, I'll take your b barnstar and pin it on your chest and I don't mean your shirt!! --Amandajm 07:54, 25 June 2007 (UTC)


 * It's alright, Darling! i didn't lose anything...I had a few anxious moments about Abbbot Suger!
 * It's about 6.30 pm here. Don't kknow exactly bbecause the clock on the computer always gets behind...I don't know how to speed it up!
 * I am going to cook dinner so if you want to spend half an hour or so doing your tidy little corrections and links, that would be lovely! --Amandajm 08:22, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Banionis.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Banionis.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Qwarc 14:12, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Niccolò dell'Arca
Answer on my talk page. JoJan 16:57, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

IRB World Rankings
Well the article was a stub and it needs expanding and more information needs to be added but what you did was remove information you didn't understand. It is English and I know it might be hard for someone whose english isn't his/her first language to understand but the thing about wikipedia is that articles can be edited and improved and not removed. What you "hid" was information regarding how the ranking points are calculated which when I was writing down took time to fine out the major points before writing it down. If you can improve it Please do so but do not remove information and call me Illiterate Please..Thank you..-- Cometstyles 19:12, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 25th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:21, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Format of Playboy NSS issues
The bold face that you're removing from Playboy model articles was agreed on two years ago. If you'd like to see the discussion it can be found at Talk:Playboy/Archives/2011. Dismas |(talk) 13:02, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

bronzetti sardi
Salve Attilio, ho visto che hai tolto le immagini sui bronzetti sardi, come mai? Anche le immagini raccontano qualcosa e quelle raccontano molto sulla Sardegna di quel tempo. Non vorrei dispiacerti, ma penso che le rimetterò! ciao --Shardan 13:03, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Carlo Maderno
I reverted your edit. First of all, was Italy. Are you joking? Italy didn't exist at that time. Anyway the Ticino territory was already included into Switzerland. (See Battle of Marignano). Cate |Talk 15:47, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Kc-ticket.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Kc-ticket.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 09:55, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Panorama dal Palazzo delle Catene.JPG
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Panorama dal Palazzo delle Catene.JPG, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Panorama dal Palazzo delle Catene.JPG fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: we have deleted it on it.wiki, 'cause its license is not verifiable To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Panorama dal Palazzo delle Catene.JPG, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Image:Panorama dal Palazzo delle Catene.JPG itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:21, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Duchy of Sora
Hi

I'm an italian student and I'm working on many italian pages of it.wiki. Now I'm translating something on en.wiki. I think that you would be useful here for me, and in it.wiki as well. I notice you these voices:
 * 1) Ciociaria in cinematography

I hope we'll work togeather. Bye --Wento 19:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Cathedrals and so on!
Hello Darling! Are you following me around tidying up? Please put back the photo credit to Victoria because the photo requires atribution, in order to use it, and whereevver a person states that, I always try to honour it.

There's more work to be done on Gothic, but I've been stuck into Romanesque architecture which was really rather poor. There's a great deal more to be done. If you would like to choose some of the very best pics of Italian Romanesque, say about six pics, including interiors and a representational campanile, you could leave them in a gallery at the bottom of the article, and it would be sooo kind! --Amandajm 10:17, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Attilios! What great photos! --Amandajm 12:39, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Merckx cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Merckx cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:15, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Architecture
Yes I too have a keen interest in architecture -your work is great particularly those Istanbul mosques. Hopefully we can get those Italian articles translated asap. Keep it up. Ciao! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 11:19, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Ah I got you mixed up I think with another Italian wikipedian who was adding mosques in Turkey. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 16:55, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ondata di piacere.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ondata di piacere.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:43, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

G'Day!
Don't worry about the "hassling"... it was a joke! ;)--Amandajm 11:48, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Merckx cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Merckx cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:09, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:24, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Renaissance painting
Well, you have been having fun with all those links! --Amandajm 08:10, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Johann Ambrosius Bach.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Johann Ambrosius Bach.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Johann Ambrosius Bach.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: superseded by images at Wikimedia commons: and   To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Johann Ambrosius Bach.jpg, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Image:Johann Ambrosius Bach.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 13:51, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Monica Seles 2005.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Monica Seles 2005.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShadowHalo 23:43, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

RE: spellings of tennis players
thank you for your comment. i will definetly take it into consideration! Ô 01:57, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Cacciaguida
Hi Attilios: thanks for your comments;

regarding linking dates; I am following MOS for dates (section 1.9) see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_%28dates_and_numbers%29

For specific categorization of years: see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:People_by_year (section 2)

hope this explains my rationale. Thanks! --FeanorStar7 14:40, 4 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your comment; I didn't realize it hadn't been updated for a while; I have seen both uses for the categories; I decided to be consistent and use the nearest date for the category, since people who are reading the article may expect to see the birth category for that date. Now I'm not so sure; maybe I should put a question on the people by year page to get a definitive answer--FeanorStar7 15:03, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:AmicimieiAttoposter2.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:AmicimieiAttoposter2.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:AmicimieiAttoposter2.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: duplicate file, now orphaned To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:AmicimieiAttoposter2.jpg, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Image:AmicimieiAttoposter2.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:43, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Sorrento linkspam
I've blocked the latest one for a month on your assertion that is a repeat pattern. Given it's an IP it can never be indef blocked unfortunately. When you have a moment can you point me to the earlier insertions. Thanks --Steve (Stephen)talk 21:53, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

New policy about trivia
11:00 (cur; last). . (-2,306) . . Attilios (Talk | contribs) (→Solomon in fiction - removed unrelevant trivia as per WP new policy)

Can you give me the reference to this new policy? Mukadderat 07:53, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Bosco, again
I deleted the section you added, again. I have posted the page for an RFC. Please do not add the information again until some sort of consensus is reached. Any further POV attempts on this issue will be reported as vandalism. --evrik (talk) 18:12, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Translate the entire caption. Give the entire source. Don't inlcude a POV title on the section. It's simple enough. --evrik (talk) 18:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Clearly, this edit is a violation of WP:Civil. --evrik (talk) 19:38, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Please stop driving an edit war, and simply make some better and more neutral text. Work it out on the talk page. What you have is incomplete and full of POV. 18:46, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * FYI. --evrik (talk) 23:27, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: Cacciaguida and the birth and death categories
Hi Attilios: I have a partial answer regarding the linking of dates from some of the people over at the biography assessment project; what follows is my question and their answers. sorry about the layout problems. I can leave Cacciaguida as it stands if you prefer. --FeanorStar7 07:36, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

"What is the rule for assigning birth and death categories when you have a situation like the following: x person (b. c. 1091; d. c. 1155)?

Do you put it in 1090s births and 1150s deaths or 1091 births and 1155 deaths? My impulse has been to put them into the nearest year possible as I expect readers would expect that. Also do you link the dates themselves? I recently had an editor ask me about this. As I am assessing the articles, I like to make sure the appropriate birth and death categories are in place. Please advise --FeanorStar7 05:23, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

I would link the dates and put them in the exact birth and death categories. Just my two cents. Psychless 00:16, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

It's a tough one, and it's been done inconsistently. For a long time I used the exact year, like The Psychless suggests; then I was doing the decade (e.g. 1150s deaths); now I'm back to using the specific year again, when the source gives one year (e.g. born c. 1555). Another problem occurs when you know someone's age at death (common with Renaissance composers) but that gives you two possible birth years. In that case I usually do the "1550s deaths" method. I don't think anyone has come up with a standard. Antandrus (talk) 04:45, 6 July 2007 (UTC)"

Non-free use disputed for Image:Xabaras.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Xabaras.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:12, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Storie dello spazio profondo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Storie dello spazio profondo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Urania 629.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Urania 629.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Troisi postino.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Troisi postino.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:28, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Scala-Stemma.gif
Welcome, and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. An image you have uploaded was marked as having been released by the copyright holder, but no evidence of this release has been provided. If notice of the release is on the copyright holder's website, please link to it in the image summary. If the release is a response to a request for copyright permission, the full request and response must be forwarded to OTRS. If you need help in composing a request, the example requests for permission may be helpful. ShakespeareFan00 12:41, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Image permissions should ideally be via OTRS, I will review the tag. ShakespeareFan00 12:44, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

reverting
Hi Attilios, why did you revert my edit at Province of Trento? It is kind of useful if you give an explanation. Perhaps I should give a more detailed explanation why I put the notes on TN and BZ. I used something like I saw on Santorini, since there is a bit of confusion that exists for foreigners about the different between the Province of Trento vs. Trentino and Province of Bolzano vs. Alto Adige/Seudtirol. Cheers, Icsunonove 01:32, 7 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok, fair enough. I removed it from the BZ page as well. Icsunonove 11:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

coor title
At Google Earth only geographical wikipedia articles with "coor title" coordinates will be published.

Steve9483

I have the opinion, it is better to delete the coordinates from the infobox. Anyhow they are not very important. It is nevertheless better if someone can read Wikipedia article at Google Earth.

Steve9483

I am not pleased that here constantly solid work will be deleted. There is a reason, why I prefer another script at my own article Swisttal Essig. The articles of Wikipedia will not be published at Google Earth using 50.65833°N, 6.88667°W. However it is my interest that a respectable encyclopedia can be read also in a respectable program for satellite  pictures. The coordinates for the Mennonitensiedlung Molotschna are also correct. I can give the confirmation anyhow gladly.

Steve9483

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007)
The June 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 13:20, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Santa Maria della Pieve
Wow! I just looked it up on Google images. You are right. It is one of the most wonderful Romanesque churches. I have been to Arezzo twice, in both cases specifically to look at Piero, and didn't see it! What a pity! --Amandajm 02:38, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I just wrote the above into Romanesque architecture so I hope that you like it! I will return! --Amandajm 09:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi Attilios! Thank you for fixing that. The cycle of the months could either be the Zodiac or Labours of the Months. The other option is to link it to Poor Man's Bible which talks about both. But please dont try to rejig to pics or anything like that in Poor Man's Bible, because it's very easy to throw the whole thing out of plumb. --Amandajm 10:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

bosco
You already did, and I have commented there. I think the word "blackmail" is probably a bit POV without stronger & more detailed sources, but I am generally sympathetic. i a statement in the article that he "never commented on politics", which I doubt very much. cheers Johnbod 18:48, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Ciao Attilios, I would certainly be interested in participating in a cleanup of the Bosco article. I actually owe Evrik some documentation, he requested copies of some presentations at an early Amsterdam LGBT seminar, and I just have not gotten around to sending him the stuff. I am sure we can all co-operate fruitfully. Haiduc 00:10, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 9th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:24, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Andrea_Giani.jpg
I have tagged Image:Andrea_Giani.jpg as replaceable fair use. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. MER-C 13:36, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Forli
Thanks for your revision and advice. Forli.tv 15:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Emmanuelle primo 4.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Emmanuelle primo 4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selectin

518 Media
Am trying to De orphan a article on 518 Media which is apparently the distributor of Wild Blue Yonder. Can i Edit your article to include this info. Is this factually correct?. Also is 518 media a notable distributor to warrant a page in Wiki ?Gs44631 (talk) 10:35, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:J G Ballard.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:J G Ballard.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:58, 18 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nicke L (talk) 21:58, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 19th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:51, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Administrator
I see you have been around for a couple of years and you have many edits, have you considered applying for adminship? &mdash; Raffaello9 | Talk | 23:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Hello
Hello,

I am new to Wikipedia

Please adopt me, i well badly don't know what i'm doing

Joeseth1992 (talk) 18:51, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Quelo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Quelo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:41, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Pierre Berbizier.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pierre Berbizier.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:51, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:46, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)
The November 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 00:06, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Uc47.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Uc47.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 3rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Garrigues
I am currently proposing that the Garrigues page should be replaced by the content now found on the Garrigues (disambiguation) page and the the material presently on the Garrigues page should be moved to a new page to be titled Les Garrigues, Catalonia If you have the time I would appreciate your comments on the Discussion page at Garrigues. I hope you will agree. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 20:07, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

SAS Linate disaster - Gustaffson's maneuver
Hello! Which source told you about Gustaffson's maneuver? That needs to be sourced. You added the info here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Linate_Airport_disaster&diff=81980993&oldid=78706337 - All it needs is a good source :) WhisperToMe (talk) 16:33, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi Attilios!
I haven't heard from you for a while! What interesting thinngs are you doing? Amandajm (talk) 12:37, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Lovely to hear from you! I wish you all the best with your thesis! Amandajm (talk) 13:18, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Sant'Ambrogio, Florence
this was actually PROD'ed. I removed the PROD and did a minimal addition, but it needs someone who knows the subject. DGG (talk) 08:01, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!


Thank you for your encouragement and friendship, as always! I hope you like this tree! it is in a front yard, in a little village, halfway up a large mountain, and is all overhung with tall Australian evergreens. It is quite tall, about 7-8 metres. I don't really know very much about this topic at all! But I have reorganised it into more logical sections and added the pictures that I took, cruising around the streets of the 'Gong last night.

I hope that you have a blessed Christmas and that God will keep you safe, happy and well in the New Year! Amandajm (talk) 11:16, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Italian cinema template
Split by year. Cute isn't it -needs developing but a good start

♦ Sir Blofeld ♦     <font color="Black">Talk? 14:27, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Santa Giulia
Looks good - but others beat me to it! I'll look again later. 00:07, 5 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Just finished St Paul to. 07:14, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

camelot comment
I found your recent comments on Talk:Camelot 3000, a little rude. Please try to play nice with your fellow editors. ike9898 (talk) 00:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Brick Romanesque
Thanks. athinaios | Talk 10:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Tuff and Tufa
Thanks for your work on this change! I've known for a while that it needed doing, but I never quite had the gumption to take it, since so many articles are involved. Mlouns (talk) 17:43, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Belated
Hi, Attilios. I know it's been ages, and this may look like it's coming out of the blue (especially given that circumstances have rendered it belated): Happy New Year! Dahn (talk) 23:41, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Garibaldi
Ciao

Grazie per la tua voce Garibaldi in inglese. La volevo fare io, ma non sono esperto in inglese. Ho aggiunto la foto del Garibaldi che attraversa il canale navigabile di Taranto. Ho visto che sei italiano e di Roma come me. Io ho fatto la voce in italiano, e completato la parte che riguarda l'incrociatore leggero; se vuoi dai uno sguardo

Saluti--Gaetano56 (talk) 12:28, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Cardinal Archetti
I will leave these blanks my dear Attilios,but what do you have against the infobox cardinalbiog ,so you have removed it?I read your user page-you're doing great work,but you can't do all the work that is to be done,so leave some tiny little part to other users,please.If you feel offended from my words you're right because this infobox is made for these articles,it would be beter if you remove cardinalstyles infobox when it is used for dead people,because they haven't any styles except on their thombstone.

P.S. I read really carefully your comments and I find the word nightmarish abusive in bold.I will appreciate if you,being trained and honoured man be more patient when editing articles,which have been written voluntary from younger and unknown users like me.There is a reason in your words,but I don't like the attitude. Drjmarkov (talk) 10:04, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

infoboxes
They are not supposed to contain new information,but to be only a summary,and,excuse me,but what were the mistakes there?I think we should ask for third oppinion about it.

I really feel you are warring with me,and it is not good at all.I will put those infoboxes back-all of them and will mark all the articles for third oppinion and I would like you not to assist to my work any more,if you have arguments use the talk page,please-they all will be in my watchlist.I think this infobox must become a standart for the RC cardinal's bios.And,about the typos I try to avoid them and I have corrected typos in other's articles,too,but I haven't delete any of them because of typos. Drjmarkov (talk) 10:36, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Armenia
OK, nessun problema. Comunque l'inglese non è la mia lingua madre come assumo non lo sia per te, quindi a volte uso forme che in Italiano vanno bene ma che in Inglese forse sono considerate meno chiare.--Dejudicibus (talk) 12:38, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
... for your excellent contributions. I have been writing many articles on Italian composers of the Renaissance, such as Pietro Taglia just this morning, and I see that the church at which he worked -- Santa Maria presso San Celso -- already has an article thanks to you. This is most wonderful. Please keep up the good work! Antandrus (talk) 19:04, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Notable Citizens
Attilos, I disagree with your assessment that there are no notable citizens of Guardiagrele. If we leave aside the manner in which you summarily excise the contribution made by myself and others on the basis of what can only be subjective criteria - why do you assume that your assessment of who is notable is definitive? Isn't that just a little arrogant? Plus you are little inconsistent. The Italian version of the Guardiagrele entry contains all the 'notable citizens' which you have excised from the English version. Why do you only exercise your blue pencil in the English version? Could it be that you are merely an old tom cat patrolling 'his' territory?

Some comments about my qualifications to write about Guardiagrele. My mother is a Guardiese, I was born in Guardiagrele, My wife is a Guardiese as is my mother-in-law and father-in-law.

Now I could undo your amendment and we could play a silly game of do and undo but I won't do that. But I would like you to give some indication as to why your subjective judgements are to be valued above all others.( But only of course in the English Wiki pages) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guardiese (talk • contribs) 10:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair comment
I accept that as fair comment.It does nothing for Wikipedia to be trivial, I accept that. I will think carefully and replace some of the notable people at least those where there is an entry in Wikipedia, Italian or English. (talk) 12:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC) Guardiese

Re this edit
Congratulations! Cheers, Ian Spackman (talk) 10:11, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Tuff and tufa
Hi. Just a friendly question: Are you sure that when you are changing "tufa" to "tuff" that you know the rock type? Tufa is a kind of limestone; tuff is from volcanic ash. Both can be used as building stones. You may well be correct in most of your changes, but not in the entry for "limestone". Wilson44691 (talk) 16:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Italian municipalities
Hi,

my name is István, I am and editor of the Hungarian wikipedia. I have the following question: under what circumstances (licences) can the coats of arms from www.araldicacivica.it be used? Because I saw on the Italian wikipedia that the majority of them are noted Fair use, but also some of them are noted as Public domain in Wikimedia Commons. I have the permission from the site (www.araldicacivica.it) to use them, but I don't really know if the Italian law permits the free usage of them, and in case they do, under what conditions? Thank you --Albertistvan (talk) 06:08, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Many thanks--Albertistvan (talk) 12:37, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 20:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)
The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:29, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Etruscans taskforce
I'm looking into creating a taskforce to improve the quality of articles relating to the Etruscan civilization. Since I've seen your name in several Etruscan related article histories I thought you might be interested in joining. Best wishes/Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 00:26, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 7th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 15:23, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Giuseppe Firrao jr
I am really sorry to see you again editing my articles. I remember, I asked you not to do it, because you have personal attitude. I will undo your edit in a minute and if you again shorten my article I will report the administrators for violating my work! I am sure, that you really like the articles to be short and neat, but you are not the man, who can choose which facts from a person's biography are important and which of them aren't. Believe me, this time I will search a solution of this problem!Drjmarkov (talk) 22:02, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * When I say "My article" I mean that I have created it. I did not mean possession, but work. You obviously are in a bad mood to catch a single word and speculate with it. You do not need to contact with an administrator, because I did it. I told you, I will search a solution.Drjmarkov (talk) 13:51, 12 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm just looking in on this as a random outsider, but I agree with Drjmarkov. Did you realise you were actually deleting information about this Firrao guy (info on who his parents were, for instance), when your edit comment only mentioned updating the category links? (later edit comments said nothing intelligible!) That's normally considered extremely bad form. If you disagree with any points of fact, then you should challenge them with requests for source citations, rather than just outright remove them. You should, in particular, always give a clear explanation for why you're removing something. Repeated removal of sections of information without any plausible explanation will force other editors into concluding that you're engaging in vandalism, and I would expect some tags to start appearing on your talk page. You seem to have a long edit history — why would you want to tarnish it with vandalism? Fuzzypeg★ 23:00, 14 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you for explaining your actions more clearly on my talk page. So, what you are saying in effect is that you removed that information because you felt it was irrelevant, yet you did not explain the reasons for that removal even after the edit was challenged, and instead merely engaged in what was essentially edit warring, stating to Drjmarkov (amidst abuse) that you had only changed formatting. If you were aware at the time that you were removing information then you were being duplicitous, marking your edit summaries as "cat sharpened" and "sthg", and then claiming at User talk:Drjmarkov that you had only made stylistic edits. If you were unaware that you had been removing information, then that shows extreme sloppiness, and an apology would now be due to Drjmarkov.
 * If anything like this continues, then as I said, other editors will be forced to conclude that this is vandalism. Be more careful with your edits, and tone down your accusations. In short, pull your head in. Fuzzypeg★ 01:19, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Ariccia Materials
I've been making lots of changes in the article on Ariccia (generally without signing in), but I'm not clever enough to know how to footnote references in Wikipedia. If I supplied references to you, could you footnote them?

There's lots of cool stuff about Ariccia that people don't know -- the Diana connection, the role in the Latin League, the town's place on The Grand Tour. There's an important book that has come out in the last year about Diana and Ariccia. I will get it through my university's library.

I'm not a historian, just someone who loves history and Ariccia.

Feel free to contact me at Auburnwine at yahoo.com

Pax, Chuck Hill —Preceding unsigned comment added by Auburnwine (talk • contribs) 17:15, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Bembo_Raphael.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bembo_Raphael.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:02, 15 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. <font color="CEBE70">MECU ≈ talk 13:02, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Cadoneghe-Stemma.gif
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cadoneghe-Stemma.gif, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 23:50, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Calvera-Stemma.gif
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Calvera-Stemma.gif, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 00:34, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Cancellara-Stemma.gif
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cancellara-Stemma.gif, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 03:05, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Cassina_de_Pecchi-Stemma.png
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cassina_de_Pecchi-Stemma.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 16:41, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 14th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:13, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Niccolò Ridolfi
Within the recent days raised a conflict between You - a very experienced editor and me - not so skilled but but with very special interests of the Catholic Hierarchy. For my great disappointment this conflict had to be settled by other editors. To argue was not my main purpose to write in Wikipedia and I always preferred to respect the other users. In this context it appears that I must ask you to look back to the article Niccolò Ridolfi, that you have created more than a year before. I think it is too short and cites no sources. Secondly, I think that you should move the article to a title that does not include non-English letters (ò). Instead of placing template messages at the top op the article, I decided to write to you. I inform you, that after 24 hrs I will start the editing process.
 * First of all I am really sorry, that my personal letter is misunderstood again. About the redirect pages and everything connected with the transliteration of the names I am aware of. I just suggested it without any menace and about the names in Wikipedia worldwide there are many examples, when there are titles with diacriticals, and many without them. The moving of a page is always not an easy decision, because all the pages, linking to the moved one have to be corrected. As I have always said, I prefer the descent tone between the users and the reason I came upon exactly that page is that Niccolò Ridolfi is the next cardinal deacon of Ss Vito et Modesto church. I search information for the cardinals sorted by their titular church and from the past to the present times chronologically. So I had no personal intention finding this page at all. I was afraid, that you would decide, that I search your contributions to criticize them. I would never do such thing. So I asked you to try to correct the information, because you have created the article. About the missing sources, I am sure that this is just a mistake, but because I don't know them, I am just asking you to add them. I can't understand, why are you making big problems any time,when someone criticize you. With all the respect I have because of your experience, I have created or edited not more than 600 - 700 articles and you are the only user that every time reminds me about the Five Pillars of Wikipedia. I read usually a lot and very carefully and I have read them of course. Even though I think, that when I am going to edit something it is always better to inform its author and to allow him or her to do it personally. And because of that principle of mine I wrote the previous letter to you with clear awareness of your consequent answer, so I gave you this short term - 24 hours not as a menace, but for saving time. When I come upon a user, who is not so frequently online in Wikipedia, I usually wait more. With this long letter I tried to explain why I am doing this edit, nevertheless in those Five Pillars it is not said, that one user have to write a page-long explanation for adding a few dates and correcting some facts(for example this cardinal had been archbishop only of Florence and just administrator of the other sees). He had participated in two more conclaves and had a very "stormy life" from the early fame to the captivity and than back to the top. That is why I say that the article is short.

Peace: DrjmarkovDrjmarkov (talk) 12:46, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Luca Pacioli
In Luca Pacioli, why did you change to reflist? Finell (Talk) 06:34, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Albano_Laziale-Stemma.png
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Albano_Laziale-Stemma.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 01:29, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Alcamo-Stemma.png
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Alcamo-Stemma.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 02:22, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Alof_Louvre.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Alof_Louvre.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 05:26, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Altoviti.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Altoviti.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:56, 22 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 05:56, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Altoviti.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Altoviti.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 12:28, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Aosta-Stemma.png
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Aosta-Stemma.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 13:21, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Aquileia-Stemma.png
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Aquileia-Stemma.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 13:37, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Atella-Stemma.gif
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Atella-Stemma.gif, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 15:17, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Aversa-Stemma.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Aversa-Stemma.gif, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 16:01, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Bella-Stemma.gif
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bella-Stemma.gif, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 02:36, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Biglietto_band.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Biglietto_band.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 04:12, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Birolli_59.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Birolli_59.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:59, 23 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Kelly hi! 04:59, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Claudia Koll 0075.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Claudia Koll 0075.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:24, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

RE:Compliments!
Thank you for the compliments! :) Comunque ogni tanto, se puoi, dai un'occhio ai miei edits, e apporta tutte le modifiche che ritieni necessarie (a volte non sono sicurissimo di scrivere correttamente e mi sembra che tendo ad esagerare un po' nelle spiegazioni) ;) Ciao! -PanozzoFetuso (talk) 13:21, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:14, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:FNM.gif missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:FNM.gif is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:51, 29 April 2008 (UTC) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:51, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Birthplace
Hello Attilios, no offense but the WP:Manual of Style does not say anything about the place of birth, only on the date of birth. Even if it was in there, I think it would be a silly rule and silly rules should not be obeyed. Date and place of birth and death should be in the first sentence so readers have that information in one glance. Be bold, as the general rule of WP says. I have been in this debate before, but I really cannot imagine why date and place should not be together. So, if you don't mind I would like to put it back. Kind regards. - Mafia Expert (talk) 14:49, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I still think it is a silly rule, but it is not that important. Have it your way, or WP, whatever. - Mafia Expert (talk) 19:03, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sorcerer Friedkin.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Sorcerer Friedkin.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:13, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Venosa
Ciao Attilios, sono italiano come te quindi possiamo parlare tranquillamente nella nostra madrelingua. Ho appena inserito delle foto nella voce di Venosa, potresti dare un'occhiata se sono corrette le loro didascalie. Un grazie anticipato! Puoi contattarmi nella wiki italiana, sono Generale Lee —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.6.35.193 (talk) 13:13, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)
The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:59, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:12, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:15, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Bonvi2 video.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bonvi2 video.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

The following images also have this problem:


 * Image:Cattivik Bonvi.gif

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --21:43, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Anita Caprioli in Santa Maradona.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Anita Caprioli in Santa Maradona.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:32, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Corsano-Stemma.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Corsano-Stemma.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:26, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi Attlios!
Congratualtions, on your graduation, and your job! I hope you will not be too busy to keep in touch! I am doing a lot of painting- I did a portrait of my son in his big Aussie hat, in Monet's garden, with a dreamy expression on his face. I'm quite pleased with the way it worked out.

As for the cathedrals- I might work through them in alphabetical order. On the other hand, may I will work through them in order of personal preference. Maybe I ought to check out which ones have the worst wiki pages and do those first.

I'm also thinking about writing an article similar to the one that I have already written, that deals with all the more modern cathedrals, beginnning with St Paul's which is late 17th century- Liverpool, Truro, Coventry, Westminster, Birmingham, St Chad's, and so on...

Well, I'd better check out my watchlist. The constant vandalism is such a bore! love, Amandajm (talk) 12:50, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

User:Stephen_Ewen
You might be interested in the talkpage for User talk:Tiptoety. Best to youDie4Dixie (talk) 20:28, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:02, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)
The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:34, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Redirect of Monti Pisani
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Monti Pisani, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Monti Pisani is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Monti Pisani, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:33, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Parco_Vigeland_-_Padre_e_figlio.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Parco_Vigeland_-_Padre_e_figlio.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Rettetast (talk) 22:02, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Parco_Vigeland_obelisco_vista_d'insieme.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Parco_Vigeland_obelisco_vista_d'insieme.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Rettetast (talk) 22:02, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:24, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 9, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:17, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Maltese language
Hey there! Just noticed some of the edits you made to the Maltese language article; thanks. There's plenty of work to be done and not many people willing/able to put the effort in! golden bells, pomegranates, prunes &amp; prisms (talk) 22:28, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 23 and 26, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:49, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 23 and 26, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:50, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Replacement of HTML with TEX
You have recently introduced lexing errors into Centripetal force while editing to change HTML into TEX, in particular by failure to replace θ and Ω with $$\theta$$ and $$\Omega$$. Aside from taking the time to check that your changes are producing readable results, it occurs to me that you might read Pros of HTML. In general, HTML in the body of text is preferable from an appearance standpoint, in my experience, making such changes to TEX inadvisable, even when done carefully. Brews ohare (talk) 22:45, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 30, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:46, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)
The June 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:32, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Your editing
Instead of editing perfectly fine articles why don't you edit the embarrassing grammatical and spelling mess you left when you created the article Carmine Alfieri? That article is a bloody shame on Wikipedia. And while you are at it, provide references as well. - Mafia Expert (talk) 13:20, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Sthg?
Could you please use a more informative edit summary? This is as useless as none at all.

Also, edits such as this one lose information – in this case, you deleted the book series the work is part of and thus damaged the reference. Please take more care over things like this. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 10:42, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Church of the Eremitani
Hi. Hope you are well. Could you expand this? ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦      $1,000,000? 11:00, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Disruptive changes
Hi Attilios, please check this 2 disruptive changes and, probably made by an Anti-italian user. This User is probably a User:No.13 sockpuppet, already a sockpuppet of User:Afrika paprika. Check user? --Nickel Chromo (talk) 08:58, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 7, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:05, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Argyrosomus
Hi, I see that you created the page about Argyrosomus_Regius. Currently being in Australia, I've got first hand information about Argyrosomus_Japonicus (Mulloway). I'd like to have some help & information on how to create a page about it, or where to add information. This would be the first time I'd do this. Thanks. Scyrma (talk) 12:55, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Captain General of the Church
You'll either love or hate my newest list. You'll notice that it links to at least one of your creations. Savidan 04:28, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I took care of Pedro Luis de Borja Lanzol de Romaní because I like the image and he intersected with my cardinal-nephew interest. Cheers, Savidan 01:34, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Matia Bazar
Hi could you expand this? ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦      $1,000,000? 18:22, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Better source request for Image:Bellini_Transfiguration.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bellini_Transfiguration.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? OsamaK 19:06, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Mappaita1030.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:Mappaita1030.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sdrtirs (talk) 23:28, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Respect Thread Conversions
I'm looking for folks to help convert Respect Threads to wiki formatting on Project Fanboy: WikiFans. Respect Threads, showcase scans of feats performed by comic book characters and have gained an audience on several comic book message boards. A few other wiki editors and myself are trying to convert them from the unprofessional look of a bunch of posts on a message board to the formatting common with WikiMedia wiki's. To view an example of what we're doing, here is a link to Respect Silver Surfer.

I was wondering if you might have time to contribute your comic book knowledge and/or scans of comic book characters performing feats, and help us out with our Respect Articles project?Millennium Cowboy (talk) 02:10, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 14 and 21, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:58, 27 July 2008 (UTC)