User talk:Atwozee

Notability of Ghulam Mohiuddin Thathaal
A tag has been placed on Ghulam Mohiuddin Thathaal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:46, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Choudhry Ghulam Mohiuddin Thathaal
A tag has been placed on Choudhry Ghulam Mohiuddin Thathaal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Beeblbrox (talk) 21:31, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

January 2010
Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. - Spaceman  Spiff  20:04, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Adil Thathaal.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Adil Thathaal.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 23:25, 17 January 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 23:25, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Barrister Sultan Mahmood Chaudhry.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Barrister Sultan Mahmood Chaudhry.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)(Talk) 23:26, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Prominent Thathaals
Stop adding names for which no article exists. If they are notable you need to write their article first. Failure to do so constitutes a violation of the Reliable sources policy. 98.248.41.72 (talk) 19:16, 22 January 2010 (UTC) I have added so many references regarding Adil Thathaal and Deepika thathaal but admin deleted that prominent people from the list this is not fair, no body on this planet except thathaals use the word Thathaal with his or her name and some times they use Choudhry or Chaudhry in last of name in starting of name. please dont annoy thathaals and Jogibaba wants to delete this page from wikipedia so block this kind of users on this page, he is mother sucker and even do not know about his real father name, the name mentioned on his birth certificate have no proof, kindly ask from his mother.

File copyright problem with File:Khambi1.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Khambi1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:09, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Khambi2.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Khambi2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:09, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Thathaal
Hi Atwozee, I saw you have added " deepika Thathaal and her brother in the list of "Prominent Thathaals". I have deleted those because according to their father, he is Thothal and not Thathaal and not jatt but Rajput, moreover they are Half durrani and half thothal Rajput. One thing you mentioned that adil was born in pakistan was not right either, he was born in norway. I got these information from his father because i have to meet him to give me a phot of adil for upload in wikipedia.

I would like to invite you to the "discussion" area of the article rather than adding people while the authenticity of the article is questionable. I beleive wikipedia is a knowledge we have to transfer to the coming generations, it shouldn't be used to glorify some individual or group of individuals. I hope you would like to contribute in the discussion to bring the truth forward. RegardsJogibaba (talk) 19:22, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Hello Atwozee, I have undone your reversion to the article in question. It is clear that the article's factual accuracy is disputed, so please discuss the changes on the article's discussion page instead of reverting. Also, all contentious information about living people, such as belonging to a certain group needs to be sourced, per our biographies of living persons policy. Further edit warring may lead to your editing privileges being revoked. Thanks,  (talk) 10:37, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Thathaal. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (talk) 08:38, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive editing, continuous BLP violations desptite multiple warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  04:53, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:17, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for repeated BLP vios in terms of adding unsourced BLP entries to caste list despite prior warnings and block. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  10:05, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Close paraphrasing
Hi. I'm afraid the Sheraz Uppal article you wrote contained copyright infringement (now removed) of, since the text is too closely paraphrased. While facts are not copyrightable, creative elements of presentation - including both structure and language - are. For an example of close paraphrasing, consider the following:

The source says:

So that it will not constitute a derivative work, content we import needs to be completley rewritten in our words, except that we may use brief clearly marked quotations in accordance with WP:NFC. The essay Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism".

Alternatively, if material can be verified to be public domain or permission is provided, we can use the original text with proper attribution, as set out at Plagiarism

Please let me know if you have questions about this. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:50, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Thathal listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Thathal. Since you had some involvement with the Thathal redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Sitush (talk) 04:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Thathal for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thathal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Thathal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 22:42, 7 February 2018 (UTC)