User talk:Aurelius44

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Burke (Irish revolutionary and sportsman) has been accepted
 Thomas Burke (Irish revolutionary and sportsman), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  DGG ( talk ) 01:10, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Thomas_Burke_(Irish_revolutionary_and_sportsman) help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Speedy deletion nomination of Patrick Egan (Catholic priest)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Patrick Egan (Catholic priest) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 16:53, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fr Patrick Egan (Catholic priest)


A tag has been placed on Fr Patrick Egan (Catholic priest) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. creffett (talk) 01:26, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Timothy Crowley


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Timothy Crowley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  GILO  A& E&uArr;  16:21, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thomas Burke (Irish revolutionary and sportsman), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joseph Burke ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Thomas_Burke_%28Irish_revolutionary_and_sportsman%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Thomas_Burke_%28Irish_revolutionary_and_sportsman%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Peter Crowley (Irish revolutionary) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Peter Crowley (Irish revolutionary), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Christopher Patrick Burke


The article Christopher Patrick Burke has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The references offered support WP:EXIST only. No indication that this person meets WP:NBIO. WP:NOTMEMORIAL and WP:NOTGENEALOGY would seem to apply."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guliolopez (talk) 20:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Burkes of Duleek Street


The article Burkes of Duleek Street has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The references offered support WP:EXIST only. No indication that these people meet WP:NBIO or WP:NORG as a 'group'. Even if individual members of this family are notable, WP:NOTINHERITED would suggest that notability is not 'transferred' to other members of the same family. WP:NOTMEMORIAL and WP:NOTGENEALOGY would also seem to apply."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guliolopez (talk) 20:59, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christopher Burke (Irish revolutionary), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joseph Burke ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Christopher_Burke_%28Irish_revolutionary%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Christopher_Burke_%28Irish_revolutionary%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bridget Mary Crowley


The article Bridget Mary Crowley has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The subject is the sister of notable Irish revolutionaries, but does not appear to be notable in her own right. The article's current sources only support WP:EXIST, and my search on Newspapers.com and Google Books did not turn up anything that would establish notability. WP:NOTGENEOLOGY and WP:INVALIDBIO apply."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 03:59, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Peter Crowley (Irish revolutionary)


Hello, Jburke2005. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Peter Crowley".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 16:27, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Scope
Hiya. Hope all's well. By way of an extension to the recent "articles for discussion" threads, and in light of some further/recent content submissions, I thought it worthwhile highlighting a few quick things about project scope. Without beating about the bush: As with your other recent submissions, I will be moving for a deletion of the Bridget Mary Crowley shortly. You will receive a more "formal" notice of this shortly. All the best. Guliolopez (talk) 20:37, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not intended to be a free web-hosting site for family history or family genealogy content. While it's great that you have amassed some family history stories about your forebears, you need to find somewhere else to put it. Just because someone is notable to you or your family, doesn't mean that they are notable under the project's notability criteria. Please see WP:NBIO, WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:NOTGENEALOGY and related guidelines.
 * Wikipedia is not intended to be a mirror of content already published by other online projects. While, for example, the Military Archives and Bureau of Military History catalogues may be useful in supporting content (as references), it is not appropriate to wholescale "copy and paste" content from that project to Wikipedia. As you did from here over to here. This is doubly problematic when the content at the original source is managed under different licence or copyright terms than those which Wikipedia relies upon. Please see WP:NOTMIRROR, WP:COPYPASTE, WP:COPYVIO and other policies.
 * Wikipedia is not intended to be a catalogue of everyone who ever lived through (or involved in) every single conflict or war. While project guidelines afford some notability to high-ranking military people (or those who received significant coverage or gallantry medals or the like), there is no way we can reasonably have articles on the 70,000 people who received medals or pensions for their involvement in the War of Independence or Civil War for example. Or the millions of other people involved in the thousands or other wars in other countries. Please see WP:MILPERSON, WP:NBIO and other related policies.


 * Hi,
 * Thanks for your politeness. I understand your qualms and do not mind if the page is removed if you believe it should be. When you say "copy-paste", I must say that most of it is not, and is a summary I typed out based off of the document to aid me in writing a contribution to a book. Though part of it is the exact words from the document, I had to type that out too. Anyway, fair enough about all that, I won't contest that deletion. Merry Christmas to you and a happy new year! Thanks Jburke2005 (talk) 20:46, 24 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Hiya.
 * RE: Politeness. No worries. You're welcome. Costs nothing.
 * RE: Not verbatim copy-and-paste. In honesty, while it is fair to say that you didn't copy and paste the entirety of the pension/service certificate application, what has been included is a near verbatim copy/paste. (I note for example that you left out this piece of text "She attended Sunville camp a few times a week and did some cooking and washing for the I.R.A. there". But the text which follows it is exactly verbatim from the source: "She helped after Glenbrohane fight when the area was surrounded by scouting the roads and escorting men until they left the area". This isn't really "on".)
 * RE: Book. Great. Sounds like you have another outlet for all of your research. Hopefully that means you'll stop using Wikipedia as an "interim" host for that content. Let me know when the book is done. Will give it a look-in.
 * Have a great holiday! Nollaig shona agus athbhliain faoi mhaise duit! Guliolopez (talk) 21:07, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Bridget Mary Crowley for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bridget Mary Crowley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bridget Mary Crowley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guliolopez (talk) 20:50, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Peter William Crowley concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Peter William Crowley, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Peter William Crowley


Hello, Jburke2005. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Peter William Crowley".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 04:21, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brian Egan


The article Brian Egan has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "this person has zero notability. Friendship with a former president is not evidence of notability. Article lacks proper information about ordination, incardination and cause for allocation of apostolic pronotary status."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ə XPLICIT 07:13, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Jburke2005

Thank you for creating Brian Egan.

User:Whiteguru, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Proposed deletion of Patrick Crowley (Catholic priest)


The article Patrick Crowley (Catholic priest) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of any notability. To extent that WP:A7 might apply. This reads like a WP:NOTGENEALOGY entry on an otherwise 'normal' clergy member. The refs (a family history website, a census record and an obit) barely support the basic facts (DOB/death/etc). None of them (and nothing at all in the text) establish any notability under any criteria. Being a missionary priest (and having brothers who died during the War of Indepndence) does not confer notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guliolopez (talk) 00:22, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joseph Mark Crowley


The article Joseph Mark Crowley has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable person. The only claims to notability here are 'brother of hunger strikers' (WP:NOTINHERIT) and 'fought in Civil War' (along with 70,000 other people). This is another WP:NOTGENEALOGY from a user who continues to create articles on multiple members of the Crowley family. As if each is independently/automatically notable. Each is not."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guliolopez (talk) 00:30, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of James Michael Crowley


The article James Michael Crowley has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable person. The only claims to notability here are 'brother of hunger strikers' (WP:NOTINHERIT) and 'fought in Civil War' (along with 70,000 other people). This is another WP:NOTGENEALOGY from a user who continues to create articles on multiple members of the Crowley family. As if each is independently/automatically notable. Each is not."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guliolopez (talk) 00:32, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Scope (revisited)
Hello. Me again. With a reminder on WP:NOTGENEALOGY, WP:NOTMEMORIAL and WP:NOTWEBHOST. Again. As per our discussion in December 2019, and while I am hopeful that you finished your contribution to that local/family history work that you were working on, the scope of this project hasn't changed in the meantime. Wikipedia is (still) not a publisher or re-publisher of memorial, genealogical or family history content. Almost every family in Ireland has members who were in the clergy, involved in tan/civil war events (or related to people who were), or had drapery businesses and the like. Wikipedia is not a place for these people to publish these family history stories or biographic entries. Biogrpahpical entries in Wikipedia MUST be based on WP:NBIO guidelines (and supported by published works that span significantly beyond census entries, birth/death registries or short obits in local papers). Please find another outlet for your family history content. Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 00:41, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello. Again. As above, Wikipedia is not a personal/family genealogy site. Please stop treating it as such. As per our previous conversation, I'm sure (as part of your family history project) you've built-up a series of obits, tidbits and census hits on the Burke family. Unless they are so extensive and impressive (on an individual basis) that WP:SIGCOV and WP:NBIO is firmly established for a given family member, they shouldn't be republished on Wikipedia. This encyclopedia project has different goals to your family history project (or those of Ancestry.com). Please stop conflating your goals with this project's goals. If you're having a hard time separating the two, then you might want to take (another) look at WP:NOTHERE, WP:COI and WP:SPA. Guliolopez (talk) 13:42, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aidan Burke


The article Aidan Burke has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of notability. Yet another WP:NOTMEMORIAL and WP:NOTGENEALOGY submission from this contributor. The only sources available seem to be a findagrave entry and a single obituary. Otherwise the claims to notability are 'wrote essays and corresponded with notable people'."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guliolopez (talk) 12:08, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Christopher P. Burke for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christopher P. Burke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Christopher P. Burke until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guliolopez (talk) 12:33, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Aidan Burke for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aidan Burke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Aidan Burke until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guliolopez (talk) 16:55, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michael Crowley (Irish revolutionary and hunger striker)


The article Michael Crowley (Irish revolutionary and hunger striker) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of notability beyond BIO1E. As per body and refs, subject was one of many dozens of hunger strikers and one of many tens of thousands of people involved in the Irish War of Independence. As per recent AfDs, we do not need individual articles on every single member of the Crowley family. Also WP:NOTMEMORIAL and WP:NOTGENEALOGY."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guliolopez (talk) 12:41, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Guinness with two Ns
Hello. Did you create several new articles about Irish hunger strikers? Guinness is spelled incorrectly in all of them. I fixed two, John Power and Seán Hennessy, please correct the others. A few generations back, I am a Burke from Oranmore (?) County Galway (?), thank you for the information. DFS (talk) 18:03, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

I did indeed - I have corrected the misspellings just there! Glad you liked the articles! Jburke2005 (talk) 19:41, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Simon Colbran moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Simon Colbran, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 17:52, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Simon Colbran
Hello, Jburke2005. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Simon Colbran, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)