User talk:Audiovocal

Proposed deletion of Sevana
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sevana, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Does not meet inclusion guidelines; merely applying for or receiving two patents is not enough to establish notability per WP:CORP.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. §FreeRangeFrog 17:43, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Regarding the message you left on my talk page, please read the guideline I mention above. A company must be notable somehow in order to have an entry in the encyclopedia, and your article did not provide reliable (see WP:RS) third-party sources that could potentially document that. Per the guideline, the two patents are not enough. §FreeRangeFrog 18:29, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Sevana
An article that you have been involved in editing, Sevana, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Sevana. Thank you.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 18:11, 16 February 2009 (UTC)