User talk:Augest

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! &mdash; Instantnood 21:02, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

HKWNB, HKCOTW, Current events
Hello Augest. Thanks for your contributions to the Leslie Cheung article. You might be interested to take a look at HK wikipedians' notice board, HK Collaboration of the Week and Current events in Hong Kong and Macao. Happy editing! &mdash; Instantnood 21:02, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Images of Leslie Cheung
You have uploaded images of Leslie Cheung that may or may not be legal as their copyright status is in question. Most of the images, except for the CD album cannot be used as fair use images as their copyright belongs to the original news agency or photographer. Please update the copyright status for the images, justify why they constitute fair use or remove them altogether. Thanks. --speedoflight 03:33, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

Hi, I have left you messages here and on the Leslie Cheung page concerning the copyright for the images. I haven't heard back. Please reply. Thanks. --speedoflight | talk to me 06:08, 5 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your latest reply back. And also thanks for working on this article. Some suggestions I do have for improving this article is to cite it to reliable sources (substantial publication/editors/date), i.e. create footnotes, reference links, etc.


 * Your image of his funeral hearse was most likely not photographed by the Leslie Club that you sourced it to. If you should claim fair use, you should at least source it to the right photographer, news agency, etc. --speedoflight | talk to me 09:55, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Cheung's Suicide Note
The actual suicide note in Chinese should be posted and its English translation listed alongside. As with any translation, it's always better to have the original listed so that those who can read the language, can appreciate its original intent.

BTW, you're doing a great job with the article. The only thing lacking are citations to notable publications. Citations are very important to verify that the reported information is factual versus subjective hearsay, gossip, etc. --speedoflight | talk to me 00:55, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Grammatical Errors in Leslie Cheung Article
Please ensure that your edits do not have grammatical errors. You keep reverting back to editions of the page that are filled with grammatical errors. --speedoflight | talk to me 07:48, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

you wrote: Please don't remove background or useful information when you do "gramma" corrections. --Augest 05:55, 14 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Your "facts" are written as points of views. I have requested many times that you cite sources with footnotes or reference notes. If you are unsure of how to do this, please refer to Wikipedia's citation policies. During a copy edit, if information is found redundant or insufficiently cited, it needs to be removed.


 * Please review: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Cite_sources

--speedoflight | talk to me 09:21, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Edits
you wrote: I keep telling you to be patient as I am still in my process to finger out a better way to put references and resources staff. However, you keep removing things in all kinds of excuses, introducing tons of mistakes, and making the article ambiguous. If you want to put whatever references you want, go ahead and do it. Or if anything you consider as needed a reference, EXPLICITLY POINTED OUT. Don't just rudely remove things with ridiculous reasons. Not "EVERY" piece of sentence needs a reference, otherwise ALL articles in wiki should be removed. I spent THREE months to verify the information, correct errors and finish the current article. To dig out all the original resources may need another 3 months. I also need break during the Christmas season. Please be patient!!! --Augest 18:21, 14 December 2005 (UTC)


 * If you cannot verify something yet or don't have the time to cite something, then don't put it up on Wikipedia yet. Articles on Wikipedia are syndicated to many sites and once content is syndicated, it is sometimes not updated. Hence, information that is erroneous, including poor grammar is populated across. I have removed information that you have not cited or verifed. You write in content that contain POV that is either yours or some other sources. By Wikipedia standards, these need to be remove. I realize you have emotional attachment to your content. As a writer/contributor, the first rule of thumb is to isolate your emotions away from your content and write in a neutral tone and CITE, CITE, CITE. If you cannot verify statistics, data and CITE them on the page, then it needs to be removed, period. Wikipedia or any source that is reputable is based on written communication. In other words, if you cannot write down your information source when you research, then it is either considered plagiarism or unverifiable. --speedoflight | talk to me 19:42, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Do NOT remove tags on the page
Please do not remove the tags concerning the article's health. The article is poorly written. Needs major copy edit, citations. All of these issues are documented on the article's discussion page. You insist on reverting back to editions that have poor edits. I am not sure what your motivations are. We are all writing for the benefit of Wikipedia. Any article on Wikipedia, no matter if the subject is something dear to you or not needs to conform to standards. Wikipedia is not a tabloid magazine. It's a resource site and has a reputation to uphold. I am not going to indulge you in some trivial edit war. You are obviously someone who cares about the subject and may even be a huge fan of Cheung's and being so, do what is best for the article, not for your ego. A write needs to learn to not fall in love with his/her words. The article does not belong to you or I. It belongs to the community called Wikipedia. So please think long and hard about where your interests are. Wikipedia is not your private Web site to write and put whatever you wish. There are standards that must be upheld so that Wikipedia can be used as a resource site for everyone. You could learn a lot from in writing from reputable sources and cleaning up your grammar on the page. If you do not know how to do so, let others do it. --speedoflight | talk to me 03:52, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

cleanup tag
Please explain your cleanup tag on Orientalism. And no, it is not a prerequisite for writing on this topic that one should have read the book, since the topic is not about the Said book, but about the concept and the tradition. However, if you have any objections to the way the book is characterised in the subsection devoted to it, please indicate them. Otherwise the cleanup tag is rather difficult to make sense of and I will remove it. Paul B 09:30, 30 July 2005 (UTC)

I did not write the section on the book, but I have certainly read the book. I added the section on criticisms of the book. The book-summary section seems to me to give a broadly accurate account of Said's arguments. Saying something is "woefully inadequate" without indicating how, is itself woefully inadequate. You still remain mysteriously quiet about just what it is that is wrong with the summary. The tenor of your comments suggest that you believe Said's book to be authoritative in some way, but seem unable or unwilling to suggest just how it has been misrepresented. I suggest you read some of the reviews written at the time, or more recent commentaries on Said's model of "orientalism" [1]. Paul B 09:23, 31 July 2005 (UTC) Well I haven't practiced my swinging, so I'll have to pass on the contest. But I still think you miss the central point. The article is not about the book. The book is a particular intervention in the tradition, one that is clearly important enough to single out, but not to be treated as "gospel" in any sense. Perhaps more on Said's arguments would be desirable. Perhaps more on Lewis's criticisms would be more pertinent. Perhaps we could have more on the art, or more on the details of western scholarly commentary on eastern cultures, or more on eastern views on the west. Perhaps and perhaps. I can only assume that the real reason for singling out the book called "Orientalism" is an assumption that this particular book is central to what the article should be about, partly because the names are the same. And that's essentially my problem with the cleanup notice. Paul B 21:40, 1 Aug 2005 (UTC) Please - I do not think you have earned the right to tell me what is "not a very good attitude to have on Wikipedia". I have as much right "unilaterally" to remove the tag as you did to add it. I was behaving no more unilaterally than you were. There was no sign whatever of a wider "community" who agreed with you. I removed the tag for the following reasons:

1. A cleanup tag is inappropriate. It is mainly used for articles that are badly written or otherwise chaotic. I don't think even you thought that this was the case. 2. A cleanup tag refers the reader to the talk page for the reasons why a cleanup tag has been added. You added nothing to talk page to explain the tag. Is this "a very good attitude to have on Wikipedia"? 3. Unnecessary cleanup tags make Wikipedia look bad. They give the impression that the articles are poor and unprofessional. They should only be there when an article really does need to be cleaned up - in order to show that Wikipedians are aware of inadequacies. 4. When I asked you why you had added it I got no clear explanation. You could tell me nothing that was actually wrong with the article, and resorted to the, in my view bizarre, argument that you believed that if someone read Said's book "more closely" then they would come up with a different reading of it than the authors of the article. Now, either you have read it closely and can say what is wrong with the account or you have not. You cannot reasonably claim that some other mystery person will, if they read it, come up with an argument that agrees with your inexpressible intuitions.

I think a request for section-expansion would have been far more appropriate than a cleanup tag. However, what I am going to do is put in a Peer Review request, that is a request for Wikpedians to suggest improvements. Paul B 15:22 24 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Linkspro, your language is wholly inappropriate. It is clear that you are resorting to the last refuge of insult. I have explained my thinking on the subject as clearly as I can and I have taken appropriate action by requesting Peer review. Here's a link to the relevant page [2]. I note that the only content-related addition so far has been to emphasise criticism of Said's text. Perhaps other editors will respond differently. Paul B 23:55 24 Aug 2005 (UTC) Since your language is becoming increasingly childish, I see no advantage in further discussion with you. Your arguments were not remotely "exact", they were nowhere to be seen. You were uncompromising only in the sense that you you folded your arms and refured to budge. If you think that stubbornness is the same as integrity that I suspect you are mistaken. If I am "delusional" then I suppose User:TheoClarke and User:Pmanderson must be too. In your first reply to my query you wrote "I think most everyone who has read the book would agree with this judgement." I've provided you will links to reviews to indicate otherwise. The above users evidently think otherwise. You have provided no argument at all that is not vague and unspecific. Paul B 10:13 25 Aug 2005 (UTC)

peer review
Nomination procedure

Anyone can request peer review here. When posting your request, include a brief description of the kind of comments/contributions you want, and sections of the article you think need to be reviewed. The best way to get lots of reviews is to reply promptly and appreciatively on this page to the comments you do get.

* Procedure for adding nominations:

1. Place peerreview at the top of the article's talk page (not the article itself) to let other editors of the article know that the article is being peer reviewed. 2. From there, click on the link request has been made that appears in the new "peer review" box. This will open a page to discuss the review of your article. 3. Place ===name of nominated article=== at the top (do not forget the link brackets). 4. Below it, write your reason for nominating the article and sign by using four tildes (Augest 02:30, 19 March 2006 (UTC)). 5. Place at the top of the list of nominees found on this page (Requests). 6. Politely request feedback on the discussion pages of one or more articles in the same or a related field, and/or send messages to one or more individual Wikipedians who have contributed to the same or a closely related field.

Establishment of The Wikimedia Hong Kong
encyclopedist 17:04, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Phantom Lover
Hi, an image you recently uploaded, Image:Phantom.jpg replaced another image that was used on the The Phantom of the Opera (1986 musical) page, which was causing problems. I have reverted your upload, and I'm afraid you'll have to reupload the 夜半歌聲 poster again using a different file name. Thank you! _dk 00:03, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Vivaerotica.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Vivaerotica.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 19:09, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nomad film.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nomad film.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:27, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nomad inSea.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nomad inSea.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:29, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nomad2.jpeg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nomad2.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:31, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:One-child.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:One-child.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Farewell1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Farewell1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:00, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Daysofbeingwild cheung.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Daysofbeingwild cheung.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:16, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Leslie Cheung edits
Okay. Is it possible to find a citation that allows for an estimation of the crowd size? He was fabulously popular in China, and it might be more appropriate to reference how many folk mourned his death. - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  03:07, 1 May 2008 (UTC)


 * There are a lot of Hong Kong newspapers reported on that during the time. I remember the estimation is about 40,000 or so. That's about the crowd on site. The ppl mourned on his death but not be on site could not be counted. But it is reported the yahoo search rate for "Leslie Cheung" set a record that day.
 * If you know Chinese, you can check the HK newspaper during the time to verify. --Augest (talk) 03:22, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, I do not know Chinese (either Mandarin, Cantonese or Shanghainese), and am unable to verify. As you seemed to speak authoritatively as to how many were in attendance (and if you didn't you should not have reverted my edit),I presumed that you do know Chinese.
 * It is best to avoid Google searches as an indication, as they cannot be cited reliably. It is better to find news accounts for the number of people mourning not just in HK but at gatherings throughout China in the najor metropolitan areas. I know that Shanghai, for instance, saw over 200,000 people gather to mourn his suicide. If you have citations, pkease add them. :) - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  03:41, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

I understand you. Millions is definitely right if you count the mourn activity world wide. But please pay attention to the article/context. Here we are talking of the ppl ON SITE in Cheung's ceremony in HONG KONG. Plus, your edit revert my original edit. Do you have any reference? I read newspaper myself and was following up the whole thing back in 2004 --Augest (talk) 03:52, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Ok. I add the reference. --Augest (talk) 04:06, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LeslieCheung01.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:LeslieCheung01.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by an adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jackaranga (talk) 21:34, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LeslieCheung01.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:LeslieCheung01.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by an adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jackaranga (talk) 23:18, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

First Anniversary Celebrations of Wikimedia Hong Kong
Invitied by Sith lord darth vader (talk), 15:31, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Celebrations for 2nd Anniversary of Wikimedia Hong Kong


Dear:  ：

Wikimedia Hong Kong has been founded two year ago. Today, we would like to invite you to a great event for our second anniversary celebrations, that is co-host by us - Digital Content Jam 1.0, which is belongs to The 3C Digital Creativity Dialogue Series -- Creativity, Content, Community.



This is the information of the event：


 * Date: 31, July, 2009 (Friday) 
 * Time: From 7:00pm to 9:30pm 
 * Venue: eTech Centre Meeting Room M2 &3, 4/F Opulent Building, 402-406 Hennessy Road, Wan Chai（Google map） 
 * '''Language: Cantonese
 * Free snacks and drinks will be served!

'''Please register via the link below to tell us if you would like to join the event. Registration Form'''

Regards, Hong Kong Wikimedian Tango Chan 13:36, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nomad2.jpeg
 Thanks for uploading File:Nomad2.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:49, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Cover3 Cheung.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cover3 Cheung.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 17:21, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Final Cheung.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Final Cheung.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 17:21, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Daysofbeingwild cheung.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Daysofbeingwild cheung.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 17:22, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Red Cheung.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Red Cheung.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 17:22, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Passion tour.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Passion tour.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 17:22, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Funeral cheung.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Funeral cheung.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 17:23, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Hong Kong meetup 58
SusanLai (talk) 00:23, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Farewell1.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Farewell1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:22, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:LeslieCheung01.JPG)
Thanks for uploading File:LeslieCheung01.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Hong Kong meetup 83
SusanLai (talk) 09:44, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Hong Kong meetup 84
SusanLai (talk) 06:46, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Hong Kong meetup 86
SusanLai (talk) 06:26, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Hong Kong meetup 87
SusanLai (talk) 04:49, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Hong Kong meetup 87
SusanLai (talk) 04:55, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Hong Kong meetup 89
SusanLai (talk) 01:39, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Hong Kong meetup 90
SusanLai (talk) 02:03, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Hong Kong meetup 90
SusanLai (talk) 04:17, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Augest
User:Augest, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Augest and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Augest during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 05:11, 26 November 2014 (UTC)