User talk:Aubreygrossman

2006 comment
This is not disrupting Wikipedia when illustrating a point on Dave Grossman. It is important to note that a lot of statements Grossman makes, such as firing rates during the Civil War, are from a third party, obviously since the war occured over 200 years ago, and I don't believe Grossman is over 200 years old. It is important to list who exactly this third party is and their credibility on the topic, which helps to see if Grossman is credible on this topic as well.

And I don't appreciate the "Changed the entry back to its original form after Gamer81 changed it again (while trying to hide his identity by not logging in).)" that you left for me on my user talk page. I had two windows open when updating, and logged out of one, and for some reason when I edited the Grossman page, I was apparently logged off of that one.  Rather than removing the entry, logging back in, and reposting it, I left it as is.  What would be so special about Dave Grossman that I would want to try and hide my identity? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gamer81 (talk • contribs) 17:34, October 15, 2006

Please note
Please see my comment on Talk:Dave Grossman (author). Thank you. YechielMan 14:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Barnacles
I'm sorry, but I did some research and I couldn't find anything that indicated that the phrase has spread anywhere beyond Dave and people who know Dave personally; as such, I have deleted it as a neologism.

If it's that good, it'll spread and then it'll get an article again. DS 14:57, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Declaring COI (w/ split infinitive)
Your edits have, indeed, been helpful. Still, WP:COI is worthwhile. Thank you. --S. Rich (talk) 15:53, 13 April 2011 (UTC)