User talk:Austin Polling

Hi there. Are you also Hkstrategies ATX and Hkstrategies? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:02, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Yes, you are. I have blocked you. Do not create more accounts. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:14, 21 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi Anna Frodesiak. Last week, Boing! said Zebedee gave me the impression I was able to create a new account, as long as it didn't include hkstrategies in the username. I created the article Zandan Poll again, trying to be objective as possible. If the reason it's being proposed for deletion is really the poll results, I would be happy to remove the section about the 2017 results. I am really not trying to pull one over on you. I would love some constructive criticism to make this page better. Thank you, Austin_Polling


 * It was made clear by me at User talk:Hkstrategies why you were blocked. You made another account. It was made clear by me at User talk:Hkstrategies ATX why you were blocked there.


 * You wrote above "...Boing! said Zebedee gave me the impression I was able to create a new account, as long as it didn't include hkstrategies in the username..."? No he did not. Boing! said Zebedee said there "...You can't have a username with "HKStrategies" in it. And if you make a new request, please properly address the concerns below..."


 * The big brown box at User talk:Hkstrategies ATX says "...This blocked user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. .." It was "declined" and you made a third account.


 * You are an undeclared paid editor here produce an article. Please tell your employer what happened. Do not create more accounts. Do not recreate that article.


 * If you have anything further to say, please log in at your first account (User talk:Hkstrategies). Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:14, 21 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi again, Anna Frodesiak. I guess I didn't understand what Boing! said Zebedee meant when he/she wrote, "And if you make a new request, please properly address the concerns below..." I took that as an ok to create a new account. I would be happy to further communicate through Hkstrategies_ATX if that works better for you.


 * If the only outstanding item with the article was listing the poll results, would it remedy the situation to remove that section and publish the article? All the sources noted were from accredited news organizations in Austin. The Zandan Poll did not pay us or me to put this together. This was and is a pro bono project to bring to the city of Austin-- it would be too late to promote even if we wanted to - there was a public launch with the Mayor earlier this year. The purpose of the Zandan Poll is to be used by the city to inform residents and city leaders on what Austinites find important and the trajectory of the city. Since it is polling data, we want it to be objective as possible to fully maximize its benefit to the city. What can I do to make this work? I am open to all of your suggestions. We have never set up a Wiki page before and clearly have made missteps and will do what you need to make them right. Thank you for your time!


 * I wrote above "...If you have anything further to say, please log in at your first account (User talk:Hkstrategies)..." You responded with: "...I would be happy to further communicate through Hkstrategies_ATX if that works better for you..."


 * Please log out and log back into your User talk:Hkstrategies account. Discuss things there. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:04, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zandan Poll


The article Zandan Poll has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Sources available seem to be about poll results rather than poll."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 07:58, 21 June 2017 (UTC)