User talk:Austrade

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Austrade, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Bjenks (talk) 02:09, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Promotional edits
Hi, again. Please read the Wikipedia policy on using WP as an advertising medium. You have an explicit special interest in promoting Austrade, for which an appropriate online venue is the organisation's elaborate and extensive ofdficial website. It is NOT the purpose of Wikipedia to duplicate large slabs of that website, but to impartially summarise the essential features of Austrade, including those which may be unpalatable from a promotional point of view.

Before replacing properly structured content and citations with arbitrarily pasted content from the official website, and inserting unformatted loose citations, please in future discuss your opinions on the Talk page, so as to invite timely consultation and avoid the need to revert edits as I have done on this occasion. Please also note that only one mention is required of the referenced leaflet "Reform of the Australian Trade Commission: Maximising Our Value". This can be as an 'external link' at the foot of the article, or as an inline citation, as you wish to add—but to have both is an unacceptable duplication. In this instance, as in several previous ones, I will adopt your own preference for an inline citation. Bjenks (talk) 04:21, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Your edits
It sadens me that you, "an authorised Austrade employee, who has corrected titles and added content that reflects the organisations' current activities and services", who is getting paid to make your edits to wikipedia by me and all other Australian taxpayers, is doing such a poor quality job. In notable contrast, User:Bjenks is doing this for free, without the support of, (or access to), the resources available to you, and is doing the job with a level of quality significantly higher than you are. You should be ashamed of yourself. If you can't do the job to an acceptable standard, either find someone who can, or "stay out of the kitchen". You are embarassing me and all other Australians who are witness to your poor quality work. Pdfpdf (talk) 13:42, 13 March 2013 (UTC)