User talk:AuoueioA

1 &

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 21:46, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at List of oldest continuously inhabited cities. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. signed,Rosguill talk 22:06, 15 August 2023 (UTC)


 * You still don't seem to know what a WP:EDITWAR is. Your repeatedly restoring your preferred content at List of oldest continuously inhabited cities is a textbook example of edit warring; rather than gaining consensus for your desired content on the article talk page, you are instead re-inserting it despite it being removed by other editors. It doesn't matter if you're right; you must not edit war. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106;&#x1D110;&#x1d107; 00:55, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The other editor (not editors) was offered to take it to Talk - but refused/ignored it; invited to read the cold facts from the refs - but refused/ignored that too. Just how much more civil and diligent do admins expect contributing editors to be? Some have the bar set way too high here, in both new content being added and the way it's added. AuoueioA (talk) 01:05, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Entirely civil and entirely diligent, that's how much. If you can't get WP:CONSENSUS on the talk page, it's not going to go in. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106;&#x1D110;&#x1d107; 01:19, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Again, the other editor was offered Talk but ignored. Besides, You don't need to cite that the sky is blue. AuoueioA (talk) 01:39, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Again, being correct with your edits is not a defense to edit warring. You can't edit war with someone demanding a citation for the sky being blue- even if that is demonstratably incorrect to do. There are proper channels to stop such behavior. 331dot (talk) 09:09, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:49, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Federal Government
Hey,


 * - Efendić, actively calling upon the current Federal government to fix the "Zrak" issue - not refuting the government;


 * - Ogrešević, criticizing the Government and speaking about Nikšić how his term as Prime Minister will be possibly be tough; both within the last two months. Neither of them clearly opposing the Government and its formation.

Also, Schmidt does have the majority of support in the PIC, apart from Russia and China for obvious reasons. The PIC works on a majority based consensus, not a unanimous one. (London Conference conclusions - PIC link) In addition, in both refs you've used regarding Ogrešević and Efendić, neither of them don't say they don't recognize the government and both refer to Nikšić as the incumbent Prime Minister.

Stop editing the article based on what you like it to be. I'm going to restore the last version of it for the last time I hope. Bakir123 (talk) 16:08, 22 August 2023 (UTC)