User talk:Aurelien3381

Welcome!

Hello, Aurelien3381, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! De728631 (talk) 19:11, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Speedy deletion nomination of The G Project


A tag has been placed on The G Project requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. De728631 (talk) 19:11, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The G Project - The 21st Century Market


A tag has been placed on The G Project - The 21st Century Market, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. E. Fokker (talk) 20:03, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Articles on future predicted events
I see that at Talk:The G Project you wrote "This article is about a new company that is going to go online in about a month and a half. The article is linked to the website and not much can be added right now. Would you please maintain this article until the the website goes online and more can be said?" However, Wikipedia's notability guidelines require that articles exist only for subjects which have already received significant coverage in reliable independent sources. We do not accept articles on subjects which have not yet received coverage on the basis that we expect them to become notable in the future, as you can see if you read WP:CRYSTAL. If you want to get an idea what is required you may like to read Notability (organizations and companies), and perhaps also the general notability guideline. FAQ/Organizations is also somewhat relevant. In addition, we do not have "placeholder" articles waiting until someone writes a proper article: we wait until someone is ready to write a proper article. I also see that the text of the article was written in terms which promoted its subject, telling us what a grand job it is planning to do, rather than neutrally informing us what it is. Such promotional articles are contrary to Wikipedia's policy, and it would have been deleted for that reason had there been no other reason. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:58, 17 February 2011 (UTC)