User talk:Australisian

3RR template usage
I noticed that you warned a user who does not appear to be edit warring. Please note that 3RR means more than 3 reverts of the same article in a 24 hour period. Also, a series on uninterrupted edits counts as one edit for the purposes of 3RR. Please don't misuse the 3RR warning template to intimidate other users. If you are having a content dispute with another users, please follow the standard dispute resolution processes. Try to find a compromise wording rather than repeatedly reverting another user's edits yourself. Yworo (talk) 22:50, 3 June 2010 (UTC)


 * I looked at the history. You have both reverted 3 times. If he reverts again, you may report him at WP:3RRN. If you also revert him, I'll be happy to report you in return. It takes two to edit war. Yworo (talk) 23:20, 3 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Until today, past reverts by the other user appear to be at most one per day. That's not 3RR. Yworo (talk) 23:39, 3 June 2010 (UTC)


 * You appear to have reverted 3 times today. At the 3rd revert is when the warning is supposed to be delivered. To prevent you from reverting a 4th time. Yworo (talk) 23:44, 3 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh, and I just reviewed the 3RR report you filed back in May to get the article protected. It was a false report, as the reverts listed were not all in a 24-hour period. Stop reverting, discuss, and follow dispute resolution. Yworo (talk) 23:54, 3 June 2010 (UTC)


 * You already warned him. Why would I warn him again? If you hadn't already warned him, I certainly would have at his 3rd revert just like I did with you. Yworo (talk) 00:35, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Now he has really broken 3RR and may be reported at WP:3RRN. Yworo (talk) 12:16, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I've reported him here if you'd like to add any comments to the report. Yworo (talk) 12:28, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Yworo (talk) 23:15, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * See the result of the 3RR case here. Note that you are mentioned in the closure. It takes two or more people to make a revert war, and your actions can be questioned as well. Neither you nor the other party can point to a talk page consensus in support of your position. Consider opening an WP:RFC to clarify what editors think generally. EdJohnston (talk) 13:37, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Since you went ahead and made a fourth revert at Economy of the United Kingdom after my above warning, you are blocked 24 hours. The previous discussion was at WP:AN3. If you believe this block is not justified, add to your talk page and another admin will review it. EdJohnston (talk) 18:55, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Now don't you feel "like a bit of a twat"? - Ledenierhomme (talk) 02:18, 7 June 2010 (UTC)