User talk:Aust331/Archive 1

Map4 FS
Could you take another look at MapR FS? You reviewed it while I was adding references. That may resolve the tags you added.

Thanks! TedDunning (talk) 09:49, 21 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi. Had another look at the references in MapR FS and it requires more to meet notability requirements. Aust331 (talk) 09:57, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Aust331! Thanks so much for reviewing my article for Depop. May I ask you to review the changes I made re: advertising and inappropriate links flag? Point taken and changes made.Gregwagland (talk) 00:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi Gregwagland; Have reviewed and removed the tag. Aust331 (talk) 00:23, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Reviewing George H. Everett Jeffrey
Could you help out? See talk page: I got the name wrong: should be Jeffery.--Shirazibustan (talk) 10:26, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Done. Aust331 (talk) 10:33, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Review Earth April
Hi, thanks for your editing for Earth April, it was tagged for speedy deletion, I responded in the talk page can you have a look and remove the tag? Fn2gf3431 (talk) 03:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi Fn2gf3431, as it stands, the article seems to require stronger 3rd-party sources. I cannot remove the tag without this first. Aust331 (talk) 08:40, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, but it already has it, the positive review from international leading scientist bekoff for the project of earth april https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/animal-emotions/201204/the-superior-human-who-do-we-think-we-are Fn2gf3431 (talk) 08:51, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * It needs more than a single review. Aust331 (talk) 08:55, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I added more sources,can you have a look? Or you can just google 'The Superior Human?'. Fn2gf3431 (talk) 09:30, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The organization's most 'notable' accomplishment, The Superior Human? (Documentary), is currently undergoing an AfD discussion. Part of the problem is that both articles (the organization's and the documentary's) describe the documentary as having received "hundreds" of positive reviews, but this is not the case (it may have received positive reviews from the general public and small organizations, but only a few from notable, independent, and trusted sources). I've googled the film and it has indeed received some feedback (although the youtube link's voting has been turned off), but at this point it seems this issue will be resolved via the AfD discussion. I would suggest you contest the Speedy deletion on the article's talk page, outlining this and any other detailed reason why you don't think the article should be deleted. Aust331 (talk) 09:55, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * There are hundreds positive reviews on Youtube comment section alone. The Superior Human? has been there for 2 years, you can check the history. What is your opinion of the deletion? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Superior_Human%3F  Fn2gf3431 (talk) 10:16, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * That is my point, "hundreds of positive reviews on Youtube" does not qualify the article as notable. Aust331 (talk) 10:51, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * What about others aspects? involving many world leading academics?Fn2gf3431 (talk) 11:20, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * But there aren't many. Aust331 (talk) 11:21, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Richard D. Ryder, Steven Best, Bernard Rollin and  Marc Bekoff at lest. Please look into their wikipedia pages Fn2gf3431 (talk) 11:43, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Songlines (magazine), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tony Allen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Monumental Pictures
The organization is opening a new film in September at festivals across the world. I'm more than sure that adequate publicity and coverage of it including published articles will emerge when this happens. I'll be more than happy to provide them to the page when that happens. Is there anything I can do in the meantime? I found some podcasts and blogposts that might be of interest. I have followed this organization for a very long time. They are legitimately popular and sell out theaters that I have been to first hand. The farthest back I can find the official website according to it's registrar and the internet archive is 2001. I don't know if this means anything to it's credibility?Contentcreatordata (talk) 12:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Alexia Thomas
Nice catch. I have deleted the article as re-creation of a deleted article, self-promotion, and general crackpottery. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 20:05, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

My Page
Please do not erase my page. I have worked hard on it and it has much importance. Page: PUFFAR — Preceding unsigned comment added by PUFFAR (talk • contribs) 08:15, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * If you do not want the page to be deleted, then you need to establish why it should be kept and provide evidence of notability. As it stands, the page does not meet Wikipedia's standards. Aust331 (talk) 08:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)