User talk:Auric/Archive 1

Piltdown World's Fair
I can't find any references to your "Piltdown World's Fair", so I'm assuming it was a hoax and you were just testing us out. I've deleted it. Deb 17:05, 19 May 2004 (UTC)


 * Believe it or not, I was actually serious. Oh well. Auric The Rad 17:34, May 19, 2004 (UTC)


 * If you really are serious, could you maybe give details, eg. when and where this event took place? It would also be a good idea to link the article to something; it was an "orphan". Deb 21:27, 19 May 2004 (UTC)


 * Only a mention in Abrell and Thompson's Actual Facts, no mention of place. The Spirit of Meat is supposedly stored in the basement of a museum in Ottawa. Auric The Rad 14:34, May 24, 2004 (UTC)

Haggis Tossing
Olympic demonstration sport? Umm I can't find any evidence. Kelvinc 21:16, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)


 * This site, http://www.scottishhaggis.co.uk/haggis_hurling.htm, says so. Auric The Rad 18:35, Aug 14, 2004 (UTC)

Bob Transformer
You added "Bob Transformer" to the transformer article. This appears to be entirely spurious; I'm just wondering why you added it. -- The Anome 09:57, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * I added this because I wanted to know if there was really a "Bob Transformer". I've come acrost it several times. You can take it out if you want to. Auric The Rad 15:27, Oct 20, 2004 (UTC)

Could those have been references to the clip: Basics of Electricity? You can find it on YouTube. Oh, and it's to be taken with a grain of salt => It's utter nonsense.

Copyright
Please don't directly copy material from the web such as this example. Keep it limited to using them as references only. Oberiko 14:32, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that. I thought that if I edited it for clatirt, correctness and grammar, it wouldn't be a copyvio anymore. I gess I was wrong. On the temp page, I've put back the things that I added myself. I hope that they will stay there. Auric The Rad 00:24, Oct 31, 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Image copyrights
Thanks for uploading Image:Papyrus.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use if you release it under the GFDL, or  if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much,   &mdash; Edwin Stearns | Talk 21:10, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)

WikiProject Discworld
WikiProject Discworld

Spam message: Having noticed you have made some great additions to the Discworld articles I thought you might be interested in this new WikiProject. It's at a very early stage and needs quite a bit of work. violet/riga (t) 21:44, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)

E-mail
Hi Auric, I sent you an e-mail, did you receive it? Jayjg |  (Talk)  19:55, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I've been busy with work. Auric The Rad 15:49, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Oh, that's fine, but did you get it? If not, I can re-send. Jayjg  |  (Talk)  16:49, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Re-send it. I've forgorren what it said.Auric The Rad 20:14, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC)

Basically it was this; about 5 months ago you added Emanuel Rabinovich as a fictional creation of Eustace Mullins to the List of fictional rabbis. I was wondering what your source for this was. Jayjg (talk) 22:19, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * My source was a book, titled ''The World's Greatest Mistakes - Nigel Blundell.

Fanconi Anemia
Auric, I'm new to Wikipedia, but not to FA. I was wondering what your conection is to this ultra-rare and usually unknown disease is. My younger brother has FA and I was his donor. Just interested. Feel free to email me at laonoodlekeemow@gmail.com. Aaron.

Picture of the island of stability
A long time ago, you requested a picture of this. Check out the new "see also" link. Does it suffice? I've watchlisted your talk page; you can reply here. --Smack (talk) 20:48, 28 August 2005 (UTC)


 * That's kind of what I wanted, but a smaller version was more in mind. The Encylopedia of Physics (2nd Ed.) has this, on page 1204, as a sort of graph and chart combined. It also mentions the reef of stability and the sea of instability. I have a scan of it but I didn't use it, because of copyright reasons. Auric 02:53, August 30, 2005 (UTC)

Social Technology
Dear friend,

Thank you for putting my article on Social Technology in the right category and marking it as a stub. I will try and extend this in the next few days. I am trying to add a section every day.

I feel like Alice in Wonderland. Please correct any errors that I make.

Best regards, Nirupma Kapoor neeray 18:26, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

User Categorisation
You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Canada page as living in or being associated with New Brunswick. As part of the User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in New Brunswick for instructions.--Rmky87 21:16, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

James Gregory
Please comment at Talk:James Gregory (mineralogist). --TantalumT e lluride 04:02, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Wikimedia Canada
Hi there! I'd like to invite you to explore Wikimedia Canada, and create a list of people interested in forming a local chapter for our nation. A local chapter will help promote and improve the organization, within our great nation. We'd also like to encourage everyone to suggest projects for our national chapter to participate in. Hope to see you there! -- user:zanimum

Hey
Hey thanks for joining sporewiki. I'm glad a more veteran wikipedian joined up with us. I was reading your large amount of userboxes and we have quite a lot of the same likes and other things, which is pretty sweet. Just wanted to say hello and welcome aboard. :) Chris M. 16:55, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * You're quite welcome. --Auric 22:20, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Deleting Camp Avoda
Hi, since you were involved with this article, you may want to see Articles for deletion/Camp Avoda (2nd nomination), best wishes, IZAK 14:13, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Phonautograph ncd.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Phonautograph ncd.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 01:08, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Johnny Sixarms
Please assert notability under WP:MUSIC - as of right now it is a CSD A7 candidate. - CrazyRussian talk/email 20:35, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * They were referred to in a Simpsons episode, 51 Google hits, two hit singles, and a web page. If that's not notable enough, at least I tried. -- Auric 20:49, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Vampires and prosopagnosia
Hi, do you have a source for the connection between the two? Doesn't sound obvious to me - seeing a face is one thing, recoginzing it is another. Regards, --194.145.161.227 19:16, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Nope, sorry. When I added this it seemed logical, but now that I've researched it more, it seems less so. Remove it it you want to. -- Auric 19:41, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks! :) --194.145.161.227 17:11, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Seattle Underground article
I was just reviewing and editing the Seattle Underground article you started, it has ended up to be a great article, but has NO references, or citations. Since it is your baby maybe you would like to help out? CrazyRob926 10:57, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Julia kendell
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Julia kendell, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Julia kendell is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Julia kendell, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 12:31, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Animal Protein Factor
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Animal Protein Factor, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of the page. Oo7565 18:31, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Goingpostalcov.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Goingpostalcov.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:43, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Fintan
Hi, you wrote the article on Fintan and included some reported dates for his age. Do you have references for those? Please respond at Talk:Annals of the Four Masters, which had taken the dates from your article. Thanks --Bazzargh (talk) 15:55, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Zatar1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Zatar1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AngleGrinderMan Symbol.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AngleGrinderMan Symbol.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Harry-potter chinese 070502.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Harry-potter chinese 070502.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Shadoevis.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Shadoevis.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:33, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Buu photo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Buu photo.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --01:08, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Ros0709 (talk) 08:07, 25 May 2008 (UTC)


 * When you subsequently added a tag you again removed the speedy deletion tag. Please do not remove the speedy tag from articles you create. However, you also removed the more obvious spam/review concerns so I have also removed all the tags. I'm not personally sure this author meets WP:N but there's one book of his on Amazon and there's certainly no case for speedy deletion on those grounds. Ros0709 (talk) 08:25, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you. --Auric (talk) 08:29, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Moose
Moose can interbreed w/ cattle?? --Rschmertz (talk) 04:26, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes they can. The first instance that I am aware of happened in the 1940's in Quebec, Canada. A randy moose mounted a cow and produced offspring. --Auric (talk) 19:39, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Lifetime and DEFAULTSORT
Hi, I noticed that you added DEFAULTSORT on pages that already contain Lifetime. Please note that Lifetime includes the DEFAULTSORT functionality, so adding DEFAULTSORT is superfluous in such cases. Regards, BNutzer (talk) 01:47, 17 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I used to do that, before I noticed that pages that I added as stubs were not sorted alphabetically without the DEFAULTSORT. Hopefully this has been fixed.--Auric (talk) 01:54, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Jon Balcourt is sorted in Category:United States composer stubs after I have removed DEFAULTSORT, so I guess it has been fixed ... BNutzer (talk) 02:08, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. --Auric (talk) 02:12, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Andre Migner dit Lagace notability
It is not my understanding that progeny confer notability upon a person. If you can point me towards consensus that they do, I'll be more than happy to remove the tag. Movingboxes (talk) 15:57, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * It seems awfully WP:OR to me. There are many people in history who have many progeny--without secondary sources citing him specifically for this reason (and that's different than sources just documenting lots of people track their ancestry to him), I don't see how it adds up to WP:N. Movingboxes (talk) 16:25, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice
Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 20:40, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Ovchinnikov
Do you have access to any sound clips from War and Peace, Andrei Rublev, or Ivan's Childhood, to include in the corresponding articles? Tautologist (talk) 19:32, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, No. --Auric (talk) 22:25, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Ben Hur (automobile)
Hi, do you have any more info about this car? I can find nothing on Google. If there's nothing but the one line about its existence out there, then it may not qualify as a wp:NOTABLE subject for an article (better perhaps as a single sentence in another, larger, related article. NJGW (talk) 18:10, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ben Hur (automobile)
A tag has been placed on Ben Hur (automobile) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. NJGW (talk) 15:30, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
I appreciated your message on the footnote problem at 1912 in poetry (editing while tired -- always a bad idea). Now fixed. Reconsideration (talk) 18:55, 29 December 2008 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. --Auric (talk) 21:42, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Re: warning left for me
Why did you leave me a new user warning over my edit to Monstermob. Inspection of the article would show clearly that the problem it has is a broken reference, and I'm hardly a new user. My edit didn't fix it, but neither did it remove any content. Rjwilmsi 15:12, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * When I saw the broken reference, I thought that your edit (the last edit) was the problem (it often is). I fixed it after. I was assuming good faith (not that you were a new user). --Auric (talk) 15:19, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ma'in Khaza'leh
A tag has been placed on Ma'in Khaza'leh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wperdue (talk) 23:37, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Minor Flag
Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.'  AngoraFish   木  20:40, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure why you put this here. Please clarify.--Auric (talk) 21:18, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Almost all your edits are tagged as 'minor', however the vast majority are not (see contribs and Help:Minor edit). Examples of edits which you have tagged as minor edits but which are not minor include your comment above, creating new pages, leaving warnings, adding content, changing titles and other significant edits. Per the above, "only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.'". AngoraFish   木  21:54, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * No, I meant what article. Besides, I use minor when creating new pages with material that is already present ie a bio is directly added to a category. The move is minor (rearranging of text without modifying content) so I tag it minor. Sometimes the tag is an error, since I have minor checked as a default and there is no way (that I know of) to change a tag once made. Most of my edits fall under Obvious factual errors and I mark them as such. --Auric (talk) 22:47, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Bob Flanagan
I'm so sorry for bringing this up here, i have no idea where else to look. I'm quite stuck and I really need help. I've been checking a lot of editorial pages, but arg, I'M STILL LOST!

I've wanted so badly to edit and help restore Bob Flanagan's page, I have a picture, permission from the photographer and everything, but I have NO idea whatsoever on how to add the image (I have a rough idea from all the tutorials I've, but nothing saying that I can and where!) and as I have a lot more information on him, I have no ability to work on it, due to time constraints and no one else who cares to help.

Also, his partner, Rose, had her page deleted, and there seems to be enough information on her floating around in places (including her own self-run page) that it can be put back up again. But again, I'm new at this and extremely lost!

I have a great amount of respect for Bob Flanagan, and I feel pretty terrible for not being able, by lack of experience and slight ignorance, to be capable of fixing it. It wouldn't take an exceptionally long period of time to fix either Ms. Rose's page or Mr. Flanagan's, just a little TLC, but if that's too much, no worries.

Thank you for reading... By the way: Love Canada, very beautiful country. If I could move out of the US, I'd move there most definitely. No Stahr (talk) 23:18, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * My advice is to take a look at Template:Infobox Person and go from there.--Auric (talk) 22:09, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Pierre Géraud-Keraod
Thank you so much for your additions! Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 02:48, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Alisa Apps
I have nominated Alisa Apps, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Alisa Apps. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. DreamGuy (talk) 13:45, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Um
Ouch! You've used a template to send a message to an experienced editor. Please review the essay Don't template the regulars or maybe listen to a little advice. Doesn't this feel cold, impersonal, and canned? It's meant in good humour. Best wishes. User:Auric (talk) 02:16, 19 October 2017 (UTC) She's written two dozen featured articles, including the one where you reverted her. Durova Charge! 02:18, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Dude, I don't think you understand - you don't substitute one template for another! Awadewit (talk) 02:27, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Ummm... I didn't. I simply rewrote the substed text to reflect what I thought without actually blanking the whole thing. I fix, I don't delete.--Auric (talk) 02:31, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Did you notice that most of the information you reinstated contradicted the main article text and the sources? Durova Charge! 02:38, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * No, I didn't. Sorry.--Auric (talk) 02:46, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Galactus Edit War Mediation
Hi. I'm trying to mediate an edit war over the Galactus article here. Can you chime in with your two cents? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 00:07, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * An expert on what? Galactus? Well, neither am I. That's why I went over the conflicted passages, and gave my view on them, while conceding that whether some of the facts used as bases for them was not something I could give personal knowledge on. I have no way of knowing who is an "expert" or not, and indeed, WP isn't based on expertise, but reliable sources, so I just went down the article's Edit History to contact editors who have edited the article. Nightscream (talk) 00:37, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Um, you asked for my two cents. Don't be angry that I gave them. And you did come across as an expert. Sorry if I misjudged.--Auric (talk) 00:47, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Despatches
Please note that despatches with an e is the official spelling in this instance when referring to Mentioned in Despatches or a despatch from a commander in the field as can be seen from the quoted sources. (see your edits to Thomas Blamey). David Underdown (talk) 20:31, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I was thinking about a dispatch, as despatch is the British spelling. --Auric (talk) 02:30, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of non-existent countries
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of non-existent countries. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/List of non-existent countries. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Mazen Abdul-Jawad
I have nominated Mazen Abdul-Jawad, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Mazen Abdul-Jawad. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Nathan  T 22:30, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

DEFAULTSORT
Thanks for your note. The trouble with the lifetime template is that the information in it is partially hidden, so it gets duplicated - see for example Herbert Winslow, or any of a couple of thousand other examples where there is (or was) a lifetime and one of the categories it generates or a DEFAULTSORT. This in turn leads to articles with inconsistent categories and conflicting DEFAULTSORTs. The benefit is that it is quicker to type, for setting up new articles, especially many of them. There is a subst only version "ltm" that can be used for this, 1909 of course it is one keystroke longer! Best regards, Rich Farmbrough, 13:44, 15 September 2009 (UTC).

Loose Women
You made an edit to Loose Women precisely when I was reverting some vandalism. I am sorry. Please make your edit again. Debresser (talk) 19:13, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Happy WikiBirthday (a day late)
I saw from here that it's been six years since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 03:09, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

thanks
Thanks for your help! Cozzycovers (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sarah Ann Island, Illinois


The article Sarah Ann Island, Illinois has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * what is the significance of the island

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Marine79 (talk) 16:13, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Drop bear sourcing
Thanks for the attempt to source a statement in the drop bear article, but nationmaster.com is just one of many sites that mirrors Wikipedia; you were just using an earlier version of the same article as a source. It's pretty hard going finding a source for something when there are dozens of varyingly obfuscated Wikipedia mirrors out there... --McGeddon (talk) 14:57, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Oops! Sorry about that!--Auric (talk) 14:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Bungee cord
Thanks for adding the correct stub for this article -- I couldn't find it. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:22, 12 March 2010 (UTC)


 * You're welcome.--Auric (talk) 22:24, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

dear Auric
thank you for working on Ian Sansom. He is worth an entry but I am Wiki challenged. --Goodwillfan (talk) 14:03, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of A.E. Manoharan


The article A.E. Manoharan has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Rettetast (talk) 20:05, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

The 1589 Geneva Bible
I note your addition to Bible errata. While not commenting on the "error", that Bible was printed - it is not a manuscript- afair it was the first in a roman font. ClemMcGann (talk) 14:55, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I was not the one who added it, I merely wikified it. Check the history.--Auric (talk) 14:57, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * ok ClemMcGann (talk) 23:24, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Template:Unfinished
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. The Evil IP address (talk) 19:00, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Kitchenuhmaykoosib monster
Hi. This article, created today, deals with a topic already dealt with here, another article created today. Your version contains more references and is better wikified; perhaps, since you're the only contributor, you may wish to merge the two articles. ^____^ Sorry if I bothered you. Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 15:22, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure, thanks!--Auric (talk) 15:30, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Pawn Stars
Thanks for fixing all those links. Great job! Nightscream (talk) 04:13, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Saint-Cricq High School
Hello, can you correc my mistakes in english, thank you ! France64160 (talk) 21:36, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Deadlink
About your rv of my deadlink tag here- fact is, yes, the page responds, but the content cited in the article is gone, apparently forever. Tagging it deadlink seemed completely appropriate, per WP:LINKROT - discuss. --Lexein (talk) 22:05, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:57, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Book urls
Hi,

Regarding your edit here, is there any guidance on where to put the google book preview url? I would use the url parameter for the front page, but the the pages parameter also allows urls and would take you directly to that specific page. Just seems more intuitive to me, and would allow multiple links to different sets of pages if necessary. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/complex 19:56, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

List of controversies involving the Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Thanks for your great work fixing up the references on this page. That was greatly needed, and appreciated. I thought I'd mention, however, that Wikipedia guidelines suggest that you should not "fix" or bypass redirects that aren't broken. Not a big deal - just for future reference. TheMightyQuill (talk) 03:58, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Next drive
As you are either a participant of WikiProject or the October wikification drive or have signed up to participate in the planned December drive, this probably concerns you. Discussions that have been inactive for a couple weeks regarding the December drive have been reactivated, and we would like you to participate in these discussions, and also consider joining the December drive. We have taken upon ourselves a massive workload, encompassing a backlog reaching June 2008 and comprising articles. Barnstars will be awarded to participating editors, and also, please invite your friends to join! Please do not reply to this message here. Either reply here, here or here.

For the December Drive Coordinators,.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 23:24, 29 November 2010 (UTC). Redirected here from User talk:Auric The Rad.

Invitation to particpate in the December 2010 Wikification Drive
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 18:30, 30 November 2010 (UTC). Redirected here from User talk:Auric The Rad.

Wandering Jew
Hi Auric! Can you please explain what this sentence means? ( 'The supposed presence of the Wandering Jew has occasionally been used as a pretext for searches of the Jewish Quarters'. ) Who was searching, why and when, and where? Why should the WJ have been needed as a pretext? Is there an example which can be cited of such a search, and which actally tells us anything about the Wandering Jew? Otherwise, I'm inclined to delete the sentence agan as it it does't seem to add anything to the article. With thanks,--Smerus (talk) 07:48, 11 December 2010 (UTC)


 * The source says it all. I can't be sure, but this was probably used to justify searches of Jewish homes, similar to modern day police justifying warrantless searches by saying that bin Laden had been spotted entering a house, ie hot pursuit.--Auric (talk) 19:28, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shahrokh Moshkin Ghalam‎


The article Shahrokh Moshkin Ghalam‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Please confirm your membership
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 19:17, 22 December 2010 (UTC).

Matty Goldberg
Thanks for your help with removing the speedy. TucsonDavid GOD BLESS THE U . S . A . 05:41, 25 December 2010 (UTC)