User talk:Auberginia

Welcome!
Hello, Auberginia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 12:03, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
I've once again removed the unsupported claim made in Fenn treasure that you reinstated. Our WP:BLP policy requires that I also opened a section on the talk page to discuss my initial removal of the material, which you have failed to engage in.

If you persist in inserting unsourced controversial material into the article, I shall not hesitate to ask at WP:ANI for sanctions to prevent further repetition on your part. I should point out that the material also fall foul of our policies on original research and synthesis by attempting to combine two disparate sources to produce a conclusion not stated in any source. --RexxS (talk) 16:38, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Fenn treasure shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. –dlthewave ☎ 20:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

D/S Alert
–dlthewave ☎ 20:14, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Biographies of living persons policy
I noticed you justify your attempts to shoehorn in negative material in Fenn treasure with the edit summary "This is not a biography page. Stop removing cited info or you will be reported". It doesn't make any difference what kind of page it is. I quote from the Biographies of living persons policy: "Editors must take particular care when adding information about living persons to any Wikipedia page" (bold and italics in the original), "This policy applies to any living person mentioned in a BLP, whether or not that person is the subject of the article, and to material about living persons in other articles and on other pages, including talk pages". If you continue to edit war you will be blocked. I suggest you engage on the article talkpage instead. And go ahead and report if you like. Bishonen &#124; talk 20:33, 11 February 2020 (UTC).