User talk:Ausnarnia

September 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=624670611 your edit] to Cross Gene may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:52, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * # "Solar Instrumental）"

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:18, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Clarifying the Korean name infobox issue
The Korean name infobox functions to show Korean names in hangul with the standard romanizations of those words. An example of a group that could use this type of infobox is Shinhwa, which is a Korean word. In the case of Cross Gene, "크로스진" is a hangul-ized version of two English words. A Korean name infobox would function only to re-romanize what were English words to begin with. There is no purpose. The hangul are already included in the article's lead, so it's not like that information has been eliminated. Does that make sense? ^_^ Happy editing! Shinyang-i (talk) 08:42, 3 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Understandable. Although I definitely didn't find anything in the Koreanname template info nor the naming conventions that precluded the use of the template in such a circumstance. Additionally repeated information is not necessarily redundant. However this issue is trivial and I'm not exactly married to the box so as long as the hangul format of their name is on the page it is not as important where. Ausnarnia (talk) 10:20, 3 January 2015 (UTC)