User talk:Augraff

help me

This article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Quebec_sentiment) is biased and in my opinion, does not adequately examine the history of discrimination of Francophone Canadians by the Canadian Anglophone population in the early 20th century.

The "Themes" section reads as follows:

--- Themes

Francophones have been criticized by their Anglophone counterparts who feel discriminated against because the law requires French as the only working-language (in large companies, since 1977). The expression pure laine ("pure wool"), used to denote Quebecers of French descent, has often been cited as a manifestation of discriminatory attitudes.[5] Pure laine has been portrayed as an expression of racial exclusion in Quebec, while counter-critics deem the term obsolete.[6][7]

Critics note the low percentage of minority participation in any level of the Quebec public services.[8] While some efforts have been made to increase the percentage of minorities (i.e. Montreal Police Force), the public service of Quebec (Société de l'assurance automobile du Québec, MSSS, etc.) is largely European-Canadian and francophone.[9]

---

The entire setting of the article reads like a series of talking points on which people most commonly bash Bash Quebec.

Particularly gratuitious is the following sentence:

"Some writers have described members of this elite as criminals[10] and compared them to people such as Pol Pot[11] or the Devil.[12][13] The administration of the Government of Quebec has been described as corrupt, sometimes with the derogatory term of "banana republic".[14]"

This sentence is not qualified in any way! Sure, people may have said it, but is it Wikipedia's policy to allow for sentences like this to go unchallenged and simply trumpet slander without a balanced explanation of the issue?

How do I flag articles for this type of one-sidedness and clear bias?

Augraff (talk) 02:30, 23 December 2019 (UTC)Augraff