User talk:Aurelien.desbrieres

No personal attacks
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parabola GNU/Linux. Please comment on the content and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. - Ahunt (talk) 11:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Computers Wihtout Borders


A tag has been placed on Computers Wihtout Borders, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. West Eddy (talk) 06:55, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Computers Wihtout Borders


A tag has been placed on Computers Wihtout Borders, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ankit Maity Talk Contribs 06:57, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Note
Hi, I deleted the page since (a) it largely promotes its subject matter, as opposed to being an encyclopedic article about it, and (b) it copies verbatim a website which has a Copyright symbol at the bottom. Geeks Without Borders, by contrast, does not seem to do either of these things. Having said which, if you feel it does not merit inclusion on Wikipedia, you will have to submit a request at WP:Articles for deletion and state your arguments there, trying to persuade other editors. But note that the fact that the organization does not exist any more is not really in itself a reason to delete the WP article on it – otherwise we would have to delete Enron, Whig Party etc.  It Is Me Here   t / c 09:41, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Poppy-project
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Poppy-project, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.poppy-project.org/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:44, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Poppy-project


A tag has been placed on Poppy-project, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Largo Plazo (talk) 11:25, 9 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi. If the Poppy Project is notable (which is determined according to Wikipedia's notability guidelines), then it's a valid topic for a Wikipedia article. But a few notes:
 * The article is promotional in tone. Its purpose is obviously to interest people in the project. This isn't surprising given that you've copied the text from the project's home page. Encyclopedia articles must be objective, neutral. An encyclopedia article doesn't refer to "you" and "we".
 * An article doesn't contain commentary about the article. The justifications you've written shouldn't be there. If you want to communicate with readers of the article about your intent, that goes on the article's Talk page.
 * From your commentary, you seem to think that you need permission to write about the project. You don't. What you do need is permission to copy content from elsewhere. Your content is copied from the project's home page. That could be OK under certain circumstances, but otherwise it's a violation of copyright law. If the project were willing to permit text from its website to be copied to Wikipedia, then there is a mechanism for that. However, in this case, it would still come back to that particular text being promotional, so we can't have it here regardless of whether the project has given its permission.
 * —Largo Plazo (talk) 11:37, 9 July 2014 (UTC)


 * I saw your post on the article's Talk page before the article was deleted. "Promote" doesn't mean "sell". You can promote your favorite movie star, a piece of legislation, or participation in an event, all without profit motive. The article was written in a manner intended to draw interest and involvement. —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:31, 9 July 2014 (UTC)


 * hum ... i do not try to make a promote article but an encyclopedique article about a fact. This bot is real and the world first 3D printed.

I have contact the author, he will give me a text a bit more encyclopedic that should better correspond to you wish.


 * You keep repeating that the bot is real and that it's the first 3D printed one. No one has said that it isn't.
 * I looked at the page on the project website where you said you found "permission" to create the article. I noticed that the person who wrote the page encouraging people to write an article specified, responsibly, that it should be written in conformance with Wikipedia's guidelines. —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:59, 9 July 2014 (UTC)