User talk:AuthorLaurence

Speedy deletion nomination of User:AuthorLaurence


A tag has been placed on User:AuthorLaurence, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Super Mario  Man  18:31, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

This page should not be speedy deleted because...
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --99.17.103.205 (talk) 23:11, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

There is absolutely no basis what-so-ever for removal of the article in question, as nothing is getting promoted except the truth of the Amanda Knox case. At this point I don't give a shit what the Nazis who decided the subject article promoted anything. This is pure bullshit and fascism. It took so long to decide that my article should be deleted that in the meantime Amanda Knox was freed as I suggested in my article that she should be.

No response back to me is required. This delayed decision is enough for me to know that this site is not the place to put substantive information.