User talk:Augustogonzalezmor

El Líbero edit warring
Hello, you recently undid a revert I made to your edits on the El Líbero page. This is not acceptable. I realize that you are new on this platform, so please consider this a warning. If you disagree with another editor undoing your work, you must discuss it on the talk page, not revert, as this leads to edit warring. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 02:25, 25 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello Revirvlkodlaku. I live in Chile, Im a journalist and I have worked in multiple media outlets. All the information I put about El Líbero is true and was backed up with links from various reliable sources. Despite that, you decided to delete all my work with weak excuses. Do you know the importance in Chile of the National Press Association? You say there were weak references, to Twitter, for example. But that link you're referring led to the profile of a Pullitzer Prize winner. Does that seem like a weak reference to you? Instead, in your edition you leave references to fourth category leaflets that have no credibility in my country.
 * Much of the material you left behind is downright biased and contains flippant quotes. Also, you have incorrect information. For example, Patricio Navia is the main columnist for El Líbero and has written more than 800 articles for the newspaper. But you decide to delete it and leave other names of people who are not regular collaborators.
 * Im new in Wikipedia, Im interested in continuing to collaborate in editing articles related to my country and I apologize if I broke any code on this site. But you erased all my work! Augustogonzalezmor (talk) 00:50, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, apologies for undoing your work; please know that it isn't personal. The reason I did so was that some of the references you added, including the one from Twitter, are not considered reliable, as I mentioned in my revert summary. It is likely that what you are saying is true, and I certainly don't know anything about the Chilean National Press Association, but that really isn't the point here. The point is that if you use unreliable sources to support your edits, your entire effort appears dubious to other editors. If you are able to support your edits with credible sources, please do so, and I will gladly defer to your expertise in this area. Thank you. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 01:43, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello friend, I just saw your answer. I think we should come to a common point, because that you left contains a lot of incorrect information and weak sources. From what I put, what things in your opinion do not contribute or are weak? Knowing that, I can make a correct edit. Greetings. Augustogonzalezmor (talk) 20:04, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, I thought I had explained it in my previous comment. It is preferred that you not use sources that are not considered reliable, such as social media, primary sources (self-published content), etc. Please consult WP::Reliable sources. Thank you :) Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 04:43, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, friend. I'm going to go back to the edit I made and delete the things that you say it's not appropriate to put. Greetings Augustogonzalezmor (talk) 17:35, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, friend. I've already added a few things and didn't include the things you questioned above. Greetings Augustogonzalezmor (talk) 19:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi there, I went ahead and copy-edited your work. You added all bare URLs, which I had to fix. Please try to reference correctly next time. I also replaced some content that you removed without explanation. Lastly, I removed the names of columnists that didn't have wikilinks or references. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 23:12, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Welcome Augustogonzalezmor! Hello Augustogonzalezmor. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!

I'm Ad Orientem, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type  here on your talk page and someone will try to help. To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Mypage/sandbox&action=edit&preload=Template:User_Sandbox/preload create your own personal sandbox] for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put  on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Please remember to: The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the OOUI JS signature icon LTR.png button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes  at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp.
 * Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.

 Sincerely, Ad Orientem (talk) 03:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC)   [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ad_Orientem&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Español

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

עברית

Русский

日本語

Polski

فارسی Ad Orientem (talk) 03:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to El Líbero, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:08, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Hello, I'm Bedivere. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to El Líbero seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bedivere (talk) 04:44, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Disruptive editing
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at El Líbero, you may be blocked from editing. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 23:12, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.