User talk:Atulbahl1986

Welcome!
Hello, Atulbahl1986, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Atul bahl, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dom from Paris (talk) 10:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Atul bahl


A tag has been placed on Atul bahl, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dom from Paris (talk) 10:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself, at Atul bahl. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Dom from Paris (talk) 10:48, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 12:32, 17 August 2019 (UTC)


 * If you mean this please keep WP:BE in mind. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 09:53, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I have reverted those edits as the block is for you as a person and not just your user account. I will assume you didn't know that you were not allowed to do this or you wouldn't have so openly told us what you did. --Dom from Paris (talk) 12:46, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Atulbahl1986, are you explicitly rejecting the path toward unblocking that I offered you? On August 25th, you indicated that path was complicated and confusing, indicating that we shouldn't unblock you as you lack sufficient competence to be unblocked. But you didn't come right out and state this. Are you rejecting that path toward unblocking? --Yamla (talk) 13:13, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi Yamla, I think you're getting me wrong here. But yes I did find the set of instructions a bit complicated as I am currently extremely occupied with work as I'm sure all of you are or have been as well and I'd rather not go through with something I'm not confident about to further annoy you or any other admin. So I'm not rejecting your advice/instructions that's why I tried to edit an article when I was logged out. However, I chose a simpler path that would save a little time which was clearly not allowed and reversed. All I'm asking you guys is to go a little easy on me. As even though I've made mistakes I have nothing but respect for this forum and its adminsAtulbahl1986 (talk) 14:39, 26 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is not a forum. Pinging . There was no ping in comment above mine. — usernamekiran (talk)  22:32, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Leaving aside your continued block evasion, your edits to Pernia Qureshi were totally insufficient and generally made the article worse. Combined with your inability to follow the instructions above, I oppose lifting the block. --Yamla (talk) 22:44, 26 August 2019 (UTC)