User talk:AustinPetryk/Sociology of Language

Peer Review

 * The content and sources within the draft are very strong, but it reads similar to an essay.
 * The last paragraph especially reads like an argument, and there is not a reference.
 * The organization of the draft is easy to read and the information is well distributed.
 * There are a few grammatical errors, and sometimes the wording is confusing.
 * There is little information supporting a negative view of world English. Is there an objection or do some think it is more important than others?
 * I don't think the first paragraph can work without a reference, otherwise it seems very argument-like and can't accurately represent the body of research on the topic.
 * Overall, I think the draft is really strong, but the language needs to be less persuasive. Other sides of the conversation could be shown. ECappBU (talk) 03:45, 3 May 2023 (UTC)