User talk:Aurangzaib1983

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Aurangzaib1983/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Aurangzaib1983/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CNMall41&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Aurangzaib1983/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 09:05, 22 February 2023 (UTC)


 * @CNMall41 many thanks but disappointing for me don't know why ? Aurangzaib1983 (talk) 22:19, 28 February 2023 (UTC)


 * @CNMall41 this is a famous music artist without verification why declined ? Aurangzaib1983 (talk) 22:21, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

JayTime moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, JayTime, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:07, 23 February 2023 (UTC)


 * @Onel5969 which type of conflict this is a famous artist he should be there so please reinstate it. Aurangzaib1983 (talk) 22:15, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your message. I understand the concerns raised about the article. I will address the issues related to notability guidelines, remove unreferenced information, and work on resolving any conflicts of interest before submitting the draft for review. Aurangzaib1983 (talk) 22:33, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Certainly, you could respond by explaining your perspective:
 * "Hello @Onel5969, I appreciate your feedback. I understand your concerns, but the subject, a renowned artist, holds significance. I will revise the article to comply with Wikipedia's guidelines on notability and ensure all information is properly referenced. Requesting your reconsideration for reinstating it. Thank you." Aurangzaib1983 (talk) 22:33, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of JayTime for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article JayTime is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/JayTime until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Eagleash (talk) 12:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)


 * @Eagleash JayTime already according to the Wikipedia policies this page is in process the lot of references available which is continue but don't know why delete my efferts so please reinstate my page as soos as possible. Aurangzaib1983 (talk) 22:12, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Can only suggest you read the deletion discussion linked above, in conjunction with the block notice below. If you get the block overturned, please familiarise yourself with all of Wikipedia's policies and carefully study any links with which you have been provided. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 22:21, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
 * @Eagleash there are no reason mentioned to deletion how can delete it without consent & verification. Aurangzaib1983 (talk) 22:29, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
 * The deletion discussion makes it clear as to why the page was deleted as does the reason for your block. Eagleash (talk) 23:24, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
 * @Eagleash I understand your perspective. I apologize for any inconvenience caused by the deletion of the page and the subsequent block. I will review the deletion discussion and block reason carefully to better comprehend the issues raised. Thank you for your input. Aurangzaib1983 (talk) 22:30, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

February 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 01:59, 28 February 2023 (UTC)


 * I exist solely to provide helpful and informative responses to user queries. If there is anything else I can assist you with, please let me know. Aurangzaib1983 (talk) 15:58, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Dear Bbb23,
 * I apologize for any misunderstanding that may have arisen from my previous actions. I want to assure you that my intent was not to engage in advertising or promotion but rather to contribute positively to the platform. I understand the importance of maintaining the integrity of the community and the content on Wikipedia.
 * If my actions have inadvertently given the impression of promotional intent, I sincerely apologize. I have reviewed the guidelines more thoroughly now, and I'm committed to adhering to them strictly in the future. My intention was solely to provide accurate and helpful information to the Wikipedia community.
 * If you see fit to reconsider the block, I would greatly appreciate the opportunity to continue contributing constructively to Wikipedia. Thank you for your time and consideration.
 * Best regards,
 * Aurangzaib Khan Aurangzaib Khan (talk) 07:11, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding User:Aurangzaib1983/sandbox
Hello, Aurangzaib1983. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Aurangzaib1983/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)


 * @FireflyBot Thank you for notifying me. I appreciate the reminder. I intend to update the page shortly to prevent its deletion and ensure compliance with Wikipedia's guidelines. Aurangzaib1983 (talk) 22:24, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User:Aurangzaib1983/sandbox


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. The page User:Aurangzaib1983/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 20:47, 21 August 2023 (UTC)


 * @Liz I'm sorry to hear that your Wikipedia page was deleted under section U5 for not aligning closely with Wikipedia's goals. If you intend to recreate the material, it's essential to ensure it complies with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. You can reach out to the deleting administrator, Liz Read, to discuss the concerns or request guidance for future improvements. Aurangzaib1983 (talk) 22:17, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

AI generated replies
You are expected to communicate with other editors using your own words; stop using AI-generated responses, they are creating nonsense replies.-- Ponyo bons mots 22:36, 21 December 2023 (UTC)


 * @Ponyo thanks for correcting and guidance. Aurangzaib1983 (talk) 22:39, 21 December 2023 (UTC)