User talk:Austin Jaax

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Iustus Republic (July 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Iustus Republic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Iustus Republic, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Iustus_Republic Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Iustus_Republic reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:14, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Iustus Republic Reply
I don't have an issue with micronations per say, however given that the only sources provided are either self-created or a wiki-based source (which anybody can edit or add information - i.e. no real editorial oversight), with most of the information only added by yourself in the last few weeks. If you can provide some independent reliable secondary sources to show that this is not just something that you have made up then you may be able to show that the article and the subject are notable however at this stage you've provided nothing to show otherwise. Dan arndt (talk) 09:01, 4 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Sources such as MicroWiki are not considered as reliable sources as they are largely user-generated (see WP:UG). As I indicated above the information contained on the MicroWiki relating to the Iustus Republic, appears to be all generated by yourself - which is essentially a primary source or original research, either way it is not acceptable for Wikipedia. In addition there is the issue of whether you have a confict of interest. Dan arndt (talk) 09:33, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The Iustus Republic


A tag has been placed on Draft:The Iustus Republic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Legacypac (talk) 05:03, 15 October 2018 (UTC)