User talk:AudreyAvonley

Gerald Vernon-Jackson Article
Hello, I'm Nightenbelle. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nightenbelle (talk) 22:20, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Portsmouth 2019 article
Hello, I'm Jonjonjohny. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2019 Portsmouth City Council election have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Jonjonjohny (talk) 05:58, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Pompy election article
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2019 Portsmouth City Council election. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. What I added to the article is sourced and relevant. You have decided to omit specific information. Regardless of how small the page or it's content is, that is not within the ethos of Wikipedia Jonjonjohny (talk) 06:32, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

You've been reported for edit warring
Please see Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. You can respond at the noticeboard if you wish, to defend your changes. The page in dispute is 2019 Portsmouth City Council election. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 12:12, 24 May 2019 (UTC)

Why do you keep removing cited additional information to Stephen Morgan MP? Marcuscribb89 (talk) 20:03, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 11:13, 25 May 2019 (UTC)