User talk:Audialterampartem

Why are you deleting a referenced edit to Mary Wooldridge? This is about the only item in the article that does not rely on her pr material. That it might not be political comfortable for her is neither here or there. --Michael Johnson 10:17, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Why am I editing???
If this was truly neccessary to include, then surely it should appear on the Minchin's own wikipedia entry, unless... you are trying to personally attack a candidate in an election. It is also worth pointing out, to ensure that you are fully appraised of the situation, Wooldridge was taking part in an exercise on behalf of the minister she was employed by, and that the issue was later dropped.


 * The SMH article relates to Wooldridge. If you want to put a sorrced reference to the issue being dropped go ahead. Don't remove valid sourced parts of articles. And no I'm not trying to attack Wooldridge, just trying to introduce some depth into what is otherwise a bland cv mostly taken from her own PR material. You are unfortunately demonstrating POV - an editor who's first edit is to try and whitewash one political candidate, then attacks her opposition three or four edits later. Try not to introduce your POV into edits. --Michael Johnson 10:32, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Last edit
Just letting you know I thought your last edit to Mary Wooldridge was fair and reasonable. Hope you continue editing Wikipedia. --Michael Johnson 10:54, 26 October 2006 (UTC)