User talk:Auchrins

Image copyright problem with File:Racicot31.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Racicot31.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 08:50, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Copyright violation in Dave Racicot
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Dave Racicot, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Dave Racicot is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Dave Racicot, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 09:21, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Mobil Travel Guide category
I was wondering if you wouldn't mind commenting at this discussion and explaining the rational behind why you created this category. I'm not entirely sure that it is without the scope of categorization, and at the very least the name should be altered to be more clear. This discussion could lead to the category being deleted, so your input would be appreciated. Thanks.-Andrew c [talk] 19:46, 7 February 2009 (UTC)