User talk:Austinlee03/sandbox

Feedback for peer review- (Yousef ALnajjar)

For the replication paragraph, you might want to add the word "DNA" before the word replication and maybe describe in more detail the process of how it hinders it if there's new and recent information that covers it.

Place a comma after (CSWNT).

Might want to dissect the first sentence of your second paragraph into two sentences. There's just too much information that could be displayed more effectively.

"Has the ability" instead of "have the ability" in the second line of the second paragraph.

"The process of senescence and apoptosis of cancer cells is attainable seen in vivo and in vitro" you might want to consider discussing this a little more. Maybe explain how or relate it to a study.

In the last sentence of the second paragraph mention how these i-motifs may be formed, or go more into depth on how it affects the ends of the telomeres.

"exist;" put a comma instead of the semicolon.

Overall you have good citations linked to other Wikipedia pages. I cant see your references though, there's just a bunch of numbers in brackets, you might want to consider fixing that problem.

You need to however insert more information and content into your paragraphs, the ideas are great but need to be supported further by using more journal articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yousefmalnajjar (talk • contribs) 14:58, 11 December 2020 (UTC)