User talk:AustinWikiEditor

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Waste Control Specialists. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Crazymonkey1123 (Jacob) (Shout!) 19:05, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Harold Simmons. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Harold Simmons was changed by AustinWikiEditor (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955329 on 2011-03-24T20:09:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:09, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Harold Simmons
Hi, I noticed you've been removing some information from the article on Harold Simmons. Could you explain why you are removing that information? For future reference, when you make an edit there is a box above the save button entitled 'summary' where you should put a short explanation of why you are making an edit, so that other editors will know why you did what you did. If you don't supply that information, it may make it appear that you are removing the material for no reason, which could lead to your account being blocked. Prodego talk  20:12, 24 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I'd appreciate if you would respond to this so we can work out any problems with the article together. Just removing the content repeatedly is going to cause other editors to assume your edits are vandalism. I'd be happy to work with you to remove any problematic content. Prodego  talk  20:22, 24 March 2011 (UTC)


 * If you edit the page again, I am going to place a block on your account so you will not be able to edit until you explain the reasons for removing that content. I'd be happy to assist if there is problematic content on the page, but you cannot simply remove material for no reason. Prodego  talk  20:27, 24 March 2011 (UTC)