User talk:Ausgoth

Welcome!

 * }

July 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page First-person shooter has been reverted. Your edit here to First-person shooter was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aipGP5oAuWQ) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:00, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

October 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  15:42, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Warning regarding grammatically incorrect inputs on Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Hi we appreciate your desire to improve articles in wikipedia, but may we warn you that continuos insistence of putting grammatically incorrect inputs on certain articles may merit your account a suspension. If you desire to add info but you are not sure about the grammar of your input, please feel free to use the talk page first and let the other users help you in fixing your input before incorporating it into the article. JeromesandilanicoJSD (talk) 10:41, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Samsung Galaxy Note 3 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ViperSnake151  Talk  15:30, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  15:45, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

3RR block
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule&#32;at Samsung Galaxy Note 3. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  K rakatoa    K atie   16:28, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  21:23, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Final warning regarding Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Hi may we remind you that this is your final warning against your edits which majority of the users have not agreed upon. If you wish to contest and/or add something that users are reverting please use the talk page Talk:Samsung Galaxy Note 3. Persistence on false and unagreed edits by majority is sanctionable accordingly.JeromesandilanicoJSD (talk) 14:32, 15 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi Ausgoth, given the ongoing dispute on this article, I've fully protected the page and started a discussion at Talk:Samsung Galaxy Note 3. Your participation would be welcome. Best. Acalamari 11:46, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I will add, however, that continuing to edit-war after the protection has expired will result in blocks rather than another bout of protection; I would like to see the dispute resolved. Acalamari 11:58, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

I protected the page to encourage discussion. While ‎Jeromesandilanico gave their input on the talk page, you did not participate and instead chose to continue reverting once the protection expired. I strongly encourage you to participate in discussion when your block has expired rather than continue reverting; otherwise, you will be blocked again. Acalamari 11:39, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

November 2013
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for continuing to make the same edit after having been blocked for it in the past. Two hours after your previous 1-week block expired, you made the exact same edit to the article. This is disruptive and won't be tolerated., as you did at Samsung Galaxy Note 3. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ‑Scottywong | soliloquize _ 16:37, 2 November 2013 (UTC)