User talk:Aureez/Archive3

RE
Yeah, I agree.-- Will C  19:56, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Its possible. Do you have an idea of who it might be a sock of?-- Unquestionable Truth -- 22:59, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Well then, I'll have to look up the contribution history pages of other users involved to see If there's a similar editing pattern.-- Unquestionable Truth -- 23:40, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * That's true. Anyway, I'll check it out.-- Unquestionable Truth -- 23:44, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - September and October 2009
Note: the Newsletter is "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the gray bar. If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list. This Newsletter was delivered by Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 19:38, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 04:04, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

RE:
Thank you. I did re-add the info, but I used the same PW Insider source because they have the dates and cities that were listed in the memo. He must have somehow misread the source since I and another editor both used the PW Insider link and he somehow thought it was Scoops. Wwehurricane1 (talk) 23:25, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Your source actually got the information from my source, lol. There's a link at the top of the article on PW Torch to the information on PW Insider. Wwehurricane1 (talk) 23:36, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 23:44, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 14:54, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 12:13, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: User talk:TJ Spyke. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Right back at ya buddy.  TJ   Spyke   22:15, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 12:49, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 04:52, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 15:09, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

List of Formula One drivers
Fantastic work so far. Let me know when you're done for the day, I was planning to do some work at some stage but clearly there's no rush when you're also doing a very good job.

There is one thing though, I very deliberately separated races and starts. There are many drivers who didn't qualify for a lot of races (and in a lot of cases drivers that NEVER started a race). For these reasons I think that distinction is important. WFCforLife (talk) 16:01, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I've used Michael Schumacher He is listed as Michael Schumacher, but the table sorts itself as if he were Schumacher, Michael. WFCforLife (talk) 16:11, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Try sorting, for instance, drivers beginning with 'O' in this diff. It does sort them in alphabetical order of surname. The reason it currently sorts some drivers by first name is that I've only done C-Z. Drivers whose surnames begin with A and B are sorted by first name. WFCforLife (talk) 16:33, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * That's brilliant. Thanks for your help so far, you've got a lot done! WFCforLife (talk) 16:49, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * That sounds good. Once the table is finished I think referencing is the only real bone of contention. I'm more of a casual F1 fan so I'm not 100% sure where to look for references either, but I'm sure it won't be too difficult. I'll leave a note at WP:F1 to see if anyone might be willing to help. WFCforLife (talk) 16:16, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * For the nationality table I don't like the last column (personally I'd change it to simply current drivers, and &mdash; those countries without one). What changes did you have in mind? WFCforLife (talk) 16:30, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Given that the champions are actually highlighted in yellow in the main table, I agree with simplifying that. WFCforLife (talk) 16:55, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

FLC
For the moment I won't change it back, but back up your claims. There is NOTHING against having the other parts highlighted. If you think it doesn't work, then bring it the article up for review again and see yourself proven wrong. The article was promoted with it, so until proven otherwise, it IS acceptable. You may not like that, but it's true.  TJ   Spyke   21:52, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * First, I didn't say anything about bolding (highlighting and bolding are two separate things). Second, you failed to show where it says a FL can't use hightlighting. All you and Wrestlinglover keep saying is "this is how current FL should be". You never show where it says this is required for current FL. If you think it's that important, bring up the lists to be re-reviewed and see what admins involved in promoting lists think. Neither you nor Wrestlinglover have ever backed up your claims, so right now they are nothing more than your opinions of what looks good and the lists will keep the format that looks better and is what got them promoted originally.  TJ   Spyke   22:08, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * My last edit only put the highlighting back in, not the bolding (although it does look better with bolding). Also, you STILL have not shown any proof of these so-called new standards for FL (like an admin saying in a FLN to remove them). Unless you have some proof, then all you keep saying is your opinion.  TJ   Spyke   22:50, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Besides the fact that WP:COLORS says no such thing (so I don't know what that other user is talking about), he does not say only 1 column can be colored. You are assuming that (and you know what happens when you assume?). Even if he did say that, then that would means the "days held" column would get highlighted too.  TJ   Spyke   00:26, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * FFS, stop mentioning Bold. YOU are the one that keeps mentioning that. The "+" is a symbol, so that cell would get highlighted too (not just the name of the wrestler). The example you put on my talkpage is good and what should be used.  TJ   Spyke   01:39, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Me not admitting anything? It took THREE replies from me before you finally actually answered me (and even that wasn't a good answer).  TJ   Spyke   01:49, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I asked you THREE times to provide proof of anyone saying something about highlights or this so-called new standard for FL, only after asking three times did you finally do so. I don't know if you were just being stubborn, or slow, or something else. You also keep ASSuming things (where did I say I refuse or accept it?). I merely pointed out that the editor's reasoning he gave you is flawed because COLORS doesn't say what he claimed it does.  TJ   Spyke   02:06, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I am not trying to be rude. However, when you keep spouting BS (I never said anything about Bolding, but on multiple occasions in this discussion you said I did), sidestepping questions (I had to ask THREE times before you finally answered where this so-called new FL stuff came from), ignoring other stuff (like how that editor was mis-quoting COLORS), and assuming you know what I think, it's hard to have a discussion with you. You are not trying to discuss this, you kept avoiding actually answering and instead talked about unrelated stuff (which makes you like Sarah Palin). I never said highlighting should be the ONLY way to present the info, but using highlights makes it easier to spot the relevant info and can/should be used in addition to symbols.   TJ   Spyke   02:26, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Please calm down this discussion. This is not constructive and approaching the limits of acceptable conduct under WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 05:53, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Spyke
If you want to continue the debate with TJ Spyke then I suggest you find an appropriate mediator since the current way of carrying on the dispute does not seem to be working for anyone. The mediation cabal might be a good first stop for you. Guy (Help!) 11:51, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

ANI
I don't want you to accuse me of being uncivil again, so I am politely asking you why you didn't bother informing me you were bringing up a discussion on me at ANI? The message at the top of that page says (and I quote):

"You must notify any user that you discuss. You may use to do so.".

This means you were supposed to let me know. The only reason I even found out was because I was looking at the edit log of an IP and noticed they had made a comment at ANI with my name as the section title.  TJ   Spyke   00:51, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Then I apologize, I guess I didn't see it since when I logged on this morning I also got a notice from a bot (regarding an image that is no longer being used) and didn't see it. I still don't think you needed to bring it to ANI, I thought we were having a friendly debate/discussion.  TJ   Spyke   00:58, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * $20 says that IP was me, lol. Wwehurricane1 (talk) 01:01, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Afkatk, I never said anything about your intelligence.  TJ   Spyke   15:15, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:49, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

List of Formula One drivers
I like the rationale behind the new key, but the colours need a rethink. They're far too similar to one another in my opinion. They're used on the main page because they subtly compliment one another. Maybe the current yellow is a bit too dramatic, but for the purposes of a key we should go for colours that are somewhat different to one another. Perhaps #F2E0CE, #CEF2E0 and #F2CEE0? Regards, WFCforLife (talk) 05:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

The WPVG Newsletter (Q4 2009)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  21:02, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 22:44, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - November and December 2009
Note: the Newsletter is "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the gray bar. If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list. This Newsletter was delivered by  xenobot  14:33, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

South Park edits
I see you've taken out the episode navigation box from quite a few South Park episode articles, what was the rationale? Alastairward (talk) 21:12, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 08:05, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 14:04, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi
Thanks a lot for your recent FLC reviews. They're much appreciated! Dabomb87 (talk) 22:21, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Reply to your message on my talk page
I've dealt with him long enough to know he just should be ignored. I've removed the block he placed on you. Any further problems, just let me know. I'm not as active as I would like, but I check my talk pages every few days usually. RobJ1981 (talk) 04:28, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:14, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/Black Eyed Peas discography/archive2
Hi, can you comment on the reliability of Everyhit.com at the above FLC? Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 00:32, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of forty-plus point games by Kobe Bryant/archive1
Hi. This FLC on which you have commented has been restarted because the consensus was unclear. Can you revisit to make sure your comments have been addressed, and if possible, make a declaration of Support, Oppose or Neutral? Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 16:38, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

United States Secretary of Transportation
Thanks for your comments at Featured list candidates/United States Secretary of Transportation/archive1. Could you please revisit the article/FAC and either support or give additional comments? Thanks, Reywas92 Talk 22:31, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Pussycat Dolls discography
heya, a lil while ago you made comments at the above's FLC discussion, however it was not promoted due to a general lack of interest. so was wondering if you could revisit and add any comments here? thanks :) Mister sparky (talk) 22:00, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, can you take a second look here and see whether you are ready to comment further or if you are still opposed? Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 03:10, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 20:35, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of Boston Red Sox first-round draft picks/archive1
Mind stopping by this FLC if you get the chance? I know I shouldn't be trolling for reviews, but you've previously commented on similar lists of mine and this FLC has sadly languished with few reviews for nearly a month now. Staxringold talkcontribs 07:13, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

FLC
Hi. You left some comments at Featured list candidates/List of Braathens destinations/archive1 a while ago. When you have time, could you cap or respond or on my replies. Thanks, <strong style="color:green;">Arsenikk <sup style="color:grey;">(talk)  20:48, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/Italian orders of knighthood/archive2
Hi, you reviewed this list's first FLC, which failed because of lack of consensus. Can you pop in at the second FLC real quick? Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 01:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Also, Featured list candidates/List of New Testament uncials/archive1 needs a follow-up. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:25, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

rationale
what is rationale? Mario &amp; Luigi RPG 3 (talk) 23:28, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Saw media FLC
Hello, I believe I have addressed your comments at the FLC for List of Saw media. Thanks for the comments, Ground  Z3R0   002  01:48, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

FLC
is it ok now? Nergaal (talk) 01:51, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * fixed them. Nergaal (talk) 23:38, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 02:04, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

FL Nomination of Vladimir Horowitz
User:Etincelles has made the changes that you have requested on the nomination. Could you please have a look and review them again. Thanks-- Pianoplonkers (talk • contribs) 16:24, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Saw media FLC
Okay I changed all of the about.com sources to amazon.com for the List of Saw media FLC. Does this satisfy your concerns? Ground Z3R0   002  18:14, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of Metallica concert tours/archive2
Hi, the above FLC has been restarted. Can you revisit it to ensure that your previous comments have been resolved? Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 22:50, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 12:23, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of Governors of Maine/archive1
I have restarted the nomination because the consensus is unclear. Please check back at the FLC to ensure your concerns have been addressed. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:41, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

==Featured list candidates/List of United States Military Academy alumni (Confederate States Army)/archive1 Hi Afkatk, thanks for all your efforts in reviewing many of our FLCs. This list has some outstanding concerns of yours which may now have been addressed. Would you mind popping back and seeing if you are happy with the list? Thanks again. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:18, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 11:24, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 23:14, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - January and February 2010
Note: the Newsletter is "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the gray bar. If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list. This Newsletter was delivered by xenobot  13:52, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 01:51, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 20:44, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 18:09, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User WP Curling
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Boing!   said Zebedee  20:44, 28 March 2010 (UTC)