User talk:Aussie Evil/Past Talk Library/2007/Dec

User:65.2.32.206
A 4im should not be issued without a reason, expecially as the IP has never been in trouble before. It is improper to give an IP with only one previous warning a 4im. I am removing it and giving a proper warning. If you wish to put it back please explain as to why the IP deserves it using diffs. Rgoodermote  21:13, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * IP has been blocked from editing for 1 day so there is no need to worry about this one. Next time the IP vandalizes a page you have the right to issue a 4im warning without an explanation as long as it is in a reasonable time frame after the block has been lifted. The reason behind this is that a block can really only occur if the user is full aware that there action is disruptive. If you issue a 4im without showing a diff the blocking admin will most likely not block. This only goes for anons and users that have no previous warnings. To ensure a block one must have at least a full set of warnings. Even though there are cases in which you are allowed to jump directly to a different higher warning without a diff. It is mostly for 4im warnings that you will need a diff, I have learned that off of personal experience, most admin do look at the users contributions. But for those who do not or can not find the edit providing a diff and a reason is a very good way of ensuring a block goes through. Rgoodermote   21:37, 23 December 2007 (UTC)