User talk:Australiania!

Fair use rationale for Image:Daniellec.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Daniellec.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:40, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Kchacademyawards.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Kchacademyawards.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:04, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Daniellec.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Daniellec.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SQL Query me! 06:00, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Daniellec.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Daniellec.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:27, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kchacademyawards.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Kchacademyawards.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:27, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Protection templates
Hi Australiania. Please be aware that added protection templates to articles does not protect them: only administrators can protect articles, and the templates are then added to advise that they are indeed protected. As noted on the template page itself, "This template is not to be used as a bluff. Only use it on SEMI-PROTECTED pages. Please note that only administrators can protect pages". With that in mind, please stop adding these templates. Thanks. Talk Islander 13:37, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

GA Review
Thankyou for nominating Keisha Castle-Hughes for GA. Unfortunately, this article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of, , compares against the  six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: Fail
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Neutral
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: Fail
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
 * 5. Article stability? Pass
 * 6. Images?: Fail

A solid start has been made to this article, however there is a great deal to be done before it can be considered as a GA. If you take a look at the Wikipedia Emma Watson article, you can get an idea of just what can, and should, be written about a young actress.

For example:


 * Far more is needed on Keisha Castle-Hughes' background, and the confusion, as detailed on this talk page, over her nationality situation should be cleared up. The lead is also far too short, and should ideally include more about her early life and career.
 * More detail, and references to back up the facts, are needed about her family too, as well as clarication over her father's nationality. He is either English with Australian roots or Australian with English roots, but not "English-Australian."
 * The very short section on her career simply dives into her appearance in the film Whale Rider as an 11-year-old. There is no background information on how she got the role, what filming was like, etc. This needs much more detail, and far more references.
 * The same goes for the paragraph on her film projects since Whale Rider. She has made several films, yet there is hardly anything written about them.
 * There are no images, and although this is not a criteria for passing GA, it would make the article look brighter.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it reassessed. -- seahamlass  10:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Thank you for your work so far.

Fair use rationale for Image:Aflabfacey.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Aflabfacey.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI 01:51, April 5, 2008

GA nomination
Thank you for nominating The Devil Wears Prada for GA. It always flatters me when someone else nominates an article I have worked on so hard, and I don't think there's any article save Anna Wintour (already a GA, and a biography A-class) that I've put as much into.

I don't know when it will be reviewed; I haven't kept pace with GAN in a while. However, hopefully before then I will have made the split (of what's essentially the "making of" article) that I've been putting off for a year. You sort of forced a hand that maybe needed some forcing. And then if it passes, an FA nom might not be out of the question. Daniel Case 09:58, April 5, 2008

Image source problem with Image:Kchaa.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kchaa.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:50, 29 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 03:50, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of All Flesh Must Be Eaten: The Movie
A tag has been placed on All Flesh Must Be Eaten: The Movie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. PoinDexta1 12:04, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Kchwr.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Kchwr.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by an adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 18:43, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:Sratonement.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:Sratonement.jpg, has been listed at because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Tabercil (talk) 05:15, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Adventures of Snugglepot & Cuddlepie and Little Ragged Blossom
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. – ThatWikiGuy (talk) 09:33, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of article to create disambig
Nah - needs a lot more thinking that one - you do not delete valid articles to create a new disambig - you create new disambigs - specially if you are creating a whole range of red links as you have at the disambig - nah not a good way to go - and the specific disambig does not look like one - it looks like a wish list.

Disambigs link to valid blue links - live articles.

Please realise that you are gonna get speedy deletes and a few annoyed eds wondering what on earth you are up to when you do that what you have done. Try to think to one side - you do not delete valid articles at a whim either - it should have been addressed at a talk page - at least three no no's on mothers day!

If you specifically had repositioned the deleted material into another article- and created valid notable stubs which were both put in suitable categories and tagged for the oz lit project - so that the disambig was linking to real articles - there might have been some redeeming issues - as it is you have left a mess that you will probably find someone may well revert - accept it - and try to not do what you did again.
 * Create a new disambig that points only to valid unchallenged articles
 * Make sure the previous article is recovered and put somewhere - while you are in 'mid flight' or off wikipedia
 * Expect speedy delete's from those who cannot read your mind :( from your edits

SatuSuro 12:50, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Snugglepot and Cuddlepie book series
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Snugglepot and Cuddlepie book series, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Talk Islander 13:31, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:S&c1.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:S&c1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Talk Islander 13:36, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Keisha Castle-Hughes
Template:Keisha Castle-Hughes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Wildhartlivie (talk) 12:15, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, 49th Australian Film Institute Award nominees and winners, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, 49th Australian Film Institute Award nominees and winners appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. 49th Australian Film Institute Award nominees and winners has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:49th Australian Film Institute Award nominees and winners and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:49th Australian Film Institute Award nominees and winners with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:49th Australian Film Institute Award nominees and winners.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. ←Signed:→ Mr. E. Sánchez  Get to know me! / Talk to me! ←at≈:→ 05:16, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo kenvale.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Logo kenvale.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:42, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Kenvale.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kenvale.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:44, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Unfinished Sky
A tag has been placed on Unfinished Sky requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Patar knight - chat/contributions 23:36, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Toby summerheightshigh.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Toby summerheightshigh.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 15:24, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)