User talk:Aurelija Patricija

Help me!
Hello! I have noticed that on of the articles I have contributed to is not linked to a wider category - there is an article where the churches which have a name of St. Michael are presented in one list and the church of St. Michael in Vilnius was not there. While trying to edit the article about St. Michael's Church in Vilnius I have accidentally edited the information related with an image which was uploaded by another user (Arthistorian1977 I assume). I would like to ask how could the image be put back? And also how could the article of St. Michael's Church in Vilnius be included in the list of the churches which have a name of St. Michael? (It appears there but while pressing on the title it is red and does not lead to the article).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Michael%27s_Church#Lithuania

Aurelija Patricija (talk) 15:51, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Aurelija Patricija
 * . Links have to be exact, including punctuation. The article did not show in the list at St. Michael's Church because in its title you had used a curly apostrophe  ’  , but the entry in the list had a straight apostrophe   '   . I have moved the article (changed its title) to use a straight apostrophe, leaving a redirect from the old title, because Wikipedia prefers the straight apostrophe (see MOS:PUNCT), so now it is a blue-link in the list. The reason the image disappeared was that in this edit you introduced a comma after "St. Michael's" in the file name, so that it no longer matched the actual file. A useful tip is: always click "Show preview" and make sure your changes have the intended effect, before you click "Save page". Regards, JohnCD (talk) 16:44, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Hello, I'm Howicus. I noticed that you made a change to an article, History of Vilnius, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 02:52, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Help me!
Hello, I have a query about inline citations. An article has 8 references but a table with this text comes in front of it:

This article includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (January 2012)

Could you please explain me the difference between inline citations and references? An article uses sources such as BBC and other sources from 4 different countries.

Many thanks,

A. P.

Aurelija Patricija (talk) 00:56, 25 June 2015 (UTC)


 * "Inline citations" commonly refers to the footnotes that follow specific statements and clarify which of the references supports that statement. Basically, if a reader wants to verify a claim, they shouldn't have to look up eight references to find the correct one. See WP:Referencing for beginners on how to easily create nicely-formatted footnotes for the references. By the way, if you ask about a particular page, a link to that page would help. Huon (talk) 01:04, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Help me!
Hello. One of my articles has been named named an orphan: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Casimir%27s_Lithuanian_Church

Now two other articles link to it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_churches_in_London https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benedict_Williamson

Why is it still an orphan article?

Thanks,

Aurelija Patricija (talk) 22:41, 14 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Because nobody had removed the tag yet. I have now done so. Huon (talk) 22:45, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:St. Casimir, sculptor Antanas Žukauskas.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:St. Casimir, sculptor Antanas Žukauskas.jpg, which you've attributed to Sigitas Matulis. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 14:59, 18 July 2015 (UTC)