User talk:AustinRyder117/sandbox

Austin's Peer Review by ASmitty10
In terms of Level 1 (content): There is a substantial amount of content currently drafted in the sandbox. The specific Wikipedia page being added to is clearly stated, as is the review paper being used to make such additions. Important facts provided by the research article have clearly been incorporated into the draft; these facts provide insight as to the main focus of the draft. Furthermore, the personal notes section of the article provides further detail to specific areas of interest, and areas that will be incorporated into the finalized addition to the Wikipedia page. The Data and Discussion/Implications sections further elaborate on the specific aspects of trichomes that you intend to focus on, and provides the data you intend to discuss.

In Terms of Level 2 (Organization): The draft is well organized. Each section clearly states what you will be focusing on and indicates the goals you have when drafting your paper.

In Terms of Level 3 (Grammar): There are no grammatical errors!

The only other suggestion I have is to get started on finalizing your draft and bringing all your collected research content together in order to make a successful addition to your Wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ASmitty10 (talk • contribs) 16:21, 29 April 2019 (UTC)