User talk:Auriong

History of Australia
Your additions to this article are inappropriate. It is intended to be a summary article. Even still, your additions were un-necessary - it is better to describe in words than depict with defecient images. By the way, please remember to preview your edits before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changeds and the page history. Thanks, --cj | talk 11:19, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Climate images
Hello. Please reconsider the inclusion of the climate images in the Cairns, Queensland and Townsville, Queensland articles. The images are very large, difficult to read due to poor resolution. In the case of the Townsville one, it also appears to interfere with the text. If you still feel that they should be included, then perhaps it would be appropriate to discuss this on the talk pages. Thanks. -- Adz|talk 04:33, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Biometrics (Journal)
I have nominated Biometrics (Journal), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Biometrics (Journal). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TRAVELLINGCARI My storyTell me yours 01:44, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Probably, when I had been looking for an articles in this journal, probably an older issue, I had difficulties, finding out, what this for a journal, where to get it from, whether it is still published, and by whom and so on. Since I do not know any general source for such information, and since I regard the wikipedia as a kind of universal encyclopedia where practically information about all things in the world and beyond are being collected, so that one can resort to it at least for a link to further information, I entered the information obtained about this and other things through probably many hours long searches to it. I think, it can help many scientists and students to save considerable amounts of precious time ...

AfD nomination of Meeresforschung
An article that you have been involved in editing, Meeresforschung, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Biometrics (Journal). Thank you. TRAVELLINGCARI My storyTell me yours 02:00, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

FAO Fisheries Circulars
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article FAO Fisheries Circulars, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of FAO Fisheries Circulars. TRAVELLINGCARI My storyTell me yours 02:05, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Meeresforschung
I have nominated Meeresforschung, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Meeresforschung. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TRAVELLINGCARI My storyTell me yours 02:55, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Argadorian Calendar
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Argadorian Calendar, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Non-notable original research

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. §FreeRangeFrog 06:24, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Argadorian Calendar
An article that you have been involved in editing, Argadorian Calendar, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Argadorian Calendar. Thank you. Brianyoumans (talk) 07:15, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

AFD for Argadorian Calendar
Please do not remove the afd notice at the top of the article. It does not halt the AFD discussion, and it means that readers of the article are not aware of the deletion discussion and do not contribute to it. Brianyoumans (talk) 15:16, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Argadorian Calendar
A tag has been placed on Argadorian Calendar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 04:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

February 2009
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Mr. Vernon (talk) 04:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)