User talk:Auroraaaaaaaaa

Philosophy vs. Psychology
Hello,

I understand that my conduct is irresponsible and has no place on this site, however I made a change that I thought was right.

In the grand scheme of things, I do not believe that the order of philosophy and psychology really matters. Although, if philosophy comes first, then it strengthens the 1st link game.

To argue for this change is to argue for enjoyment, fun, and patterns. These are good things. You can analyze why a lot of links lead to philosophy, but such matters are trivial and for intellectuals.

In short, although my means are wrong, my end is right, and I think that this change makes the world, and Wikipedia, a little bit better.

Sincerely,

Skibiditoilet1234567 Skibiditoilet1234567 (talk) 18:58, 1 July 2024 (UTC)


 * You need to shape up. If you want to improve Wikipedia, there are a million other ways you could do so without such irresponsible conduct as jumping straight to edit-warring after having made no attempt whatsoever to settle a dispute, argue your case, or even to redirect them to the article's Talk page, where this exact dispute has already been settled (in your favor!); not to mention insulting the other user. Instead, your conduct is not just unhelpful, but actively inflammatory - there was an entirely separate edit war over this less than a week ago; we don't need that again. This is not an appropriate way to settle a dispute, and I hope you learn from this in future. Auroraaaaaaaaa (talk) 19:14, 1 July 2024 (UTC)